Stellantis inks deal that could benefit Jaguar-Land Rover buyers in the US


Stellantis is looking to deepen its presence in the United States through a new collaboration with Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), marking another major move in CEO Antonio Filosa’s ongoing restructuring strategy. The company confirmed that both automakers have signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to explore product development opportunities in the US market.

The agreement could eventually open the door for JLR to access Stellantis manufacturing facilities in America, helping the British luxury carmaker avoid costly import tariffs in one of its biggest markets. While neither company confirmed production plans, the partnership signals a potentially significant shift in how global automakers are navigating rising trade barriers and mounting operational costs.

A new direction for Stellantis

The announcement comes as Stellantis undergoes a sweeping transformation following years of criticism over underinvestment under former CEO Carlos Tavares. Antonio Filosa, who took over nearly a year ago, has made partnerships a central part of the company’s recovery strategy.

Stellantis owns major automotive brands including Jeep, Ram, Dodge, Chrysler, Peugeot, Citroën, and Fiat. The automaker has struggled in recent years with slowing growth, declining market share, and operational inefficiencies across multiple regions.

To stabilize the business, Stellantis has aggressively pursued new alliances. The company recently expanded collaborations with Chinese firms Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology Co. and Dongfeng Motor Corp. to improve its European business and revive production in China. Last year, Stellantis also pledged a massive $13 billion investment to revitalize its US operations.

Why this matters

For Jaguar Land Rover, the potential benefits are obvious. Building or developing vehicles through Stellantis facilities in the US could reduce exposure to import tariffs while improving supply chain efficiency. That becomes increasingly important as trade policies continue to shift globally.

For Stellantis, partnering with a premium luxury brand like JLR could strengthen its manufacturing utilization in North America while helping spread development costs across multiple companies. More broadly, the deal highlights how traditional automakers are increasingly relying on partnerships instead of operating independently. Developing new vehicles, especially electrified models, has become significantly more expensive, pushing companies toward shared platforms, factories, and engineering resources.

According to a report by the Financial Times, both companies signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to potentially collaborate on product and technology development opportunities in the US market. According to one person quoted in the FT report, who was familiar with the discussions, the deal could eventually involve producing vehicles at a Stellantis manufacturing facility in America.

Negotiations between the two automakers are reportedly still in the early stages. However, JLR CEO PB Balaji said the potential partnership could support the company’s “long-term growth plans for the US market.” JLR is also aiming to strengthen its American presence with the future launches of electric Range Rover and Jaguar models.

The agreement could potentially allow JLR, owned by Tata Motors, to access Stellantis factories in the US, helping reduce exposure to import tariffs in one of its biggest markets. While no manufacturing plans have been finalized, the talks highlight how global automakers are increasingly relying on strategic partnerships to manage rising costs, shifting trade policies, and expensive EV development programs.

What consumers should watch next?

While the agreement remains preliminary, investors and industry analysts will likely pay close attention to Stellantis’ upcoming capital markets day, where Filosa is expected to reveal more details about the company’s long-term strategy.

If the partnership evolves into local manufacturing or co-developed vehicles, it could reshape how Jaguar Land Rover operates in the US while further cementing Stellantis’ role as a manufacturing and technology partner for global automotive brands.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link