Galaxy phones have a one-handed mode that actually works—it’s just buried where nobody looks


Samsung Galaxy phones, like all other Android phones, come with a regular one-handed mode. It works, but it only goes so far. While it can help you use your phone with one hand, it’s fairly limited and doesn’t offer any extra features.

But Samsung also offers an advanced one-handed mode for its phones, although you have to go out of your way to access it. It’s called One Hand Operation+, and it can be a proper game-changer for how you use your Galaxy phone, as long as you stick with it and go through the learning process, which can be a bit steep.

The default one-handed mode on Galaxy phones is serviceable

It’s just as basic as they come

Your Galaxy phone comes with a regular one-handed mode you can access by opening Settings, going to Advanced features, and then selecting One-handed mode. You can launch it by swiping down in the center of the bottom of the screen or by double-tapping the Home button if you’re using navigation buttons.

All it does is shrink the entire screen down, allowing you to navigate your phone with one hand. You can position the screen left or right, move it up or down, and resize it to fit your preferences and the length of your fingers. I used it occasionally back when the Galaxy S21 FE was my main phone, but I didn’t find it super helpful because the screen was tiny, and the keyboard was so cramped that typing anything aside from a few short words was an exercise in frustration.

While helpful in a pinch, the default one-handed mode leaves plenty of room for improvement. The good news is that Galaxy phone owners have access to another one-handed mode that’s supercharged with features and allows you to control your phone with one hand while keeping the screen size intact.

One Hand Operation+ is an advanced one-handed mode every Galaxy phone owner should check out

It’s extremely powerful, but it comes with a steep learning curve

One Hand Operation+ isn’t available on Samsung Galaxy phones by default. In other words, you won’t find it in Settings. Instead, it’s part of Samsung’s Good Lock customization suite, but it’s also available as a standalone app you can download from the Play Store. Once you install it (or download it via Good Lock), you’re greeted with a plain-looking settings screen that masks its extremely useful but quite complex functionality.

The premise is simple enough: you have two handles placed on opposite sides of the screen, each supporting up to six gestures in total. You’ve got an assortment of short swipes (straight, diagonal up, and diagonal down) along with the same set of long swipes, which are entirely optional. You can then assign any of the almost 50 available actions to each of the three swipes. Add long swipes and you can have up to six actions mapped to each handle, making up a dozen actions in total.

You can change the size of the two handles, as well as their position, and tweak the width of the touch area that responds to swipes. You can also enable visual cues that show the position of the handles anywhere in One UI, making them easier to use. There’s also the option to add another set of handles, which increases the maximum number of actions you can map to 24.

This may sound daunting, and it kind of is. If you plan to learn the ropes, I have to warn you that the learning curve is steep, and the adjustment period will likely include a ton of wrong swipes until you build up the necessary muscle memory. But once you get the hang of it, you’ll realize that One Hand Operation+ is an extremely powerful tool that allows you to perform almost any action on your phone with just one hand while keeping the screen size intact.

You can open apps, access Quick Settings and the notification panel, activate split-screen mode, grab screenshots, create custom shortcuts inside the app, and so much more. I recommend using color cues until your fingers know where the handles are and it becomes second nature. Then you can add another set of handles and double the number of potential shortcuts.

The sky’s the limit with One Hand Operation+, and it all boils down to how long you’re prepared to stick with it. If you persevere and build up muscle memory, you’ll never need to use your other hand to control your phone again. While Samsung made a bit of a mess with the menus (as is the case with most Good Lock modules), it also created a robust and powerful tool that can become so handy you’ll never want to move to another phone again.


Samsung yet again proves it’s the king of customization on Android

Stuff like One Hand Operation+ is the reason why I still keep my Galaxy S21 FE handy and use it as a secondary phone for an odd day or two. I love the amount of work Samsung has been putting into Good Lock and its modules, and the sheer level of freedom it gives you to tinker with your phone and customize every aspect of One UI to your heart’s content.

No other phone brand does it quite like Samsung, which is why there’s a good chance I’ll switch back from Pixel to Samsung sooner or later, even though I recently found a similar app you can use on Pixel phones. Good Lock is that good.


A person holding a Samsung smartphone with multiple floating edge panels displayed around the screen, showing widgets, tools, and app shortcuts


This powerful Samsung feature is hidden in plain sight

It’s right there on the edge.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link