I asked Bluetooth reps about why our devices don’t always connect properly – and learned the hard truth


Bluetooth settings on iPhone

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Bluetooth dual device connectivity, aka “multipoint,” isn’t an official feature or spec.
  • It’s an application of Bluetooth technologies, and each manufacturer wields it differently.
  • Further migration from Bluetooth Classic to LE Audio promises improvements.

Bluetooth multipoint is a key selling point used by headphone and earbud manufacturers to entice consumers. This feature allows one pair of headphones to maintain individual connections with two (sometimes three) devices and switch audio between them without manually unpairing and re-pairing devices.

Also: What is Bluetooth 6.0? How the latest standard fixes audio problems we’d learned to live with

However, this feature can be unreliable, disconnecting from the device you want to stay connected to or injecting audio from the device you don’t want to hear. There’s a reason for this inconsistent behavior: multipoint, as presented to consumers, isn’t an official feature or specification of Bluetooth. The term is mostly marketing-speak.

I spoke with Henry Wong, director of market development at Bluetooth SIG, to understand how multipoint works, how it doesn’t, and whether further shifts from Bluetooth Classic to LE Audio can address its shortcomings.

How does Bluetooth multipoint work?

Sonos Ace multipoint

Sonos refers to dual device connection as “Multipoint.”

Jada Jones/ZDNET

If a manufacturer allows for it, many headphones and earbuds can maintain a simultaneous connection with two source devices, such as a smartphone and a laptop. These are individual, one-to-one Bluetooth connections, but you can alternate between the two without disconnecting and reconnecting your devices.

This feature is often called Bluetooth multipoint, but since it’s not an authorized Bluetooth feature, there’s no official name for it, which is why Apple calls it Seamless Device Switching.

Also: I spoke with Bluetooth reps about the future of connected audio, and it’s cooler than I expected

“[Bluetooth multipoint] is not a specification,” Wong says. “Multipoint is an application of Bluetooth features that manufacturers are building on top of the Bluetooth toolbox, if you will.”

Momentum 5 multipoint

Sennheiser refers to dual device connection as “Multipoint.”

Jada Jones/ZDNET

To further understand Bluetooth multipoint connectivity, you need to understand Bluetooth profiles. As Wong explains, you can think of Bluetooth as a giant toolbox, and profiles as the tools inside. 

Manufacturers can choose which Bluetooth profiles, codecs, and features to implement in their devices, and each profile serves a different wireless function. A wireless mouse and wireless earbuds don’t need the same profiles.

Bluetooth-enabled headphones generally support a number of profiles:

  • Handset Profile (HSP): Enables basic wireless functionality between headphones and a source device.
  • Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP):  Enables wireless stereo audio streaming.
  • Hands-Free Profile (HFP): Enables wireless two-way voice calling.
  • Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP): Enables headphones acting as a wireless remote to control audio play/pause and volume on your paired device.

Also: Are you following the 60-60 rule with headphone listening? Your future self will thank you

Say you have a pair of headphones connected to both your laptop and phone. While using the headphones to watch YouTube on your laptop, A2DP and AVRCP are active. Then you get an incoming call on your phone, and your headphones should prioritize HFP to answer it. 

However, a frustrating example is watching YouTube on your laptop with headphones, only for your connected smartphone to interrupt your video every time you get a notification. Notifications can trigger HFP, briefly interfering with your stream. This interruption isn’t a bug; it’s simply how the Bluetooth technology works.

Why is multipoint sometimes unreliable?

WH-1000XM6 multipoint

Sony opts for “Connect to 2 devices simultaneously” instead of “Multipoint.”

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Since Bluetooth multipoint isn’t an official Bluetooth feature, but rather an application of Bluetooth profiles, how these profiles interact is up to manufacturers. For example, if you have a pair of Sony headphones connected simultaneously to a Lenovo laptop and an iPhone, it’s unclear how the headphones decipher which connection to prioritize.

An incoming call will trigger the HFP to ring your phone’s ringtone in your ear. Staying connected to your phone while answering the call, or automatically disconnecting and reconnecting to your other media player, is where it can get tricky, and where differences across manufacturers are to blame.

