Dropbox wanted $10 a month for 2TB, so I built my own cloud storage with these 4 self-hostable apps


Over the course of the years, a recurring cloud storage subscription can easily cost hundreds or even thousands of dollars. And what does that subscription fee get you? A finite amount of storage and convenient access whenever you want it.

However, if you have an old PC lying around, it is entirely possible to self-host something that goes toe-to-toe with Dropbox or any other cloud service for a relatively small upfront cost. After all, basic cloud file storage isn’t necessarily complicated, it just needs to be reliable. Luckily, you can get by with all free software to bring your very own server together.

Nextcloud is the all-in-one Dropbox replacement

It is a full self-hosted productivity suite

Nextcloud is an open-source platform that handles file sync and sharing across desktops, mobile devices, and browsers. In many ways, it goes above and beyond what Dropbox does, since you can add extra apps that give you calendars, contacts, notes, and more. If you’re already committed to leaving Dropbox for a self-hosted solution, it is a pretty straightforward switch that is actually a bit of an upgrade.

The easiest way to install Nextcloud is via the Docker image, which handles all of the complicated stuff automatically behind the scenes. All you have to do is direct it to your sync folders using the app for your operating system, and you’re good to go.

Tip: If you’re going to access this via the internet, regardless of the method, I’d recommend using two-factor authentication (2FA) of some kind.

Nextcloud can bog down slower hardware, so if you don’t need the features, or you’re using a low-power device, I’d recommend skipping it or installing it last.

Storage Capacity

8TB

Cache

Up to 256MB

A great CMR hard drive for extra storage or backup.


WireGuard gives you secure access to everything from anywhere

No reverse proxy or domain name require

Of course, if you’re self-hosting a Dropbox replacement, it needs to be accessible to you anywhere at any time. My go-to solution for access to my home lab is WireGuard.

WireGuard is an open-source VPN protocol that sets up an encrypted tunnel between your remote device and your home network. Once you connect, your laptop or phone behaves as if it were connected too your home Wi-Fi, allowing you to reach every self-hosted app directly. Additionally, there is less room for error relating to port forwarding or reverse proxies; it is as close to “secure” as you can get while still being connected to the internet.


A NAS server surrounded by logos of alternative NAS operating systems, including TrueNAS, Unraid, and HexOS.


Why my WireGuard server is the most important thing in my homelab

A CloudFlare outage or a problem with your dynamic DNS service shouldn’t break your homelab.

If you want, you can run WireGuard directly on most consumer routers, which eliminates the need to pick up another device to self-host. Alternatively, you could host it on a Raspberry Pi of some kind. If you’re going to do a lot of big transfers, I’d recommend sticking to a Pi 4 or better, since the Pi Zero 2 W will be seriously limited by the speed of its wireless interface.

Syncthing keeps your devices mirrored without a server

It is peer-to-peer sync with no cloud in the middle

Syncthing is an open-source tool that syncs folders directly between your own devices. Unlike many other sync tools, it doesn’t require a central server; files move device-to-device over an encrypted connection, though you can use it with one. I use Syncthing to back up my working folders—like my Documents folder—directly to my main server and my laptop to ensure that nothing gets lost.

To use Syncthing, you need to install it on every device, but once you do that they should be able to automatically detect each other on your network. Once they’re detected, you just need to pair them and add the folders you want to sync. I’d recommend configuring it to always sync to your central server so that it always has a version of your files.

Duplicati creates an encrypted copy off-site before you lose your data

It is an automated encrypted backup for everything

Duplicati's backup interface on an iPad Pro sitting on a wooden background. Credit: 

Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

No DIY cloud storage solution is complete without a robust backup system. For that, I like Duplicati.

Duplicati is an open-source backup client that creates scheduled, incremental, and compressed backups. Crucially, it encrypts them before they ever leave your machine. You can send those copies to Backblaze, a friend’s NAS, or another backup solution that you own and control.

I’d recommend running Duplicati in Docker on the same server as your other apps and pointing it at the data folders for Nextcloud and any other services you may use, like Immich. Ideally, you should create an off-site backup of some kind, then set a strong encryption passphrase and store that passphrase somewhere safe and separate from the server. Mine is backed up on BitWarden and my own Vaultwarden instance.

After you’ve run a complete backup, test a restore to be sure it actually works. On more than one occasion, I’ve had a backup solution that looks good in theory but fails when I actually need it.


Self-hosting is cost-effective if you shop around

Building a full Dropbox replacement requires more than one app, but that is also part of the appeal. Once you start self-hosting your own file backup solution, you can basically layer on however many features you want.

