I compared the two best Android camera phones in 2026 – and it’s surprisingly close


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is one of the best phones you can buy right now. However, outside the US, it is facing tough competition from Chinese ultra phones, the latest being Vivo’s X300 Ultra. 

It takes on the Samsung phone with a camera system that’s packed with not one or two, but three massive sensors. I was curious how it’d compare to the Galaxy S26 Ultra, so I took the two phones on a photowalk. While I expected Vivo to perform better, Samsung surprised me in a few areas.

Before I dive into the results from both devices, here’s an overview of how their specs compare.

By the numbers

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera 200MP (OIS, PDAF), 1/1.3″ sensor with f/1.4 aperture and 23mm focal length 200MP (OIS, Laser autofocus, PDAF), 1/1.12″ sensor with f/1.9 aperture and 35mm focal length
Telephoto Cameras 1. 50MP (Periscope tele, OIS, PDAF), 1/2.52″ sensor with f/2.9 aperture and 5x optical zoom
2. 10MP (Telephoto, OIS, PDAF), 1/3.94″ sensor, with f/2.4 aperture and 3x optical zoom
200MP (Periscope tele, OIS, PDAF), 1/1.4″ sensor with f/2.7 aperture telemacro capabilities and 3.7x optical zoom
Ultrawide camera 50 MP (Ultra-wide, PDAF), 1/2.5″ sensor with f/1.9 aperture 50 MP (OIS, PDAF), 1/1.28″ sensor with f/2.0 aperture

Main camera results

Starting with the main camera, Vivo changed its focal length to 35mm this year, so you get optical quality instead of relying on 1.5x digital zoom. Comparably, most other modern phones, like the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, have a smaller 23mm equivalent focal length on the main sensor. Fortunately, you can always set 35mm as the default on the Vivo, if you prefer it.

Also: I compared the 100x zoom cameras on Samsung, Google, and Motorola phones – this model won

I find myself zooming in at 1.2x and 1.5x for my day-to-day shots, so I loved shooting on the Vivo X300 Ultra. However, there were times when I missed having 23mm by default (on the Vivo phone, you can use the ultrawide-angle lens and zoom in to shoot at 23mm).

Overall, I don’t think one is objectively better because it depends on what you’re shooting, but I enjoyed shooting with Vivo more.

Leaves and flowers shot in 1x on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

1x shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET.

Leaves and flowers captured on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

1x on the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

I took this photo as an example because of the layers in this frame and the added purple patch with those flowers. On both of these Ultra phones, you get to choose a tone (warm or cool) when you set up the device.

Once set up, the difference in look comes down to the sensor and processing. On the above shots in 1x, the X300 Ultra gave me more depth — thanks to a bigger sensor — whereas the Galaxy S26 Ultra shot suffered from oversharpening.

A garden filled with green leaves and yet-to-bloom flowers.

1.5x on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

A garden with green leaves and yet to bloom flowers.

1x on the Vivo X300 Ultra

I wanted to demonstrate the difference in 35mm-equivalent optical and digital quality. In the above frame, I didn’t need further compression of the background, so I relied on the main camera.

Also: I tested Motorola’s $1,500 Razr Ultra, and it’s so close to being my dream flip phone

The 1x on the Vivo X300 Ultra gave me the perfect frame, whereas to achieve the same on Samsung, I had to go to 1.5x digital zoom, which captured fewer details and produced a noisier photo (see the reds of the yet-to-bloom flower). The bigger sensor also allowed Vivo to add a natural bokeh to this shot.

Prakhar Khanna's photo shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 1x shot

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Prakhar Khanna's photo shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Coming back to my earlier point about not picking a focal length objectively over the other one: I’d want to have Galaxy S26 Ultra’s 23mm over Vivo’s 35mm in this case because of the background. I like the Samsung framing better because it can keep the arc in the background at the same position as in the Vivo shot.

While it got my skin tone right, the Galaxy phone struggled with colors of the sky and ground. It looks rather gloomy. Vivo, on the other hand, lacks details in the sky but has better clarity and rich details, at least on my face.

A garden with green bushes and purple and green leaves.

1x on the Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

A garden with green bushes and purple and green leaves shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

All of my photos here are tap-and-shoot — without manually adjusting the exposure or other settings. The Vivo X300 Ultra gave me more contrast, character, and details in its 1x shot, as compared to the Galaxy S26 Ultra, which looks overexposed and lacks the same amount of detail.

