CachyOS vs. MX Linux: Are you seeking speed or stability in your distro?


CachyOS vs Mx Linux

CachyOS and MX Linux

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • CachyOS and MX Linux are two distinctly different OSes.
  • Both have options for KDE Plasma, and each has a different base.
  • Both of these operating systems can be installed and used for free.

CachyOS and MX Linux are very popular at the moment. Even though they are both enjoying a surge in popularity, it’s important to know that they are different Linux distributions, even when you’re using the same desktop environment (which is exactly what I did).

The big question then becomes: Which one of these is the best option for you?

CachyOS

CachyOS

CachyOS offers a clean KDE Plasma look.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

CachyOS is an Arch-based distribution. 

That alone should tell you something about this open-source OS. But, don’t be scared away by its Arch-ness. Unlike Arch Linux, CachyOS does include two GUI app stores. Although one of the app stores might not be as modern as you might like, it’s still better than having to open the terminal app and run a command like:

sudo pacman -Sy libreoffice-fresh

Then there’s Shelly, which is a sort of anime-themed app store that allows you to add AUR, Flatpak, and AppImage support. Shelly also allows you to handle updates without having to leave the GUI. Even though Shelly is more modern than the other included app stores, it’s not quite on the level of KDE Discover or GNOME Software.

Also: I customized an Arch-based distro my way in under 5 minutes – and it’s glorious

Even the updates outside of Shelly are easier than running them through the terminal app (although they are actually done through the terminal). When you see the CachyOS update icon in the panel, click it, and a terminal app opens to run the updates for you. All you have to do is type “y” to proceed.

CachyOS

Updating CachyOS the terminal way.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

CachyOS is a rolling-release distribution (as is Arch), which means it’s more cutting-edge, so you’ll always enjoy the most recently released stable software and frequent updates.

CachyOS defaults to the KDE Plasma desktop environment, and the developers do a pretty good job of sticking with most of the defaults. The basic theme is fairly similar to that of stock KDE Plasma, down to the floating panel and dark theme.

One of the most impressive things about CachyOS is its speed. This distribution is one of the fastest I’ve ever used. No matter what I throw at CachyOS, it handles it without so much as a blink or blip. 

As far as preinstalled apps, CachyOS doesn’t ship with much. You get Firefox, the KDE Apps, a system snapshot app (to create restore points), a multimedia player, and a few utilities. If you want anything else, you’ll have to open one of the app stores.

Who is CachyOS for?

CachyOS is for those who want a rolling release Linux distribution that is faster than anything else they’ve used. The ideal CachyOS user also likes the idea that their operating system is based on Arch Linux. If you’ve ever wanted to give Arch Linux a try, CachyOS could serve as the ideal starting point. 

Also: How much RAM does your Linux PC actually need in 2026? An expert’s sweet spot

The best CachyOS user is also one who likes the look and feel of KDE Plasma.

If that sounds like you, give CachyOS a try.

MX Linux

MX Linux.

You can delete the files on the desktop and even disable Conky if you want a cleaner aesthetic.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

What CachyOS is to Arch Linux, MX Linux is to Debian.

As soon as you log into MX Linux for the first time, you’ll understand that, right on the desktop, are icons for an FAQ, the MX User Manual, and Quick System Info. You also get a nice Conky configuration that displays the time, date, and memory/CPU usage percentage.

I decided to compare apples to apples by downloading the KDE Plasma version of MX Linux. OK, maybe it’s more of a Granny Smith apples to Fuji apples comparison.

Either way, MX Linux offers a very nice KDE Plasma look and feel. It’s somewhat close to vanilla Plasma, but it’s clearly themed and banded for MX Linux.

MX Linux doesn’t offer the speed of CachyOS, but it makes up for that with user-friendliness, which is kind of the point of this distribution.

Also: Goodbye, VirtualBox – I found a better, more reliable VM manager for Linux

Outside of the Arch/Debian bases, one of the biggest differences between the two is the preinstalled applications. With MX Linux, you get everything you need… and more. There’s Firefox, LibreOffice, Thunderbird, QT Torrent, K3b, Strawberry, VLC media player, GIMP, all of the MX tools, and tons of utilities. You could install MX Linux and never have to install another piece of software again.

As I said, MX Linux is all about user-friendliness, so you get the KDE Discover app store, but it does not have Flathub support enabled by default. If you go to Discover > Settings, you’ll find integrations for both Flatpak and Snap available. Enable them both, and you’ll have a vast array of software to install.

MX Linux.

You don’t have to enable Flatpak or Snap, but I would recommend that you do because you’ll gain access to more apps.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Another difference between CachyOS and MX Linux is that, because MX Linux is based on Debian, the latter gives you more stability. That’s not to say CachyOS is unstable (it’s not), but Debian is one of the most stable OSes on the market, and MX Linux inherits it.

