I found an AirTag alternative unlike any other – it doesn’t even use Google or Apple’s networks


img-1606.jpg

Seeed Studio’s SenseCAP T1000-E tracker card

pros and cons

Pros

  • Compact yet fully featured tracker card.
  • It’s more than just a tracker card — it has a full mesh client built inside.
  • The app unlocks many features, and the card can be flashed with different firmware.
Cons

  • The battery lasts two or three days.
  • It uses a proprietary magnetic charging cable.
  • It’s a deep rabbit hole that can sometimes have a steep learning curve.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Apple AirTags were a total game changer for me. Being able to pinpoint and locate things like keys and wallets, wherever they are in the world, has saved me no end of heartache, headaches, and wasted time. And the proliferation of third-party tags means that there are all sorts of tags for all sorts of applications.

Also: I hid 4 Bluetooth trackers (including AirTags) to test their reliability – here’s how Android rivals compared

But the one drawback is that all the tags rely on cellular and Wi-Fi networks. What if you could get tags that operated on their own networks and could operate independently of the networks built by multibillion-dollar corporations? That’s exactly what the Seeed Studio’s SenseCAP T1000-E tracker card offers.

OK, how does this work?

And with most things, there are a lot of things I like about the T1000-E, and a few things I don’t. But before I go any further, let me warn you that this card could very well be a gateway drug that pulls you into the huge world of LoRa mesh.

LoRa stands for Long Range Radio and is a long-range wireless radio protocol that can be used to create a mesh.

Also: I found an AirTag alternative that’s twice as durable and works with Android phones

What’s a mesh?

It’s an open-source, off-grid, decentralized mesh network designed to run on small, low-power devices. It doesn’t need cell towers or the internet. It’s a completely stand-alone, peer-to-peer radio system. If you’re a bit like me and love getting your teeth into weird things, you’ll soon be hip-deep in mesh transceivers and setting up solar-powered nodes.

Why? Because you can.

Note: Make sure you get the T1000-E, and not the A or B variants. Only the E is designed to work with peer-to-peer mesh, and the A and B variants make use of LoRaWAN networks and require their own network gateways.

It's super thin!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

OK, back to the T1000-E. This is a card-sized tracker much like all the others. It’s credit card-sized and the thickness of a bunch of cards. Inside is a 700 mAh battery that’s good enough to power the card for a couple of days, along with all the tech wizardry to do all the communication and location magic.

Also: I put away my AirTag just minutes after trying this Bluetooth tracker alternative – here’s why

There’s a super-loud buzzer, an LED status light, and a button to turn the unit on and off and control things like Bluetooth.

Built for the apocalypse

The shell is IP65 rated for dust and water intrusion, so it’s fine being out and about in the great outdoors. I like this a lot, but to achieve this level of dust and waterproofing, the manufacturer has opted for a magnetic charging pad on the back that uses pogo pins.

IP65 means that dirt and water are no problem for the T1000-E.

IP65 means that dirt and water are no problem for the T1000-E.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Not only does this mean that you need a proprietary cable every time you need to charge the device, but the design means that if you try to charge the card while on the move (by, say, using a power bank), there’s a good chance that it’ll come loose and stop charging. I’ve come up with solutions using elastic bands or hot glue, but I wish there was a better way to keep the connector attached.

It’s a great tracker

By default, you’ll need to download the SenseCraft app (iOS/Android) to set up and control the T1000-E.

Setting up a new T1000-E using the SenseCraft app.

Setting up a new T1000-E using the SenseCraft app.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The app is OK, but not great. The instructions can be a bit vague, sometimes you’ll stumble across bits that are in Chinese, and it’s also trying to sell you more stuff (something that I hate in an app for a product that I’ve bought). My advice is that if you get stuck, hit the extensive support documentation wiki (complete with videos), or head over to the excellent r/meshtastic over on Reddit.

Also: I took apart the new AirTag 2 and found a serious flaw in Apple’s popular tracker

If you just want to use the tracker as a tracker, you’ve pretty much done everything you need to do. The app has a map that shows you the location of the card, or you can use it to beacon your position to others when out and about by sharing your location. The card will use Bluetooth to connect to the app on the smartphone, but it can also connect to LoRaWAN, Meshtastic, Amazon Sidewalk, and Helium networks.

