Peering In: A Look at Mental Health Peer Providers and How They Help People Recover


I believe that recovery is possible. Not just for me, but for EVERYONE. Does this mean that everyone recovers? No, because not everyone is taught the skills to recover. Also, once a person learns the skills, they must choose to use them. My peer specialist colleagues and I can give you a flashlight so that you can see your way out of the darkness of mental illness.

Lighting the Way Out of Darkness

Kids seem to have a sixth sense. At least that was my experience of them while teaching middle school about a decade ago. There I was, working hard, while also vigilantly trying to hide the fact that I had spent the previous decade in and out of treatment for bipolar II disorder. Yet, somehow, my students kept on coming to me with their mental health struggles. Could they somehow sense that I was more than just sympathetic — that my empathy was that of a person who had experienced similar?

I will never clearly know the answer to this question — but one thing did become clear: I had to help these kids, and not just in the traditional way that a teacher is allowed to help–the old guidance counselor referral — but REALLY help. I remember my tenure year of teaching, when I sat down with another member of the staff at the school and told this person that I was resigning.

“Are you out of your mind?” my colleague said. “You have a stable job WITH a pension, and the economy is terrible. How could you give that up?”

My answer was simple: I needed to follow my heart-and my heart was with those kids-kids like me who could become anything they wanted if they were treated for their mental health struggles early. I knew this first-hand because I had lived it. After being in the psychiatric hospital at least 13 times during my college career, I graduated, gone to Columbia University to get a master’s in education, and started my journey in recovery teaching the students that I loved.

Yet, because I had a huge loan out from my second degree, I couldn’t afford to go back to school again for mental health, so I found an alternative: Peer Specialist training. It turned out that NJ had a program that trained people who were living in recovery from mental illness to provide mental health services to others. The concept was that a person with “lived experience” of mental illness and recovery could really help others to get well.

After the training, I went on to work as a peer specialist in community mental health centers, where I worked alongside social workers, psychiatrists, supported employment specialists, and others helping people to get well. I loved (and still love) the work. I even “hung a shingle” and began my own peer specialist practice, which still exists (shameless plug). And then, I got into training other mental health professionals and peers on how to implement services that really put the client and their recovery first (also known as Recovery-Oriented, Person-Centered services), which I still do also.

So, why do I believe in peer services so much? Well, first, I have seen first-hand how we can provide people with mental illness hope. No one can show a person that they can recover from mental illness like a person who’s been there. Second, peers know HOW to recover. Don’t get me wrong, recovery looks different for each person, but there are common themes and threads that run across every recovery story. We didn’t learn from a textbook how to help people recover. We learned how to help people by recovering ourselves. We’ve walked the walk, tried all different types of treatments, and we have seen first-hand what is effective. Third, we can be your biggest advocates. We know what the mental health system can be like: how at its worst it can be shaming, stigmatizing, and taking away people’s freedom. We know this because we’ve lived through it. And we don’t want you to live through the same pain. So, we’ll fight for you like no one else.

I believe that recovery is possible. Not just for me, but for EVERYONE. Does this mean that everyone recovers? No, because not everyone is taught the skills to recover. Also, once a person learns the skills, they must choose to use them. My peer specialist colleagues and I can give you a flashlight so that you can see your way out of the darkness of mental illness. You make the choice about whether to turn the flashlight on. I can tell you that life can be beautiful in the light of recovery. Won’t you join me here?

This article has been republished with permission. View the original source here.

Emily Grossman, MA, CPRP, is a Sr. Training and Consultation Specialist with the Rutgers Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling Professions. She is also a peer life coach, keynote speaker, and author. Learn more at www.emilygrossman.net or contact her at [email protected]. Order her book, Unlocked.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link