Rocket Lab’s revenue grew 64 per cent, its stock hit a record high, and its backlog reached 2.2 billion dollars. The company sold more launches in the first quarter of 2026 than in the entire previous year. The only thing that has not launched yet is the rocket the market is pricing in.

First-quarter revenue was 200.3 million dollars, up from 122.6 million a year earlier, beating analyst estimates that had already been raised twice in the past three months. Space systems, the division that builds satellites and spacecraft components, generated 136.7 million dollars. The launch business contributed 63.7 million. Both exceeded expectations. The stock rose 30 per cent in after-hours trading to a record high, valuing the company at approximately 45 billion dollars.

The quarter

The financial results showed a company accelerating across every segment. Gross margin reached 38.2 per cent, up from the low thirties a year ago. The net loss narrowed to 45 million dollars from 60.6 million in the first quarter of 2025. Adjusted EBITDA loss was 11.8 million, a figure that suggests profitability is within reach if the revenue trajectory holds.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Rocket Lab signed 31 new Electron and HASTE launch contracts in the quarter, plus five contracts for Neutron, its medium-lift rocket that has not yet flown. The company announced its largest launch deal in history, a bulk purchase of Neutron and Electron flights from an undisclosed customer whose identity and order size the company declined to reveal.

The same day, Rocket Lab disclosed a 30 million dollar contract from Anduril Industries for three HASTE hypersonic test flights from its Virginia launch complex. The HASTE vehicle, a suborbital variant of Electron, serves as a testbed for hypersonic technologies at speeds exceeding Mach 5. Anduril is funding the flights with its own capital, not government money, a distinction that signals private-sector demand for hypersonic testing infrastructure that previously existed only within government programmes.

The backlog

The 2.2 billion dollar backlog is the number that explains why investors added 10 billion dollars to the company’s market capitalisation in a single evening. A year ago, Rocket Lab’s backlog was approximately 1.1 billion. It has doubled in twelve months. The largest component is an 816 million dollar prime contract to build a missile defence constellation for the Space Development Agency, the satellite procurement arm of the Space Force.

Second-quarter guidance of 225 to 240 million dollars in revenue exceeded Wall Street’s estimate of 205 million by a margin wide enough to suggest that analysts had not fully accounted for the acceleration. CEO Peter Beck said the pipeline supports continued growth into the second half and beyond.

The company’s customer base spans government and commercial clients. It launches satellites for the National Reconnaissance Office, NASA, the Space Force, and allied militaries. It builds spacecraft components for constellations operated by companies including GlobalStar. It is developing the SDA’s Tranche 2 Transport Layer satellites. The breadth of the business is the argument for the valuation: Rocket Lab is not just a launch company, it is a vertically integrated space infrastructure provider.

The rocket

Neutron is the medium-lift launch vehicle on which Rocket Lab’s ambitions depend. It is designed to carry 13,000 kilograms to low Earth orbit in a reusable configuration and 15,000 kilograms expendable. It is intended to compete for the constellation deployment, national security, and deep space missions that are currently served almost exclusively by SpaceX’s Falcon 9.

The rocket has not flown. Beck said first-flight hardware integration is underway, Archimedes engine qualification is progressing, and the second stage and reusable fairing systems are advancing. The debut launch is targeted for later this year. Rocket Lab has said “later this year” about Neutron before. The original target was late 2024. It slipped to mid-2025, then to 2026. Each delay has been accompanied by plausible technical explanations and continued investor patience.

The patience is partly justified by Electron’s track record. Dawn Aerospace, the New Zealand spaceplane company, has demonstrated that small nations can produce credible launch vehicles, but Rocket Lab has gone further than any non-American, non-SpaceX company in building a commercially successful orbital launch business. Electron has completed more than 60 missions with a success rate exceeding 95 per cent. It is the most frequently launched orbital small rocket in the world. The question is whether the engineering discipline that made Electron reliable can scale to a vehicle ten times larger.

The market

SpaceX, which disclosed in its IPO filing that orbital data centres may not be viable, dominates the launch market with a cadence and cost structure that no competitor has matched. Falcon 9 launched more than 100 times in 2025. Rocket Lab launched 21 times. The gap is enormous. But the gap in market positioning is narrower than the gap in launch frequency suggests.

SpaceX’s backlog is dominated by its own Starlink constellation. Rocket Lab’s 2.2 billion dollar backlog is almost entirely third-party customers. The distinction matters because it means Rocket Lab’s revenue is diversified across dozens of government and commercial clients, while SpaceX’s launch revenue is heavily self-referential. For customers who want an alternative to SpaceX, or who need a launch provider that is not controlled by Elon Musk, Rocket Lab is increasingly the answer.

The race to put data centres, communications networks, and surveillance constellations in orbit is driving demand for launch capacity that exceeds what any single provider can supply. NATO is backing space and AI startups, the Space Development Agency is building a proliferated constellation architecture that requires hundreds of satellites, and commercial operators are scaling their own networks. The launch market is not zero-sum. There is more demand than there are rockets to serve it.

The bet

Peter Beck drew Rocket Lab’s logo on a napkin on a flight back to New Zealand in 2006. He had skipped university, taken an apprenticeship at a tools manufacturer, built a steam-powered rocket bicycle, and decided he was going to start a launch company. Twenty years later, the company he founded has a 45 billion dollar market capitalisation, a 2.2 billion dollar backlog, and contracts with the most sensitive national security programmes in the United States.

European defence technology alliances are forming between AI companies and military contractors, but Rocket Lab has built something rarer: a non-American company that the American defence establishment trusts with its most classified satellite programmes. The SDA constellation contract, the NRO missions, and the Anduril hypersonic flights all require security clearances and operational trust that take years to establish.

The stock’s 30 per cent surge reflects a market that believes the backlog will convert to revenue, the Neutron delays will end, and the defence and commercial pipelines will sustain growth rates above 50 per cent. Beck has delivered on every commitment except the one that matters most. Neutron’s first flight will determine whether Rocket Lab is a successful small-launch company with a large valuation or a full-spectrum space company that justifies one. The backlog says the customers are ready. The question is whether the rocket is.