Forget the BMW X6—this Infiniti fastback feels just as premium for $23K less


The BMW X6 effectively created a new category when it arrived in 2008. By blending the higher seating position of an SUV with the sloping roofline of a sporty coupe, it challenged the idea that a utility vehicle had to look like a box.

While the X6 is a long-standing benchmark for German “Sports Activity Coupes,” the 2027 Infiniti QX65 enters the market as a spiritual successor to the Infiniti FX, a vehicle that was experimenting with the same aggressive and athletic proportions as far back as 2003.

The 2027 QX65 represents a continued move toward energetic yet attainable luxury for Infiniti. It showcases the next evolution of Infiniti’s Artistry in Motion design language, with styling cues similar to those of other Infiniti SUVs, like the three-row QX60 and QX80. The new Sunfire Red paint is a tribute to the Nissan GT-R, its vibrant finish featuring genuine gold-coated glass flecks.

At first glance, it may seem odd to compare an Infiniti to a BMW. Yet while the BMW remains a powerhouse of German engineering, the QX65 offers a similar on-road presence and premium interior for a lower starting price.


2027-infiniti-qx65-exterior-6.jpg

infiniti-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

2.0-L Turbo Inline 4

Base Trim Transmission

9-speed automatic

Base Trim Drivetrain

All-Wheel Drive



Style without the luxury tax

Over a $20K difference between the two

The most striking difference between these two is the price of entry.

The 2026 BMW X6 xDrive40i starts at $78,750, including destination. Meanwhile, the 2027 Infiniti QX65 starts at $55,535 (including destination), leaving a price gap of more than $23,000 between the two. BMW primarily offers a more powerful six-cylinder engine and the prestige of the M Sport styling that comes standard on the X6 for the additional money.

However, when you look at the technology and comfort features, both vehicles offer a remarkably similar experience. Both the X6 and the QX65 come standard with all-wheel drive, a 12.3-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a suite of safety tech like blind-spot monitoring and automatic emergency braking.



















Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

Infiniti QX65 trivia
Read on and test your knowledge

From its sleek coupe styling to its performance roots — see how much you know about the Infiniti QX65.

DesignPerformanceHistoryFeaturesRivals

What was the Infiniti QX65 originally named before it was rebranded?

Correct! The QX65 was originally sold as the FX35 and FX50 before Infiniti overhauled its naming convention in 2014. The ‘QX’ prefix was adopted across Infiniti’s SUV lineup to create a more consistent brand identity.

Not quite. The QX65 traces its lineage directly to the FX35 and FX50, which were rebranded when Infiniti restructured its entire model naming system in 2014. The JX35 was actually the precursor to the larger QX60.

Which body style best describes the Infiniti QX65’s distinctive silhouette?

Correct! The QX65 is known for its dramatic sloping roofline that gives it a coupe-like profile, setting it apart from more upright SUVs. This styling choice prioritizes aesthetics and a sporty look, though it does limit rear headroom compared to traditional SUVs.

Not quite. The QX65’s signature trait is its fastback-style sloping roofline, which gives it the appearance of a sporty coupe blended with an SUV. This design language was inspired by concept cars and made the FX/QX65 a head-turner when it launched.

What engine powered the top-spec Infiniti QX65 in its final production years?

Correct! The range-topping QX65 used a naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V8 engine producing 390 horsepower, offering brisk performance for a luxury crossover. This engine gave the QX65 genuine sports car credentials to match its sporty looks.

Not quite. The top-tier QX65 was powered by a 5.0-liter V8 delivering 390 horsepower. The more common variant used a 3.7-liter V6, but the V8 model was the performance flagship of the lineup.

In what year did Infiniti discontinue the QX65?

Correct! Infiniti discontinued the QX65 after the 2017 model year, ending a nameplate that had been in production since 2003. Its cancellation made room for Infiniti to focus on newer crossover models and evolving consumer preferences.

Not quite. The QX65 was discontinued after 2017, concluding a production run that began back in 2003 under the FX name. The model had a loyal following, but shifting market trends led Infiniti to retire it.

Which advanced driver assistance technology was available on the Infiniti QX65?

Correct! The QX65 offered Infiniti’s InTouch infotainment system along with the Around View Monitor, which stitches together camera feeds to give a bird’s-eye view of the vehicle. This was considered a cutting-edge parking aid when it debuted on Infiniti models.

Not quite. The QX65 featured Infiniti’s own InTouch system paired with the Around View Monitor, a surround-view camera system Infiniti was among the first to popularize. Technologies like Autopilot and Super Cruise belong to Tesla and GM respectively.

Which vehicle was considered the QX65’s closest direct competitor in the luxury sport crossover segment?

Correct! The BMW X6 was the QX65’s most direct rival, as both vehicles shared the same coupe-crossover concept with a sloping roofline and performance-oriented character. The two were frequently compared by automotive journalists throughout their shared production years.

Not quite. The BMW X6 was the natural rival to the QX65, since both pioneered the sporty coupe-SUV formula with dramatic rooflines and rear-biased styling. The Escalade and Navigator compete in a different full-size luxury SUV segment entirely.

Who is credited as the chief designer behind the original Infiniti FX concept that led to the QX65?

