Europe plans a wide social media ban for children


Europe is taking its biggest step yet toward keeping kids off social media entirely. A panel of experts today handed the European Commission a report recommending sweeping new age restrictions, according to a New York Times report. Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is expected to turn those recommendations into a formal law proposal in September.

What the proposal aims to restrict

The report lays out three tiers for social media access across different age groups. It recommends keeping kids under 3 off screens entirely and banning social media access for kids under 13, unless a parent or teacher is supervising them. Teens between 13 and 18 would still be given access, but only on platforms that build in guardrails against compulsive use, such as limits on infinite scrolling that give feeds a natural stopping point.

The report was authored by child psychiatrist Jörg Fegert and epidemiologist Maria Melchior, who were appointed to the panel by von der Leyen herself. According to Reuters, von der Leyen framed the push in personal terms, saying, “Our children need time in the real world. Time to play, time to build friendships, time to make mistakes. Time to shape their own identity, their own personality, before an algorithm shapes them instead.”

Von der Leyen also pointed to the scale of the problem. European kids are logging four to six hours a day on social media, she said, and close to 60 percent report emotional or psychological struggles tied to their time online. Her comments echo a broader global shift underway, with more than 20 countries now weighing or enforcing their own age limits. Even in the US, where no federal ban exists yet, public support for one is building.

Enforcement will be the real test

Even if the EU passes a law, keeping kids off social media apps will be challenging. Australia’s under-16 ban, often cited as the model other countries are chasing, has struggled with the same problem. Age checks are easy to fake, and most restricted teens have found workarounds within months.

The EU isn’t just leaning on new legislation to restrict social media use. Regulators are also putting pressure on companies to change what they call the “addictive design” of their platforms. Whether that has more tangible benefits than a straight-up ban is still in question.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link