Above and beyond the software, remember: you don’t need crazy hardware for a Dropbox replacement. Even a low-power CPU (like Intel’s N97 or AMD equivalent) can handle most of those jobs with ease. Considering that Dropbox costs $120 per year and the hardware for a 2TB backup solution (with full redundancy) might cost you $300-$400, it’ll pay for itself within a few years.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I am a recent convert to physical media — yet even as someone getting back into buying discs in 2026, I haven’t been buying Blu-rays. Like many Americans, I still pick up DVDs instead. These aren’t great times for the Blu-ray format, and don’t expect a turnaround in 2026.

Fewer new releases make their way to Blu-ray

More media is now released exclusively for streaming

Blu-ray has been around for two decades, but it never managed to fully replace, or even overtake, the DVD format it was designed to supersede. We still can’t take for granted that our favorite movies, let alone TV shows, will eventually see a Blu-ray release.

The movies most likely to come to Blu-ray are the ones that hit theaters, but a growing amount of cinema is designed exclusively with streaming platforms in mind. I recently rewatched Mississippi Masala, which led me to check in on what work Sarita Choudhury has done over the decades since. A film called Evil Eye released in 2020 caught my eye. Unfortunately, it’s only available via Prime Video. There’s no Blu-ray or even a DVD. In contrast, it’s easy to watch Michael B. Jordan in Sinners on Blu-ray, since that movie came to theaters last year.

You could say that it makes sense that a movie with a 4.8/10 rating on IMDb doesn’t see a physical release, but in the heyday of physical video, store shelves were stacked not only with just the big-budget bangers but plenty of straight-to-DVD movies as well. Now those films exist to pad out streaming catalogs instead.

Fewer big box stores stock their shelves with physical discs

Blu-ray discs have disappeared from some stores entirely

Best Buy store front
Best Buy

The format’s demise is striking. I frequent my local Best Buy quite often and don’t see any movies on display. That’s because the retailer stopped selling movies in stores several years ago. Walmart still sells them, but the selection is a fraction of what you could find ten or twenty years ago. The audience has been reduced down to the shrinking number of people whose internet at home can’t handle streaming and those who might think of themselves as collectors.

If you venture onto Reddit and visit r/Blu-ray, you will find more threads about thrift store hauls and older collections than excitement over the latest new release. Don’t get me wrong — I, too, am very excited about seeing what gems I can snag for only a couple bucks, but this shows the challenge retailers face. Increasingly, only enthusiasts are prepared to drop over $20 on a disc.

I’m not buying discs to stick them in a player

Phone on a stand playing a Netflix video Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

The simple truth is that most people don’t want to buy physical media. Discs don’t fit in phones, and the drives are no longer available in most laptops. Even desktop PCs lack a place to put a disk. I recently built a PC for the first time in part to digitize my media library, and I rely on an external DVD drive connected via USB. Yes, DVD, not Blu-ray. A smaller file size combined with upscaling is easier on my hard drive.

Retro nostalgia hasn’t helped Blu-ray in the same way it has aided vinyl. This is in part because most people simply don’t care all that much about video quality. Most are streaming video on Netflix and YouTube at middling settings on small screens, and many of us are acclimated to mid-range phone speakers, compared to which even the subpar built-in speakers on modern TVs sound like a huge step-up. It’s hard to convince large numbers of people to purchase an expensive version of a movie in a format that requires thousands of dollars of home media equipment to truly appreciate.

4K Ultra HD is in an even worse position

It’s been a decade, yet few people own these discs

The 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray format is an enhancement, rather than a replacement, of the Blu-ray discs that first appeared in 2006. Debuting in 2016, the 4K Ultra HD format supports the max resolution of a 4K TV.

4K TVs were still somewhat of a novelty ten years ago, but they’re cheap and commonplace today. Still, people aren’t demanding 4K-quality Blu-ray movies as a result. These discs are still less common than 1080p ones, which are themselves still outnumbered by DVDs.

This isn’t merely a matter of consumers preferring the cheaper option. Often, 4K simply isn’t a choice, or it’s one that arrives significantly later, like the Switch port of a PC title. Some recent films, like Exit 8, are slated to see a physical release over the summer yet will still be in 1080p when they do. Adoption of the newest format has been that slow.

The industry isn’t helping itself, either. 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray discs come with DRM and aren’t easy to play on a modern PC, further limiting potential growth. They do not want anyone pirating these super high-quality versions. When you consider that some of these 4K Blu-rays have an AI upscaling problem, you’re paying more for what may not even be the best version.​​​​​​​


Blu-ray is seeing fewer releases, is available in fewer places, and is less accessible in the ways many of us want to watch TV shows and movies in 2026. With our portable devices getting better and internet speeds getting faster, it’s hard to see physical video staging a turnaround, even if we’re still a long way off from it going away entirely.



Source link