I held off on the MacBook Neo. I hope the next one fixes these 5 papercuts before I plonk cash


The MacBook Neo stopped me in my tracks, not because it’s a beautiful piece of tech that appeals to the enthusiast inside me. It’s the overall pitch that Apple puts on the table — aluminum build, efficient silicon, and great battery life — all at an implausible price tag of $599. I wanted to experience it, and I almost bought it a couple of weeks ago. 

But I didn’t. And it wasn’t because Neo is a bad machine. I got to experience the device for a couple of days (thanks to my friend who splurged his money on it), and the more I dug into what Apple had left out to hit the astonishingly low price, the more I felt like pushing my purchase until the Neo gets better. 

5 things I want the next MacBook Neo to fix

Because here’s the thing: I get most of the trade-offs. What I don’t understand, however, is why some of the cuts were made in the first place, as they’re more about snatching away the iconic MacBook experience than saving costs for the company. So, dear Apple, fix these five things on the next MacBook Neo, and I’ll have my wallet out before you guys start accepting pre-orders. 

Spec MacBook Neo (2026)
Chip Apple A18 Pro (6-core CPU, 5-core GPU)
RAM 8GB unified memory (not upgradeable)
Storage 256GB / 512GB SSD
Display 13-inch Liquid Retina, 2408×1506, 500 nits, 1 billion colors
Battery Up to 16 hours
Ports 2x USB-C (left: USB 3, right: USB 2)
Camera 1080p FaceTime HD
Connectivity Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth
Starting Price $599 ($499 education)

A19 Pro could help push the performance ceiling

For a first-generation device, the MacBook Neo does really well with Apple’s A18 Pro chip (borrowed from the iPhone 16 Pro, with one less GPU core). I was surprised at how well it handles everyday tasks like browsing, emailing, and, most importantly, multitasking with a dozen different Chrome tabs. 

But here’s why I pumped the brakes. The A18 Pro holds its own at day-to-day tasks, but due to the lack of additional cores compared to the M-series, it runs behind in intense workflows like photo editing, graphic designing, or even coding.

This is where a better, more powerful chip could help the Neo up its game, not just for immediate gains, but to keep the Neo relevant for the next four or five years, especially as AI-driven tasks would require even more computational power

The good news? Apple is already working on putting the A19 Pro (from the iPhone 17 Pro) inside the next iteration, and I’ll take that all day. The chip brings meaningful upgrades across the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine, and should enhance the overall Neo experience.

It’s Apple’s optimization that’s doing the heavy lifting here, not 8GB of RAM

I’ll give credit where it’s due. It isn’t just the 8GB of physical RAM on the MacBook Neo doing the heavy lifting. It’s Apple’s iron grip over hardware and software optimization (including temporary swap-in memory) that makes browsing, streaming, and general multitasking feel like a breeze on the Neo.

However, the moment I pushed it by running multiple apps simultaneously, like Chrome (with over two dozen active tabs) with Apple Music, and added FaceTime to this combination, the memory ceiling became apparent. Unlike a Windows laptop, where upgrading RAM is an option, with MacBooks, what you buy is what you live with.

In my opinion, the device is aimed squarely at first-time laptop buyers: students, new professionals, and people looking for a secondary on-the-go device, and it serves them quite well. But with the unavoidable memory slowdown, 8GB of RAM isn’t going to cut the mustard forever.

For me, more RAM doesn’t just solve the immediate multitasking bottleneck; it solves the longevity problem, too. Fortunately, the A19 Pro chip is rumored to bring 12GB of unified memory as a standard on the next Neo, and that should’ve been the baseline from day one.

I type in the dark every single day

While the other things are not immediately apparent, this one baffled me right when I unfolded the thing for the first time. The Neo skips the backlit keyboard, a feature so standard in 2026 that even budget Windows laptops don’t think twice about it.

Apple’s workaround is the color-matched keyboard with lighter keys across all four finishes, and sure, the display’s glow does a decent job of illuminating the keys. However, it’s no workaround for a good old backlit keyboard, which even my M1 MacBook Air has, not only because it looks cool at night, but because it makes finding the function keys a whole lot easier. 

I can’t stress enough how much a backlit keyboard would help the Neo’s target audience: students working on assignments late at night, frequent travelers working on the go, in dimly lit plane seats or train compartments, or people like me, who’d rather work outside at night than be cooped up indoors. 

The trackpad doesn’t feel like it’s on a MacBook

One of the most distinctive aspects of MacBooks, a hallmark of every MacBook for nearly a decade, is the haptic trackpad. It was one of the features that wowed me before my first-ever MacBook purchase, and calling it anything but iconic would be a mistake. And the Neo, somehow, doesn’t have it. 

Instead, it has a mechanical trackpad that clicks like a budget Windows laptop or Chromebook, and that’s exactly what I’ll never expect or accept, not from Apple. Don’t get me wrong, though. The Neo’s trackpad works just fine, but the moment you use it after using another MacBook, the difference is impossible to miss.

And while we’re at it, paywalling Touch ID on a higher storage tier is something that didn’t sit well with me either, but I’ll let it pass given that it isn’t something I use as often as the keyboard and the trackpad.

The USB 2 port doesn’t come in handy while transferring files

It could be while someone is trying to offload their iPhone’s data on the MacBook, or getting pictures or videos of a vacation via an external storage drive, that Neo users would notice how tremendously slow the USB 2 port on the device is (the one closer to the trackpad). 

And it adds up faster than anyone would think. Even a 20GB iPhone backup that takes minutes via a USB 3 connection will have you wait for about half an hour on USB 2. For people who are always working, trying to be productive around the clock, that feels like the deepest cut. 

I’m not asking for a Thunderbolt port, but both ports running at USB 3 speeds is, in my opinion, a reasonable ask in 2026. 

Feature Current State on Neo What’s Needed
Chip A18 Pro, binned from iPhone 16 Pro A19 Pro for better CPU, GPU & Neural Engine performance
RAM 8GB, fixed — no upgrade path 12GB as a baseline, not a premium tier
Keyboard Backlight No backlight — color-matched keys as a workaround Standard backlit keyboard, like every other MacBook
Haptic Trackpad Mechanical click trackpad, no Force Touch Force Touch haptic trackpad — an iconic MacBook staple
USB-C Ports Left: USB 3 / Right: USB 2 (effectively decorative) Both ports at USB 3 speeds minimum

Bottom line

None of these things is a dealbreaker at $599, and not even a question at $499 with education pricing. To Apple’s credit, the Neo is one of the most impressive first-generation devices I’ve seen and used in a long time.

Clearly, it’s the years of experience in making MacBooks that help the company. What annoys me, however, is when the Neo starts feeling like it’s one-upping the competition rather than staying true to its Apple roots. 

The chipa nd RAM upgrades are already rumored, and I’m cautiously excited about them. But if anyone at Apple is reading this, please bring back the backlit keyboard, haptic trackpad, and bring both ports to the same USB 3 standard. Do that, and the next MacBook Neo will have something more than my attention — my money.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link