Mumbai's local market shot in the night using the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra night shot in 1x

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Entry of Mumbai's local market at night shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Night mode shot in 1x from the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

In night mode, I prefer Samsung’s saturated colors over Vivo’s look. You can get more saturation on the Vivo X300 Ultra by adjusting the filter (I was using Natural, but Textured would give you a more dramatic look) but Samsung has more contrast, which I especially love on the signboard.

Telephoto and ultrawide

Prakhar Khanna's portrait shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

5x portrait shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Prakhar Khanna's portrait shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

85mm portrait shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Portraits shot on the tele sensor have a more natural bokeh on the X300 Ultra. It also managed to retain a close-to-real-life look (and got the correct color tone of my eyes), while the Galaxy S26 Ultra went for a warmer look.

Also: Samsung vs. Motorola: I’ve tested dozens of phones from both brands – here’s my choice

For the pixel-peepers, Vivo retained more details on my beard, whereas, again, Samsung oversharpened certain areas. However, Samsung handled the highlights on my white T-shirt better.

Prakhar Khanna's portrait shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra portrait shot in sunlight

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Prakhar Khanna's portrait shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Vivo X300 Ultra portrait shot in sunlight

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

The photos above were taken at sunset. In these portrait shots, Samsung handled the sunlight on my face more comfortably. While it lacks the detail in the shadows, the Galaxy S26 Ultra gave me a more natural-looking sunset portrait. I noted this in my Galaxy Z Fold 7 review too; Samsung takes great portraits under the setting sun and beats Vivo here.

Telemacro shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Telemacro shot on the Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

telemacro shot of a small flower.

Telemacro shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Vivo easily wins in telemacro shots. This was a tricky subject because the small flower kept moving in the slightest breeze. I had to struggle getting it in focus with the Galaxy S26 Ultra. In comparison, the Vivo X300 Ultra focused on it with a single tap and even captured those white threads in the picture.

Also: I camera tested the latest Google, Samsung, and Honor phones while flying – this model won the most

I zoomed in further to 10x and Vivo gave me this:

A small flower shot with 10x zoom macro capabilities on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

10x zoom macro shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

I don’t have a Galaxy S26 Ultra shot to compare because it couldn’t focus at 10x digital zoom.

Trees in ultrawide angle shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Ultrawide shot on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Trees in ultrawide angle shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Ultrawide shot on the Vivo X300 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Both phones have a good ultrawide camera. The colors remain consistent throughout the lenses on both Samsung and Vivo, but the latter offers richer details, yet again. However, I like the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s shot better in this case because Vivo overexposed the sky.

Writer’s choice

Both the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra have their strengths, weaknesses, and unique capabilities, but the latter will better satisfy photographers. 

Samsung might be enough for most people (it has a friendlier user interface, for example), but I preferred the X300 Ultra. The Vivo gives you more character, allows for easy color profile switching, and the big sensors capture greater detail.

Also: How I turned my old Android phone into a Wi-Fi extender – and fixed dead spots at home

The fun part extends to video recording as well. Vivo offers a film mode that mimics the look of a movie with a single tap. Moreover, if you’re into Fujifilm or Ricoh recipes, you can create an equivalent of those looks and share them among friends with a QR code. I haven’t seen any other phone manufacturer making these things so simple.

I’ve used all the Ultra phones launched this year and would pick the Vivo X300 Ultra for its cameras. In my opinion, it is the best camera phone of 2026.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


macOS has a built-in screenshot tool that gets the basics right. You can take a screenshot, record your screen, and even annotate your captures. But the moment you want something more, like scrolling capture, advanced annotation tools, or a quick way to share your screenshots via a link, it starts to fall apart.

That’s where CleanShot X comes in. It’s a powerful screenshot and screen recording app for Mac that replaces the built-in screenshot tool. It feels as if the developers looked at the screenshot features in macOS and added everything that was missing.

Over the past few years, the app has added several new features I didn’t know I needed until it offered them. It has become one of my favorite Mac utilities, and in this article, I will show you its features that will convince you to buy the app instantly. 

Scrolling capture saves you from stitching screenshots together

One of the most frustrating limitations of macOS’s screenshot tool is that it can only capture what’s visible on your screen. If I need to capture a long webpage or a full chat history, I am stuck taking multiple screenshots and stitching them together. That wastes an unbelievable amount of time. 

CleanShot X solves this with its scrolling capture feature. I can trigger the scrolling capture, and CleanShot X automatically scrolls through the content and delivers a single image. I don’t even have to manually scroll the page if I don’t want to.