Also: My new favorite AirTag alternative fits perfectly in my wallet – and is seriously durable

If you live in an area where there are people using mesh, that’s going to be a great option that just works. You might decide to put nodes up for you to use around your home or work, extending the mesh for everyone. I found that Amazon Sidewalk was also a really good, workable option, especially in built-up areas. After all, there are a lot of Amazon devices and Ring cameras out there, so there’s a pretty big mesh you can leverage.

The app has a lot of features, including tracking.

The app has a lot of features, including tracking.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Loads of options. And yes, this could work in those apocalyptic scenarios where the power goes down, the cellular grids go quiet, and the zombies start to shuffle about.

I’ve carried it in a pocket, bag, and strapped to the outside of my rucksack, and the GPS receiver is excellent even under subpar conditions. There’s a lanyard slot on the card for attaching it to things.

But there’s more … a lot more!

But there’s a lot more to the T1000-E. It’s a lot more than a tracker card. It’s a fully functional mesh transmitter that can be used to send and receive messages between other devices. If you want to get into this, then you’ll need another mesh device (say, another tracker or a mesh transceiver). And this is where you start the slide into mesh obsession.

Also: I slipped this stealthy $15 tracker into my favorite jacket – now it’s an everyday essential

You can also mess with the card on a deeper level. For example, you can dump the firmware that Seeed Studio loaded onto the T1000-E, and install stock Meshtastic firmware onto it using the online flasher tool.

I flashed Meshtastic firmware onto the T1000-E.

I flashed Meshtastic firmware onto the T1000-E.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Now you can use the Meshtastic app (iOS/Android) to control the card, and I found this to be a whole lot better, especially if you want to go deeper into the card’s capabilities. This is well beyond what I can go into here, but if you want something to get you started, this video will probably kick-start your obsession!

ZDNET’s buying advice

The Seeed Studio’s SenseCAP T1000-E tracker card will set you back around $50. You’ll sometimes see it for a lot more, but avoid those. Usually, if you wait a day or so, the prices will come down.

Also: These are the closest things to AirTags for Android users (and better in some ways)

For a pure tracker card, that’s a pretty hefty price tag, but once you realize that it can be a messaging client and you can use it to send and receive messages for free, it starts to feel more reasonable. Mesh is great for off-grid comms and also for places like cruise ships, where the company will charge you an arm and a leg for Wi-Fi.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


“It was severely downgraded,” Gilbert confirms. “I never would have found it if I was just looking through Google results.” (I tried the same prompt in Gemini earlier this month, and after an initial denial, the tool also gave me Eiger’s number.)

After this experience, Eiger, Gilbert, and another UW PhD student, Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, decided to test ChatGPT to see what it would surface about a professor. 

At first, OpenAI’s guardrails kicked in, and ChatGPT responded that the information was unavailable. But in the same response, the chatbot suggested, “if you want to go deeper, I can still try a more ‘investigative-style’ approach.” Their inquiry just had to help “narrow things down,” ChatGPT said, by providing “a neighborhood guess” for where the professor might live, or “a possible co-owner name” for the professor’s home. ChatGPT continued: “That’s usually the only way to surface newer or intentionally less-visible property records.” 

The students provided this information, leading ChatGPT to produce the professor’s home address, home purchase price, and spouse’s name from city property records. 

(Taya Christianson, an OpenAI representative, said she was not able to comment on what happened in this case without seeing screenshots or knowing which model the students had tested, even after we pointed out that many users may not know which model they were using in the ChatGPT interface. She also declined to comment generally about the exposure of PII by the chatbot, instead providing links to documents describing how OpenAI handles privacy, including filtering out PII, and other tools.) 

This reveals one of the fundamental problems with chatbots, says DeleteMe’s Shavell. AI companies “can build in guardrails, but [their chatbots] are also designed to be effective and to answer customer questions.”

The exposure issue is not limited to Gemini or ChatGPT. Last year, Futurism found that if you prompted xAI’s chatbot Grok with “[name] address,” in almost all cases, it provided not only residential addresses but also often the person’s phone numbers, work addresses, and addresses for people with similar-sounding names. (xAI did not respond to a request for comment.) 

No clear answers

There aren’t straightforward solutions to this problem—there’s no easy way to either verify whether someone’s personal information is in a given model’s training set or to compel the models to remove PII. 



Source link