Also: I connected a Bluetooth Auracast receiver to my TV, and it’s a worthwhile home audio upgrade

“If you buy Brand A headphones, Brand B laptop, and Brand C tablet, those are different manufacturers, different Bluetooth chipsets, and different Bluetooth stack applications,” Wong says. “So, being able to switch between them isn’t consistent, in most cases.”

A mismatch in your intention and your headphones’ behavior can be attributed to simply mixing connectivity between three different manufacturers, none of which optimize Bluetooth for the other’s devices.

“Depending on your headset, how it manages logic and the priorities of these different use cases is really up to the manufacturer,” Wong says. “That is why you can have inconsistency between these devices.”

Why device switching works in a closed ecosystem

AirPods Pro 3 and iPhone 16

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Apple and Samsung have closed device ecosystems, and both stray from the term “multipoint,” instead opting for differentiated branding terms — Seamless Device Switching and Dual Audio, respectively. In these closed ecosystems, one manufacturer has complete control of how its devices communicate via Bluetooth.

“These companies do these [connection] transitions very well, and they don’t even call it ‘multipoint’ because it’s not really a feature, but it’s how they built it on top of the Bluetooth,” Wong says.

Also: Why a Bluetooth upgrade for AirPods excites me more than cameras or AI

This uniform level of control allows companies like Apple and Samsung to experience minimal friction, dropouts, and unreliability when switching Bluetooth connections. Like every other manufacturer, these connections use basic, standardized Bluetooth technologies for discovery and connection initiation, but proprietary tweaks to the user experience are the key, according to Wong.

“These are individual connections, but how they determine which one to switch to next is the moneymaker of this feature,” he says. “They have that magic behind the scenes to make it seamless.”

How LE Audio can help

XM6 LE Audio on Pixel 9 Pro

LE Audio Auracast on the Google Pixel 9 Pro.

Jada Jones/ZDNET

The Bluetooth profiles used for multipoint connections rely on the Bluetooth Classic radio, the original version of Bluetooth connectivity that launched in the late 1990s. As an older technology, in a headphones context, it delivers poorer audio quality, less stable connections, and consumes more power than the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocol.

Since Bluetooth multipoint is not an official Bluetooth feature, there’s no replacement or direct improvement of it wrapped into BLE or LE Audio. However, the introduction of modern profiles, such as the Telephony and Media Audio Profile (TMAP) and Basic Audio Profile (BAP), succeeds A2DP, HFP, and HSP in improving connection transitions between phone calls and media playback, delivering higher fidelity, and reducing power consumption.

Also: How I turned my old Android phone into a Wi-Fi extender – and fixed dead spots at home

Aside from committing to closed ecosystems, there aren’t any decisions consumers can make to guarantee a smoother multipoint experience. Bluetooth SIG has stressed this point throughout our conversations: Manufacturers have sole discretion over which Bluetooth features are available in a pair of headphones or earbuds, and their marketing materials typically don’t specify which profiles, which versions of those profiles, or how they work.

Consumers’ best hope is that manufacturers will continue to adopt LE Audio, not just BLE. BLE alone cannot stream audio, while LE Audio brings modern audio features, such as the LC3 codec, Auracast, and TMAP, that can better accommodate current complex audio streaming demands.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I consider myself part of many fandoms. Some are from my childhood, others from college, and now, as a young adult, but they all mean something to me on some level. One of those just happens to be Star Wars.

For years, I have adored the Star Wars franchise, mainly because I grew up on those movies. But I must admit, the best Star Wars film isn’t one of the classics from the 1970s and 1980s. No, it’s actually a rather new one—and it’s time you gave it the praise it deserves.

Rogue One is the best Star Wars movie by far

It simply can’t be beaten

Jyn Erso in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story speaking to someone. Credit: Lucasfilm

So hear me out.

What are my credentials to say this? Really, none except for the fact that I grew up watching the entire franchise, as I’m sure most people reading this article did. I am a fan whose brother was obsessed with Luke Skywalker and Han Solo and whose father would meticulously quote Yoda as if he were real. I was raised on Star Wars, both the Star Wars movies and TV shows.