Correct! Shiro Nakamura served as Nissan and Infiniti’s design chief and was the creative force behind the bold FX concept that evolved into the QX65. His vision for expressive, emotional design language helped shape Infiniti’s identity for decades.

Not quite. Shiro Nakamura was the influential design head at Nissan and Infiniti who championed the daring FX concept styling. Chris Bangle is associated with BMW’s controversial designs, while Peter Schreyer became famous for his work at Kia.

What type of drivetrain was standard on most Infiniti QX65 models sold in North America?

Correct! All-wheel drive was standard on the QX65 in North America, sending power to all four wheels for improved traction in varied conditions. The system was tuned with a performance bias, reflecting the QX65’s sporty character rather than serious off-road capability.

Not quite. North American QX65 models came standard with all-wheel drive, which suited the crossover’s blend of sporty driving and everyday practicality. The QX65 was never intended as a serious off-roader, so a locking differential system was unnecessary.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

The QX65 makes its case by offering features like Google built-in and NASA-inspired Zero Gravity seats as part of its base value, both of which are standout features of the three-row QX60.

While the BMW is undoubtedly faster and more athletic, the QX65 provides the same fastback curb appeal and a high-tech cabin without the $23,000 premium. For most, that extra money might be better kept in the bank rather than spent on horsepower that rarely gets used during a 7:00 am commute.

Turbo hybrid vs. turbo gasoline

Hands-off highway driving systems

Under the hood, these two vehicles take very different paths to get you moving. The BMW X6 xDrive40i uses a 3.0-liter inline-six turbo engine, producing 375 horsepower and 383 lb-ft. of torque, which can be boosted to 398 lb-ft. for short periods thanks to the mild-hybrid system.

One of the most interesting facts about BMW’s powertrain is the integration of that 48V mild-hybrid system. The setup includes an electric motor integrated directly into the eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission, providing an additional 12 horsepower and 147 lb-ft. of torque to help the X6 pull away from a stoplight or have an extra burst during mid-range acceleration.

Meanwhile, the 2027 QX65 leverages Nissan’s Variable Compression Turbo (VC-Turbo) engine, which produces 268 horsepower and 286 lb-ft. of torque. The VC-Turbo is paired with a nine-speed automatic tuned for more direct off-the-line performance.

As the name VC-Turbo suggests, the inline-four engine performs real-time compression ratio adjustments while driving for the best possible power delivery and fuel economy. The design comprises a multi-link system that raises or lowers the pistons in real time in response to the driver’s inputs.

When properly equipped, the 2027 QX65 offers a max towing capacity of 6,000 lbs., not quite as much as the X6 at 7,200 lbs.

When not towing, BMW’s Highway Assistant allows for hands-free travel at speeds up to 85 mph and even features a “gaze-confirmed” lane change system. Infiniti’s ProPILOT Assist 2.1 offers a similar hands-off experience for highway cruising, using a driver-facing camera to help you stay attentive.

Milwaukee M12 FUEL 3-piece tool kit.

What’s Included

M12 impact driver, hammer drill, 3/8-inch ratchet, charger, two batteries

Cordless?

Yes

If you’re looking for a great DIY starter kit from Milwaukee, this M12 3-tool combo kit is it. With an impact driver, hammer drill, and 3/8-inch ratchet, along with a 4Ah and 2Ah battery, this kit is a great starting point for projects both at home and on your vehicle. 


Factory warranty coverage

Infiniti wins on powertrain duration

Every BMW X6 has a four-year/50,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty, which covers the powertrain and electronic systems under a single umbrella for that length of time. By contrast, the 2027 Infiniti QX65 uses a split-coverage approach:

  • Basic Coverage: Infiniti covers the whole vehicle, bumper-to-bumper, for four years or 60,000 miles.
  • Powertrain Coverage: Infiniti provides a separate, extended safety net for the engine and transmission that lasts for six years or 70,000 miles.

While BMW offers the simplicity of covering everything at once, Infiniti ensures that the most expensive mechanical components remain protected through that fifth year and even into the sixth.


Side-by-side comparison of the Infiniti QX60 and QX65.


Infiniti QX60 vs. QX65: Why you’re paying more for fewer seats

Mechanical twins with different personalities.

Practicality in a coupe silhouette

Infiniti comes out ahead

One of the biggest knocks against the crossover-coupe segment is that you usually have to trade away utility for that sporty, sloping roofline. BMW’s design is aggressive, but it results in a cargo area that can feel a bit tight. The 2027 Infiniti QX65 manages to keep its fastback style without forcing you to leave all your gear behind.

  • BMW X6 Cargo Space: Behind the second row, the X6 offers 27.4 cubic feet, which expands to a maximum of 59.6 cubic feet with the rear seats folded.
  • Infiniti QX65 Cargo Space: The QX65 provides a more generous 35.8 cubic feet behind the second row, offering up to 67.7 cubic feet when the second row is folded.

QX65 vs. X6 bottom line

If performance and the prestige of a traditional luxury namesake are important to you, the BMW X6 is an impressive piece of machinery, as one would expect any BMW to be. However, if you want a stylish fastback for less money out the door, the 2027 Infiniti QX65 is a smarter move.

By offering a similar aesthetic and a longer warranty for roughly $23,000 less, Infiniti has created a compelling case for skipping the “luxury tax” without feeling like you’ve skipped the luxury.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link