Ericsson is leaving Kista for central Stockholm, in the largest office lease in Swedish history



The 71,000-square-metre Hagastaden campus, signed with Atrium Ljungberg and Castellum, ends more than two decades in the suburb once branded Sweden’s Silicon Valley.


Ericsson is moving its global headquarters out of Kista. The Swedish telecoms-equipment maker said on Monday that, starting in 2028, it will gradually relocate its Stockholm operations, including the HQ, R&D functions, group functions, and the Imagine Studio showcase space, to a new city campus in the Hagastaden district, north of central Stockholm.

The numbers attached to the move are substantial. Across new leases with Atrium Ljungberg and Castellum, plus a Castellum agreement Ericsson signed earlier for the Infinity property, the company will occupy roughly 71,000 square metres in Hagastaden across six buildings.

Atrium Ljungberg’s portion alone, three buildings totalling 58,000 square metres on a 15-year contract, is described by the landlord as the largest office lease in Swedish history and the largest known office deal in Europe so far this year.

Annual rent to Atrium Ljungberg lands at about 360m kronor ($39m) at 2026 levels.

Castellum’s new pieces, the 9,500-square-metre Emerald House and the 3,500-square-metre Jubileumshuset, carry an annual rental value of roughly 80m kronor, according to the company’s release.

That sits on top of the 24,000-square-metre Infinity contract Castellum signed previously, expected to be ready by late 2027.

Börje Ekholm, Ericsson’s chief executive, framed the move in talent terms.

“With a vibrant location in the heart of the city’s technology collaboration and innovation community, including easy access to our changing business ecosystem, partners and decision makers, Hagastaden is clearly best-placed to address our future operations,” he said in the company’s statement.

“A thriving city campus will also strengthen our attraction for the top talent of the future.”

The translation is that the Kista calculation no longer works. The suburb in northern Stockholm has spent thirty years marketing itself as Sweden’s Silicon Valley, with Ericsson’s presence as the central evidence.

That story has been deteriorating for several years. Office vacancy rates in Kista ran at 26.7% in the first quarter of 2026, more than double the central Stockholm rate, according to Colliers data cited by Bloomberg.

The facility-management firm Coor Service Management announced its own departure from Kista in late 2024, citing security concerns; reports of organised-crime activity in the surrounding area have become a recurring feature of Swedish business coverage.

Ericsson’s lease did not name those factors, but the campus calculus is unmistakable.

The deal is a clear positive for the two landlords. Atrium Ljungberg shares rose as much as 5.1% on Monday, the most since April 8, and Castellum gained 2.1%.

Pareto Securities analyst Viktor Byrenius told Bloomberg the agreements were “a sign of strength” for Atrium Ljungberg, which has been working through elevated vacancy across the Stockholm region.

The Hagastaden lease materially shifts that occupancy story for the next decade and a half.

For Ericsson, the move comes against a quieter recent set of financial prints. The company narrowly missed Q1 profit estimates in April, as the North American 5G upgrade cycle that drove 2024 and early 2025 began to unwind.

Headcount in Sweden has been declining; the company cut roughly 1,200 jobs locally last year.

The Hagastaden campus is being designed for a smaller, denser, more central operation than the sprawling Kista footprint it replaces, which is its own form of strategy statement.

Move-in is phased and slow. Ericsson said the process will begin in early 2028 and run for several years.

The Infinity building is due late 2027; the rest of the Hagastaden campus is still under construction, on a deck built above one of the city’s major highways. By the time the relocation is complete, Ericsson’s last fixed link to Kista will, in practical terms, be gone.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


“It was severely downgraded,” Gilbert confirms. “I never would have found it if I was just looking through Google results.” (I tried the same prompt in Gemini earlier this month, and after an initial denial, the tool also gave me Eiger’s number.)

After this experience, Eiger, Gilbert, and another UW PhD student, Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, decided to test ChatGPT to see what it would surface about a professor. 

At first, OpenAI’s guardrails kicked in, and ChatGPT responded that the information was unavailable. But in the same response, the chatbot suggested, “if you want to go deeper, I can still try a more ‘investigative-style’ approach.” Their inquiry just had to help “narrow things down,” ChatGPT said, by providing “a neighborhood guess” for where the professor might live, or “a possible co-owner name” for the professor’s home. ChatGPT continued: “That’s usually the only way to surface newer or intentionally less-visible property records.” 

The students provided this information, leading ChatGPT to produce the professor’s home address, home purchase price, and spouse’s name from city property records. 

(Taya Christianson, an OpenAI representative, said she was not able to comment on what happened in this case without seeing screenshots or knowing which model the students had tested, even after we pointed out that many users may not know which model they were using in the ChatGPT interface. She also declined to comment generally about the exposure of PII by the chatbot, instead providing links to documents describing how OpenAI handles privacy, including filtering out PII, and other tools.) 

This reveals one of the fundamental problems with chatbots, says DeleteMe’s Shavell. AI companies “can build in guardrails, but [their chatbots] are also designed to be effective and to answer customer questions.”

The exposure issue is not limited to Gemini or ChatGPT. Last year, Futurism found that if you prompted xAI’s chatbot Grok with “[name] address,” in almost all cases, it provided not only residential addresses but also often the person’s phone numbers, work addresses, and addresses for people with similar-sounding names. (xAI did not respond to a request for comment.) 

No clear answers

There aren’t straightforward solutions to this problem—there’s no easy way to either verify whether someone’s personal information is in a given model’s training set or to compel the models to remove PII. 



Source link