This feature alone saves me hours of time every month. If you have to deal with long screenshots, you should definitely try it out. 

Time delay capture lets you screenshot the impossible

Some screenshots are tricky to take because they require you to trigger something before capturing. For example, sometimes the on-screen feature you want to capture disappears as soon as you use a keyboard shortcut or click anywhere with your mouse. 

Sometimes, the on-screen elements appear for a short time, and by the time you hit the screenshot shortcut, they disappear. CleanShot X’s time delay capture gives me a few seconds to set things up before the screenshot is taken. I trigger the capture, put everything in place, and CleanShot X does the rest. 

It’s a small feature that solves a genuinely annoying problem.

Capture text from images with OCR

I love that CleanShot X has a built-in OCR function. It lets me capture text directly from any image or video on my screen. Although it happens rarely, I have come across websites that don’t let me copy content. With CleanShot X’s OCR function, that’s not an issue. 

I use this constantly when reviewing PDF documents with restricted permissions or watching a video on YouTube. It is far faster than typing things out manually, and it works surprisingly well. There are many apps that let you capture text with OCR, but since CleanShot X has this feature built in, I don’t need to install an extra app. 

Add beautiful backgrounds to your screenshots

If you share screenshots for work, tutorials, or social media, you know how plain a raw screenshot looks. CleanShot X lets me add beautiful backgrounds to my screenshots, turning a flat capture into something that looks polished and share-ready.

For backgrounds, I can choose from solid colors, gradients, or even my current desktop wallpaper. I can also adjust the padding and shadow, align the screenshot to the edges, and adjust the corner radius. It takes a few seconds and makes a huge difference in how professional your screenshots look.

Annotation tools that get the job done

While macOS’s screenshot tool lets you annotate your screenshots, the annotation tools inside CleanShot X are, in my opinion, the best available on the Mac. 

I can add arrows, text labels, shapes, highlights, and more. I can also change the weight and color of annotations. There are also multiple arrow styles I can choose from. I especially like the curved arrow style that lets me curve the arrows and make them pop. 

One of my favorite new additions is the “Highlighter” tool. It snaps to the text in a screenshot, which makes it really easy to highlight it before sharing. 

Then there’s the “Spotlight” tool that highlights your selection by darkening the rest of the screenshot. It’s perfect for drawing someone’s attention to a specific part of a screenshot. 

No matter what annotation tools you need, you can find them and more in CleanShot X. 

Hide sensitive information before you share

You can find hundreds of instances in the news where a prominent figure shared a screenshot and inadvertently revealed private information. Thankfully, CleanShot X has a dedicated tool to blur or black out sensitive information, so such accidents never happen.

I can choose to pixelate, blur, or completely black out the information. The best part is that I can also adjust the strength of these effects. It lets me blend in the hidden information so the blur doesn’t stand out from the rest of the screenshot. 

Video and GIF recording built right in

CleanShot X also lets you record your screen as a video or export directly as an optimized GIF. The GIF export is particularly useful for sharing quick demos or showing someone how to do something without creating a large video file. 

It can record the entire screen, a specific window, or a custom region. It can also show my mouse clicks and keyboard shortcuts. I can record my computer audio, my microphone, and webcam video. 

I love that it automatically adds the webcam video in the corner, so it doesn’t interfere with the rest of the recording. I can also change the video size and shape. All these features make it really easy to create video tutorials. 

Quick share with cloud links

Once you take a screenshot or finish a recording, you need to share it. Of course, you can easily share screenshots via messages or emails. But CleanShot X gives me a better way. 

Whenever I capture something, it opens a quick share overlay. I can use it to instantly upload my screenshots to CleanShot Cloud and grab a shareable link with a single click.

I no longer have to drag files into cloud storage, attach images to emails, or upload to third-party services. I capture it, click share, and paste the link. It is one of those workflow improvements that sounds minor until you use it every single day.

Capture beautiful screenshots with CleanShot X

CleanShot X has become one of my most dependable apps on Mac. In fact, all the screenshots you see in this article or any of my articles have been captured using CleanShot X. Yes, it’s a paid app, but it has paid its cost multiple times over with the time it has saved me. 

CleanShot X is available as a one-time purchase or through a SetApp subscription. If you want unlimited cloud storage, you have to pay for a monthly subscription. That will also get you advanced features like a custom domain and branding, password-protected link sharing, and more. 

For most users, the one-time purchase is more than enough, and it’s what I use. If you spend any time taking screenshots or recording your screen on a Mac, it is absolutely worth every penny.



Source link