I replaced my Pixel phone’s camera app with this open-source alternative


Pixel phones are known for their cameras, but the stock camera app isn’t perfect. The image processing is quite heavy, and there’s little manual control if you want to experiment. I recently started using Open Camera, a free open-source alternative, and I’m now getting even more from my Pixel’s camera.

Open Camera gives me more natural-looking photos

Less processing and more control

The Pixel camera app is great for point-and-shoot photography and produces reliably impressive results. But it’s very limited if you want more control. It’s fallen well behind most other Android manufacturers, including Samsung and Nothing, as well as Chinese brands like Vivo, that have far more powerful camera apps. Whether you want manual controls or to tweak the colors and processing in real time, they will often offer it in a way that Google doesn’t.

If you’re happy with a simple setup and like the way the Pixel camera processes its images, then there’s no reason to change. In some cases, I am. But I sometimes find the processing way overdone, and as someone who owns an actual camera as well, I often find it too basic. So I keep Open Camera installed alongside it.

Open Camera is free and open-source. It’s rammed with settings and options, and produces images with noticeably less processing. In a simple comparison, the photos it takes are softer and less detailed because it relies far less on computational photography than the Pixel app.

Open Camera takes a more old-fashioned approach. There’s no denying that, in some cases, especially in low-light conditions, the results are worse than what the Pixel will do. In other cases, the results are better. In contrasty scenes, for example, the app keeps the shadows instead of having HDR flatten them all.

Pixel 10

Brand

Google

SoC

Google Tensor G5

Looking to upgrade to a Pixel but not sure if you need all the bells and whistles of the more expensive models? You won’t be disappointed with the standard Pixel 10 model. Coming in striking colors, Gemini features, and seven years of updates, you can’t go wrong with this purchase.


The app performs perfectly on the Pixel hardware. It’s very responsive, and there’s close to zero shutter lag, so it doesn’t feel like a compromise when using it. But the manual controls make for a totally different experience from Google’s simpler approach.

Open Camera contrasty scene.

The main controls let you adjust the exposure, focus, white balance, ISO, and more, and the app is almost endlessly customizable. You can change interface buttons, sounds, gestures, long-press actions, and the screen layout so that it perfectly matches your workflow.

This doesn’t mean the app is only for advanced users. All the expected point-and-shoot features are in place, and then some. So, you get a host of photo modes for things like HDR, panoramas, and night shooting. You also get face detection, hands-free use, and a very clever Auto-Level option that automatically crops the image so that the horizon is straight, even when your aim is a little off.

But for simple shooting, I often stick to the Pixel Camera. Open Camera really comes into its own when you delve into the more advanced settings.

It’s packed with features most camera apps ignore

Burst mode, time-lapse, and more

There are too many niche features in Open Camera to list them all, but there are some standouts.

I love the fast burst mode that shoots up to 20 frames in rapid succession. It’s ideal for capturing action or shooting storms. There’s also a highly configurable time-lapse mode, where you can choose how many shots to take and the interval between them, from half a second to two hours. Aside from the obvious creative uses—you can capture a sunset so easily—I also used it to try and see what wildlife was coming into my backyard.

Open Camera with focus and exposure guides.

In keeping with the “real camera” concept, you can do exposure and focus bracketing, where you take three shots with different settings in quick succession. You can view an onscreen histogram to help with exposure, and you can also add overlays to help. Adding zebra stripes on the preview shows overexposed areas, and focus peaking lines show what’s in focus if you’re doing it manually.

There are several autofocus modes, too, including a macro mode, continuous focusing, and infinity focus. The options are truly comprehensive.

So many more useful touches

The small touches are what make it so good

In addition to the big features, the attention to detail is also impressive, and it’s evident in some of the smaller things. Some of my favorites are the auto-straightening feature I already described, being able to use the camera while the phone is locked, an onion-skinning style feature called “Ghost Image” that makes it easy to recreate variations on the same shot, and the ability to create custom EXIF tags.

Open Camera RAW options.

Best of all, I like that I can shoot in RAW-only mode, rather than RAW+JPEG like in the Pixel app. Processing those images in the new Snapseed app is truly a mobile take on my old mirrorless camera+Lightroom desktop setup.


Open Camera is the photographer’s camera app

Open Camera doesn’t replace everything that the Pixel camera app does best, especially the bits that rely on computational photography like Night Sight. It also has a bit of a learning curve. Although it’s easy to use, the app has so many options that it can be hard to find the ones you want.

But if you want more natural-looking images rather than the bright, ultra-crisp shots that the Pixel generates, or you want more control—either as an enthusiast or simply to bring in some of the features you might find on other phones—then Open Camera is hard to beat.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link