GM’s wild new Hummer concept proves automakers might build cars differently in the future


When Harley Earl arrived at General Motors in 1927, he brought Hollywood with him. Born and raised in Los Angeles, Earl spent his early career building custom cars for movie stars before GM tapped him as its first design director. He went on to pioneer clay modeling as a tool for shaping vehicles, a practice the industry still relies on nearly a century later.

It is fitting, then, that GM has now opened a major new advanced design campus in Pasadena, California, and marked the occasion with a concept that pushes well beyond what clay alone could produce.

The new Pasadena studio spans 148,000 square feet across three buildings and is home to about 100 designers, sculptors, fabricators, and artisans. It is fully equipped for full-size clay modeling and digital collaboration, serving as GM’s primary hub for conceptual design.

The focus is on work that looks past current production programs to ask what vehicles could look like a decade or two from now. Hussein Al Attar has been named the studio’s director, taking over from Brian Smith, who returns to the Chevrolet Corvette design team in Michigan.

To open the studio, GM revealed the GMC HUMMER X, a pickup and SUV concept pair designed to test new ideas in manufacturing, materials, and off-road capability. Neither is headed to production. Instead, they are design and engineering studies that may hint at GM’s future direction.

FLEX FAB and its future implications

Automakers may build cars differently in time

The most technically interesting element of the HUMMER X concept is something called FLEX FAB, a manufacturing approach that could reshape how automakers think about body panel production.

Traditional automotive manufacturing relies on large, expensive stamping tools to press sheet metal into body panels. Each tool is designed for a specific part, which means any design change requires new tooling. That makes the process slow and costly, two things the automotive industry writ large tries to avoid.

FLEX FAB works more like industrial 3D printing, but for metal. It enables small-batch, on-demand production of metal panels without the need for dedicated stamping tools. The same equipment can produce multiple designs, which opens the door to far greater variety and faster iteration (two things the automotive industry writ large wants).

For the HUMMER X concepts, FLEX FAB accounts for 57% of the body’s components in both the truck and SUV configurations. The resulting aesthetic is direct and functional, with flat surfaces, clean edges, laser-welded seams, and exposed precision bolts. There is nothing decorative about it. The look follows from the process, and the process is the point.

If FLEX FAB were ever to reach production, it could allow automakers to offer more configuration options without the manufacturing overhead that typically makes such variety cost-prohibitive. It could also shorten product development timelines. For now, it is only a proof of concept, but a compelling one nonetheless.


Young man locking a car in the driveway


Gen Z would rather own a car than a house, and the sound system is the dealbreaker

Expectations start inside the cabin more than anywhere else for members of Gen Z.  

HUMMER X concepts and the “builder maker”

Old-school car enthusiast approach

GMC Hummer X Credit: GMC

Even setting aside the manufacturing story, the HUMMER X makes a strong impression as a vehicle concept. Although it would be amazing to see it in production, maybe we will get lucky, and GM will at least send it on the auto show circuit, as it has done with its current Hummer models.

Both pickup and SUV configurations are built around a modular platform designed for serious off-road capability. Ground clearance on the SUV is 13.2 inches, with approach and departure angles of 44 and 46 degrees, respectively. The truck version offers 12.5 inches of ground clearance and an approach angle of up to 41.5 degrees.

Goodyear tires and 22-inch aluminum beadlock wheels are standard, which help give the HUMMER X its signature look. While the SUV variant rides on 37-inch rock tires, the truck version has a set of 35-inch street tires. Multimatic shocks, a GM staple, are complemented by robust underbody protection.

On the inside, stackable displays let drivers arrange their digital setup based on how they’re using the vehicle at that moment, whether that’s exploring a remote trail or merging onto a busy highway.

GM describes the intended buyer as the “builder maker,” someone who modifies and customizes their vehicle, turns wrenches, and takes part in a wider car community. It’s an old-school car enthusiast approach for sure, though the “builder maker” mentality may help bring new people into the hobby of vehicle ownership.

To serve that customer, the design team created the HUMMER HUB, a suite of connected apps that includes a scout drone. The drone can fly ahead on a trail, send real-time terrain data back to the driver, and dock itself when not in use. It’s a new school approach if there ever was one.

Escort MAX 360c MKII

Radar Band Detection

X, K, Ka

Companion App

Drive Smarter

The Escort MAX 360c MKII is the follow-up to the standard MAX 360c radar detector. This enhanced version features longer-range detection with its updated dual-antenna platform and increased false alert filtering through Blackfin DSP integration.


Sustainable material strategy

Morse code on the floor

GMC Hummer X Credit: GMC

The design team focused on what they call mono-materials, replacing adhesives and multi-material assemblies with snap fits and mechanical fasteners made from a single material throughout.

The goal is to make parts actually recyclable rather than theoretically recyclable. Several interior components, including seatbacks, headrest backs, and instrument panel ends, are made from recycled car bumper fascias. Parts are also designed to be swapped, shared, and recirculated.

Tucked throughout the concept are a few intentional details. The team’s working mantra, “Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints,” is encoded in Morse code on the floor. The tire treads spell out the same phrase in full. These are small touches, but they speak to how thoroughly the concept was imagined and developed.


What the Pasadena studio represents

The new campus is the latest chapter in nearly 40 years of GM Design in Southern California, building on the same regional tradition that Harley Earl helped establish. GM’s global Advanced Design network also includes studios in Detroit, the United Kingdom, and Shanghai. The Pasadena facility is now a key part of that.

The studio’s purpose is to look ahead, not just to the next model year, but to the next generation of what mobility could mean. The HUMMER X concept, with its flexible manufacturing, circular materials strategy, and modular off-road platform, reflects that mandate. Whether any of it reaches production in recognizable form remains to be seen, but the HUMMER X is a clear statement of where GM’s West Coast design operation is headed.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link