Don’t expect smartwatches and fitness bands with replaceable batteries anytime soon


The EU has a habit of pushing tech companies to adopt meaningful changes in their product. It’s the reason your iPhone finally has a USB-C port, and it’s also why companies now have to offer spare parts and repair support for electronics for several years after launch. So naturally, many of us assumed wearables were next in line for mandatory swappable batteries. Turns out, the EU just went the other way.

So what did the EU announce?

On July 14, the European Commission adopted a new rule that adds more exemptions to its Batteries Regulation. Normally, portable batteries in products sold across the EU need to be removable and replaceable by the user. This helps devices last longer and makes recycling easier once they’re done.

Some products, like electric toothbrushes and other “wet appliances,” were already exempt for safety reasons. Now, the Commission is adding six more categories to that exempt list, and smartwatches and fitness bands are on it. Electric toys and equipment built for explosive environments, like explosion-proof sensors and pumps, also made the cut.

Why is the EU making an exception here?

This didn’t happen overnight. The Commission opened up applications back in 2025 and spent months consulting consumer groups, manufacturers, and EU member states before deciding which products deserved a pass. 

Safety played a role too, since poorly disposed small lithium-ion batteries have been causing more fires at waste facilities, and that risk had to be weighed before handing out exemptions.

The rule now heads to the European Parliament and the Council for review, and it becomes law 20 days after publication in the Official Journal, assuming nobody objects.

What this means for you

If your smartwatch or fitness tracker’s battery dies, don’t expect to pop it open yourself. You will likely still need to send it to an authorized repair shop. The EU’s repair revolution is real, but wearables just got left out of this particular fight.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link