So I must admit that I’ve watched the first movies a few times, the prequel films many times, and, of course, the sequel movies. And they’re all great. Trust me. They are. But to me, Rogue One, otherwise known as Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, is the best film in the series.


Star Wars logo.


8 Classic Star Wars Games Every Fan Should Play At Least Once

Enjoy these games, you will.

You can’t really surpass some of the iconic moments that have cemented themselves into movie history from the originals, such as the legendary reveal of Darth Vader being Luke’s father, Han and Leia’s love exchange, and, of course, the epic lightsaber fights that happen in both the original films and the prequels.

But I think what makes Rogue One the best Star Wars film is that it’s the perfect movie set in the Star Wars universe, with a plot that matters without trying to be anything else. It doesn’t aim to become bigger than it originally was—a story about a group of rebels who begin the entire story of A New Hope thanks to what they did.

The characters make it so much more enthralling

My favorite ones come from here!

I think what really stands out in Rogue One is the memorable characters. One was so memorable and beloved that Disney created a critically acclaimed TV show about the character. That’s how you know they were good.

But they weren’t just well-written characters with complex backstories and interesting comedic bits. They were likable. I feel like a lot of Star Wars characters fall into an unlikable trap.

There are plenty of characters who are likable and memorable, but I’m not entirely sure their stories are as fleshed out, so we see their flaws much more easily. I honestly think a big reason fans didn’t like Rey as much was that her story didn’t feel as well-told. They tried to make her bigger than she needed to be—her original story, of just being a random girl with the Force who had no connection to anything else, felt a lot more original than her being a granddaughter of Palpatine.

That’s what makes Jyn Erso (played by Felicity Jones), the main protagonist of Rogue One, so good. Yes, she is the daughter of an Imperial scientist, but she doesn’t have any powers, secret abilities, or anything like that. She’s a rebel who aims to help and is very human and flawed but does her best. Those traits are carried out throughout every character we meet in Rogue One, including Cassian Andor (Diego Luna).​​​​​​​

The action and special effects are top-tier

The BEST blaster fights

A ship explodes from bombs in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Credit: Lucasfilm

I know for a fact that the sequel films fell into a bad rhythm with their action. It didn’t feel as well-choreographed or as well-executed as the special effects in previous films. But with Rogue One? It never feels like that.

I honestly believe it’s because the movie is more grounded in war than in epic space battles and moving things with the force all the time. It’s about a group of humans and droids who are trying to work together to bring an end to the Empire. Most of them don’t really have powers, and that leads to some really well-done sequences that feel real in ways where even we could relate to them.

Of course, there’s that epic final scene of Darth Vader basically destroying and killing everyone with his skills and the force, but that doesn’t feel pushed into the story. That feels authentically woven into the storyline and done in a way that shows his power and how it connects to the overall story. That’s an effective way to use that kind of power.

War-focused action with a little hint of those special effects made this so much better.

The original films are still great, but just not my favorite

Jyn and Cassian have my heart

I’m not saying I don’t love the original Star Wars movies because that is not the case. I love the originals and the sequels with a heavy passion. There’s a reason why most Star Wars board and card games are centered around those characters—we love them because we grew up with them.

From a theatrical perspective, with its compelling story, well-developed characters, and impressive effects, Rogue One stands out as the supreme leader of the series. I genuinely cannot find a fault in this film within the grand timeline of the Star Wars universe, and honestly, I wish we got more of movies like this.

Grounded Star Wars feels so much more relatable, and I think that’s a big reason why Rogue One is successful. As much as we love the powers and the Force and epic lightsaber fights, we would all most likely be like Jyn or Cassian, rebels trying to fight for the greater good. And I think that’s beautiful.

Either way, we’ll still be getting plenty of new Star Wars content soon, including a Darth Maul show, apparently. Maybe something new will surpass Rogue One. But for now, I doubt it. And if you haven’t seen Rogue One, you should check it out on Disney+.

Subscription with ads

Yes, the Disney Basic plan

Simultaneous streams

Up to 4




Source link