Meta spins off Supernatural VR fitness app after $400M acquisition



TL;DR

Meta is spinning off Supernatural, the VR fitness app it acquired for a reported $400 million in 2023 after an FTC antitrust fight, into an independent company called Supernatural Health. The new entity, led by the original founders, will relaunch this autumn with higher subscription prices.

In 2023, Meta fought an eight-month antitrust battle with the Federal Trade Commission for the right to acquire Within, the studio behind the VR fitness app Supernatural. The deal was reportedly worth around $400 million. Mark Zuckerberg even testified in court to get it done.

Less than three years later, Meta is handing it back. The company announced on 3 June that Supernatural will spin off into a new independent company called Supernatural Health, led by the app’s original founders. A new version of the app will launch this autumn on the Meta Quest platform, while Meta’s own version will be sunsetted on 3 December.

It is the rare big tech acquisition story that ends with the product surviving, even if the route it took to get here was absurd.

From courtroom victory to content freeze

The FTC sued to block Meta’s purchase of Within in July 2022, arguing the deal would be anti-competitive in the nascent VR fitness market. A federal judge disagreed, and Meta closed the acquisition in February 2023.

Supernatural thrived inside Meta for a time, offering beat-matching boxing and bat-swinging workouts set against sweeping virtual landscapes. It built a devoted community, particularly among older adults and people with mobility challenges who found in VR a form of exercise that felt more like play than punishment.

Then, in January 2026, Meta slashed roughly 1,500 jobs across Reality Labs, about 10% of the division’s workforce. Three VR game studios, Twisted Pixel, Sanzaru Games, and Armature Studio, were shuttered. Supernatural was placed into maintenance mode, with no new workouts, no new songs, no new features, and the coaches were let go.

The cuts were part of a broader pivot away from VR and toward AI-powered wearables. By May, Meta had cut a further 8,000 positions companywide, redirecting billions into AI infrastructure. Reality Labs, which has posted cumulative operating losses of approximately $90 billion since its creation, was no longer the centre of Zuckerberg’s ambitions.

The community pushed back

Supernatural’s users did not go quietly. A Change.org petition called on Meta either to keep investing in the app or to let the team spin it off as an independent operation funded by subscriptions. Members of the app’s Facebook community groups shared stories of weight loss, chronic pain management, and mental health improvements they attributed to the platform.

We all felt like it was purchased to kill,” one user wrote in the public Supernatural Facebook group after the spinoff was announced. “I am such a sap. Why am I tearing up?”

The pattern is familiar. Big tech companies routinely acquire products, strip them for parts or neglect them, and eventually shut them down, a cycle so well documented that entire websites exist to catalogue the dead. What makes Supernatural unusual is that Meta chose to let it walk away rather than simply pulling the plug.

What changes under Supernatural Health

The new company says it will bring back the original coaches and maintain the app’s core identity. “Same coaches, same DNA, same obsession with making fitness feel like the best part of your day,” Supernatural Health states on its website.

Prices, however, are going up. The annual subscription will rise from $100 to $180, and the monthly plan from $10 to $20, according to Engadget. Whether the increase reflects the true cost of running the service without Meta’s infrastructure, or the premium of independence, remains to be seen.

It is also unclear whether Supernatural Health will be able to expand beyond the Meta Quest platform, or what kind of content cadence the smaller team can sustain. The existing library of more than 3,000 workouts will carry over, but the real test is whether an indie studio can keep pace with the music licensing and production demands that a $400 million Meta acquisition once funded.

An expensive lesson in acquisition logic

The whole episode is a case study in how big tech acquisitions can go wrong, not because the product fails, but because the acquirer’s priorities shift. Meta recently had to unwind its $2 billion acquisition of AI startup Manus after Chinese regulators blocked the deal, writing off the entire position. The GIPHY acquisition ended similarly, with UK regulators ordering a forced sale.

Supernatural is a gentler version of the same story. Meta fought for it, won, and then decided it no longer wanted what it had bought.

For the users who built their daily routines around the app, the corporate logic is beside the point. They have their workout back, even if it costs nearly twice as much. Whether Supernatural Health can thrive as a small independent company in a VR market that its former owner is actively retreating from is a question that will take more than one product launch to answer.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna and Jason Hiner/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


It’s been several months since Samsung launched its Galaxy S26 series of phones, so now that the dust has settled, I’m reevaluating them against the industry’s best. That starts with the flagship Galaxy S26 Ultra

Between it and the best iPhone available, the iPhone 17 Pro Max, you might be wondering which one is the better investment. The easy answer is, “Stick with whichever OS you have now,” but in all honesty, both phones are good enough to justify a switch. If you’re going to go, go big! It doesn’t get much bigger than these two powerhouses, so let’s dive in and see which one is the winner.

Also: Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: I’ve tested both brands extensively, and there’s a clear winner

As it happens, I carry the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and also the latest Android phone, and it doesn’t get much more “latest” than the S26 Ultra, so these opinions are based on prior experience with the S25 Ultra, a good amount of hands-on review time with the S26 Ultra, and the specs we have on hand. 


You should buy the iPhone 17 Pro Max if…

iPhone 17 Pro Max in Cosmic Orange

Jason Hiner/ZDNET

1. You (or your family) are in the Apple ecosystem

Platform lock-in is a thing, and Apple has it better than most. Apple provides an entire ecosystem of devices and cross-device functionality that most other OEMs can’t match. It’s not that Samsung doesn’t have an ecosystem of its own, but Apple’s devices are designed from the ground up to work together. They’re on a level of detail that other ecosystems — including Samsung’s — can’t really compete with.

