If you’re still hanging on to this classic Android file explorer, you need to switch now


In the 2010s, the file explorer apps Android phones came with were, frankly, pretty bad. Then came ES File Explorer, which quickly garnered millions of downloads thanks to getting the basics right and offering a fully-featured file explorer system for Android.

But as they say, you either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain. ES File Explorer turned into something much darker, and if you still have this app on one of your Android devices, you need to remove it.

ES File Explorer went from essential Android app to security nightmare

Same name, much worse contents

The problem isn’t that ES File Explorer is old, many old Android apps work just fine. The issue is that the app’s reputation collapsed after years of increasingly questionable behavior. Look at this official promo video from 2016, and you’ll get a sense of why it was so beloved.

You could FTP onto your Android device, see a breakdown of content type, clear your junk, and preview compressed file contents without unzipping then with the slow processors of the time.

The problem is that, over time, ES File Explorer transformed from a lightweight utility into something bloated with aggressive advertising, intrusive features, and suspicious background activity. Critical vulnerabilities were uncovered, and ultimately the app was removed from the Google Play Store, never to return. This was probably due to the presence of adware, and ad fraud where the app would click on ads without the user’s intervention.

In short, the app was now bad news and destroyed its credibility and trust. The problem is that you can still sideload the APK file for ES File Explorer. The ability to sideload potential malware is one of the key reasons Google has added a 24-hour delay before you can sideload an app.

s26 ultra product image

Brand

Samsung

SoC

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Get the new Galaxy S26 Ultra with AI smarts and an all-new privacy display. It’s big, powerful, packed with AI, and you’ll love the S-Pen stylus. 


Modern Android doesn’t need third-party file managers the way it used to

Standard doesn’t mean bad

Files By Google file manager on a Google Pixel 10a next to a keyboard. Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

It’s strange how we can get used to certain apps being a fact of life. We learn that some apps are good to have by reputation. It must be why some people still have ES side-loaded on their phones. But the truth is that Android has come a long way and so have the phone makers who customize it for each phone brand and model.

The standard file explorer app that comes with your phone is perfectly adequate for 99% of anyone’s needs. Third-party file explorers for Android are only justifiable for power users at this point, and ES File Explorer hardly qualifies by modern standards. In fact, there are several features that make Android’s default file manager better than third party alternatives.

There are safer alternatives that do the same job without the baggage

There’s no reason to take a chance

If you really must use a different file explorer, then there are far better choices that come without the baggage. There are several open-source Android file managers that don’t spy on you and don’t show you ads. Fossify File Manager is a great place to start, but there are many more options.

Generally, if an app is on the official Play Store, then it’s most likely not harmful thanks to Google’s Play Protect technology. Given how much access we give file explorer apps though, it’s a good idea to do some research on a new app before installing it.


Hanging on to old Android apps is becoming a broader security problem

Having an old app like ES Explorer still knocking around on Android phones today is a symptom of a larger problem. One part of it is just human nature. We like familiar things. We stick to brands and interfaces we know. However, that’s an issue because the owners of the brand can change hands. Alternatively, the idea might always have been to abuse a trusted relationship by providing software that’s genuinely good to get an install base, and then opening the slop gates.

Android itself has become much more security conscious to make up for our lapses. Old apps that you never deleted eventually lose their privileges, apps that have unusual new patterns are flagged. But even so you still need to do your part for your own protection.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If you are a book purist, you might scoff when I recommend an e-reader instead of buying physical books, and I won’t blame you. The allure of the smell of pages, the weight of the book in my hands, the whole ritual, is hard to resist. 

However, if you allow me some leeway to convince you, there’s a strong argument to be made against physical books and in favor of using e-readers. So let me make the case for e-readers, because once you understand what you’ve been missing, it’s hard to go back.

Your entire library fits in your bag

This is the most obvious advantage, but it doesn’t get enough credit. I always read more than one book at a time, and carrying two or three physical books around is not realistic. Thick books alone are a chore to carry.

With an e-reader, you carry hundreds of books in a slim package. Switching between titles takes a second. If you travel frequently, this alone is reason enough to make the switch.

A thousand-page hardcover is great for your bookshelf but terrible for your commute.

Fat books are a workout, not a reading experience

If, like me, you are into fantasy books, you know they can be a behemoth to handle. You have to constantly shift how you’re holding it, find a way to keep it open, and somehow also stay comfortable. Thin books are fine, but the moment a book crosses a certain thickness, it starts working against you.

An e-reader weighs the same regardless of whether you’re reading a short novel or a massive fantasy series. That’s it. Whether I am reading The Count of Monte Cristo or the next book in Brandon Sanderson’s The Stormlight Archive series, my Supernote Nomad remains the same. 

Reading at night without waking anyone up

I do a lot of my reading at night, and this is where physical books completely fall apart for me. Lamps and book lights never feel comfortable. The light is never quite right, and if you share a room with someone, the whole setup becomes a problem.

Most e-readers, including Kindles, have a built-in backlight that you can dim to whatever level feels right. You can even switch to warm light mode, making it easier on your eyes. 

I’ve read at 3 AM with the brightness all the way down, and it felt completely natural. No lamp and no squinting required. 

Look up any word without losing your place

English is not my first language, and even for native speakers, encountering an unfamiliar word in the middle of a chapter is common. With a physical book, your options are to grab your phone and look it up, which almost always leads to distraction, or skip it and lose a bit of meaning.

On a Kindle or most other e-readers, you tap the word and the definition appears instantly. You can translate it, add it to a vocabulary list, and get back to reading in seconds. I look up far more words now than I ever did with physical books, and my reading comprehension is genuinely better for it.

Taking notes you’ll actually use later

I used to annotate physical books with a pen, and those notes would just sit there on the page, never to be seen again. Transferring them somewhere useful took more effort than I was ever willing to put in.

With my Supernote Nomad, I can use its Digest feature to clip what I am reading and quickly add any additional handwritten notes. I can then export those notes to Obsidian and process them. 

If you use any e-reader, highlighting a passage and adding a note will take a couple of seconds. Most e-readers also aggregate all your highlights and notes in one place, allowing you to quickly riffle through your notes without flipping pages. 

With physical books, my notes died on the page. With an e-reader, they became something I actually use.

Since these are digital notes, you can process them into your note-taking app to further digest the material.

Books are cheaper and easier to buy

Buying physical books is always more expensive than getting the digital version. Also, since most publishers are phasing out mass-market paperbacks, we are left with trade paperback and hardcover options, which may look better but also cost significantly more.

E-books don’t have that problem. I have purchased several books at less than half the price I would have paid for a physical version. Also, most of the time, e-books are on sale, making them even more affordable. 

And when you find a book you want to read at midnight, you don’t have to wait for a delivery or drive to a store. You buy it and start reading immediately. The convenience is hard to overstate once you get used to it.

Should you switch?

If you love the experience of physical books, the covers, the smell, the shelf aesthetic, that’s a completely valid reason to stick with them. There’s nothing wrong with it. I myself am curating my own bookshelf, and there will always be a place for those special books. 

But for convenience and ease of discovery and reading, I recommend you at least invest in one e-reader. It’s also one of the best times to buy them, as you can get good options around $100

Since these are e-readers, you don’t even need to upgrade them as often as your phone. If you don’t accidentally break them, they can easily last 5-6 years, making them worth the investment.



Source link