Also: I tested the iPhone Air for a week, and here’s why 17 Pro Max users shouldn’t sleep on it

Then, there’s the 800-pound gorilla in the room. If your family is also in the Apple ecosystem, there’s even more reason to stay there. One of the reasons I carry an iPhone everywhere is that my kids also have iPhones. “Dad, can you ring my phone?” is a common refrain in my house. Add iMessage and parental controls to that, and there are enough roadblocks to make not carrying an iPhone a pretty big headache.

There are software workarounds for just about everything an iPhone can do with other devices, but they’re just that — workarounds. If you want to be embedded in the Apple ecosystem, there is only one phone category you can carry.

2. You want a phone that just works

It’s a cliché, but it exists for a reason. Apple has a long history of being late to the party with a lot of features, but typically, when they get the feature, it’s very polished. Apple doesn’t take half-steps, and it rarely (though not never) treats its users like beta testers. It will take in the landscape, identify a feature that people like, and make it significantly better than the competition.

Also: I’ve tried every iPhone 17 model, and my golden rule for upgrading is changing in 2025

That philosophy extends to apps built for the platform as well. Apple maintains high standards for its App Store and approval process. I routinely encounter the same app on both platforms: it works flawlessly the first time on an iPhone but struggles on an Android phone. There’s a lot that goes into app development, especially on a platform like Android that can have multiple versions and flavors, so there’s no shade. Apple just delivers a better and more consistent experience.

3. You’re a video shooter

There are multiple reasons why the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the phone to use for video. First and foremost, it is storage. Put simply, the iPhone can get up to 2TB of onboard storage; the S26 Ultra maxes out at 1TB. A terabyte of storage seems like a lot — and it is, but if you’re shooting a ton of 8K or even 4K video, that’s going to chew up your storage in a hurry. This is also a solid argument if you’re a hardcore gamer, as they take up a lot of space these days.

Also: I’ve got one big reason to recommend a year-over-year upgrade to Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max

The iPhone also offers a really great video experience. From shooting in dedicated ProRes Raw mode to open gate shooting, if you’re a filmmaker, you want options, and the iPhone gives you a ton. There are also numerous apps in the App Store that you can use to capture, enhance, and edit your videos. 

Sure, there are apps in the Play Store for Android, but this combination of tools built for filmmakers makes the iPhone 17 Pro Max the phone to get for video enthusiasts.

You should buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if…

Prakhar Khanna holding the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

1. You want the raw power

As recently as two years ago, this heading would have belonged under the iPhone category. But after Qualcomm rolled out the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor for the Galaxy, things changed. Of course, we’re talking about raw numbers here — user experience and vertical integration go a long way on Apple’s side, but Qualcomm’s processors have started to outperform Apple’s on benchmarking apps, and that’s a big deal.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra: I’ve tried both flagships, and here’s my choice

Processing power is important in the realm of video processing/editing, gaming, and AI. If those are important categories for you, Samsung is the best game in town. The iPhone is a powerful machine, make no mistake, but the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is currently the most powerful phone you can buy at the moment. 

2. You’re all-in on AI 

Samsung Galaxy S26

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Unfortunately, Apple Intelligence has seen a few false starts now. Meanwhile, Samsung and Google keep rolling out AI-powered features one after another. This generation of Samsung phones is no exception, with Galaxy AI taking most of the headlines from this lineup of S26 smartphones. From editing images to the new Now Nudge feature, AI is all over this software release.

One particularly intriguing new feature is Gemini’s ability to summon an Uber with a command. Just tell Gemini where you want to go, and it’ll launch Uber, input the destination, and once you confirm, it’ll summon the car. This is the first of potentially numerous apps and services that can be further automated with AI. 

3. You value your privacy

Apple has always prided itself as a privacy-first company, and that’s fair enough. But Samsung is upping the ante with Privacy Screen, a hardware/software combination that could potentially change how people think about their phones and privacy. Samsung redesigned its screen to feature wide and narrow-angle pixels that the company can, through software, turn off individually to obscure the screen.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. S24 Ultra: I compared both models, here’s who should upgrade

It doesn’t just block looky-loos in the airplane seat next to you from reading your texts, but because it’s software-driven, you can selectively block specific elements on your screen. So your whole screen is bright and beautiful, but a notification rolls in and only blocks the area where it appears. 

Writer’s choice

Both of these phones are downright fantastic — there’s no question. But at the end of the day, if I had to pick, I’d go with the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. I have a dual-wielding phone lifestyle, but while I value the iPhone 17 Pro Max for its consistency and its comfort, Samsung and Android in general have a wider variety of fun form factors to play with, and that includes a multitude of accessories that you can buy into.

Apple works great within its ecosystem, and it’s just OK with everyone else. Android works very well with just about everything from Windows PCs to a wide variety of smartwatches and Bluetooth accessories. For everything an iPhone can connect to, an Android phone can connect to more. Plus, I didn’t even talk about the stylus here, because while I’m not a huge stylus person, I’m definitely a believer in the “it’s better to have it and not need it” philosophy.

Of course, as I mentioned before, I carry both. But I’m ultimately on Team Android, where I feel there’s more freedom. 

Specifications

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26

Display

6.9 AMOLED with 120Hz, 3000 nits peak

6.9″ QHD AMOLED 120Hz, TBD nits peak

Weight

233g

214g

Processor

Apple A19 Pro

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy

Storage

256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB

256GB, 512GB, 1TB

Battery

5,088mAh, 25W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

5,000mAh, 60W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

Camera

48MP wide / 48MP Ultra Wide / 48MP telephoto (4xx) / 18MP front

200MP wide / 50MP telephoto (5x) / 10MP telephoto (3x) / 50 MP ultrawide / 12MP front

Price

Starting at $1,199

Starting at $1,299





Source link