And then there’s the MX Tools, which offer a wide array of options, such as the MX Samba Config tool, which makes it easy to share folders across your network.

Who is CMX Linux for?

MX Linux is for those who want stability and a ton of pre-installed applications, all wrapped up with a nice bow of user-friendliness. Although MX Linux doesn’t hold your hand along the way, it gives you all the tools you need to feel comfortable using the Linux OS. 

So, if you’re new (or new-ish) to Linux, MX Linux is a great option.

Which is right for you?

This is simple: If you want one of the fastest operating systems that you’ve ever experienced, and you’re good with Arch Linux and installing the apps you need, CachyOS is the way to go. If you want user-friendliness and stability (with tons of pre-installed apps), MX Linux is what you want.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


When you pick out a phone, you’re also picking out the operating system—that typically means Android or iOS. What if a phone didn’t follow those rules? What if it could run any OS you wanted? This is the story of the legendary HTC HD2.

Microsoft makes a mess with Windows Mobile

The HD2 arrives at an unfortunate time

windows mobile 6.5 Credit: Pocketnow

Officially, the HTC HD2 (HTC Leo) launched in November 2009 with Windows Mobile 6.5. Microsoft had already been working on Windows Phone for a few years at this point, and it was planned to be released in 2009. However, multiple delays forced Microsoft to release Windows Mobile 6.5 as a stopgap update to Windows Mobile 6.1.

Microsoft’s plan for mobile devices was a mess at this time. The HD2 didn’t launch in North America until March 2010—one month after Windows Phone 7 had been announced at Mobile World Congress. Originally, the HD2 was supposed to be upgraded to Windows Phone 7, but Microsoft later decided no Windows Mobile devices would get the new OS.

This left the HD2 stuck between a rock and a hard place. Launched as the final curtain was dropping on one OS, but too early to be upgraded to the next OS. Thankfully, HTC was not just any manufacturer, and the HD2 was not just any phone.

The HD2 was better than it had any right to be

HTC made a beast of a phone

HTC HD2 Credit: HTC

HTC was one of the best smartphone manufacturers of the late 2000s and 2010s. It manufactured the first Android phone, the first Google Pixel phone, and several of the most iconic smartphones of the last two decades. Much of the company’s reputation for premium, high-quality hardware stems from the HD2.

The HD2 was the first smartphone with a 4.3-inch touchscreen—considered huge at the time—and one of the first smartphones with a 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. That processor, along with 512GB of RAM, made the HD2 more future-proof than HTC probably ever intended. Phones would be launching with those same specs for the next couple of years.

For all intents and purposes, the HD2 was the most powerful phone on the market. It just so happened to run the most limiting mobile OS of the time. If the software situation could be improved, there was clearly tons of potential.

The phone that could do it all

Android, Windows Phone, Ubuntu, and more

The key to the HD2’s hackability was HTC’s open design philosophy. It had an easily unlockable bootloader, and it could boot operating systems from the NAND flash and SD cards.

First, the community took to righting a wrong and bringing Windows Phone 7 to the HD2. This was thanks to a custom bootloader called “MAGLDR”—Windows Phone 7.5 and 8 would eventually get ported, too. The floodgates had opened, and Windows Phone was the least of what this beast of a phone could do.

Android on the HTC HD2? No problem. Name a version of the OS, and the HD2 had a port of it: 2.2 Froyo, 2.3 Gingerbread, 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, 4.1/2/3 Jelly Bean, 4.4 Kitkat, 5.0 Lollipop, 6.0 Marshmallow, 7.0 Nougat, and 8.1 Oreo. Yes, the HD2 was still getting ports seven years after it launched.

But why stop at Android? The HD2 was ripe for all sorts of Linux builds. Ubuntu—including Ubuntu Touch—, Debian, Firefox OS, and Nokia’s MeeGo were ported as well. The cool thing about the HD2 was that it could dual-boot OS’. You didn’t have to commit to just one system at a time. It was truly like having a PC in your pocket, and the tech community loved it.

Do a web search for “HTC HD2” now, and you’ll find many articles about the phone getting yet another port of an OS. It became a running joke that the HD2 would get new versions of Android before officially supported Android phones did. People called it “the phone that refuses to die,” but it was the community that kept it alive.

The last of its kind

“They don’t make ‘em like they used to”

HTC HD2 close up Credit: TechRepublic

The HTC HD2 was a phone from a very different time. It may have gotten more headlines, but there were plenty of other phones being heavily modded and unofficially upgraded back then. Unlockable bootloaders were much more common, and that created opportunities for enthusiasts.

I can attest to how different it was in the early years of the smartphone boom. My first smartphone was another HTC device, the DROID Eris from Verizon. I have fond memories of scouring the XDA-Developers forums for custom ROMs and installing the latest Kaos builds on a whim during college lectures. Sadly, it’s been many years since I attempted that level of customization.

It’s not all doom and gloom for modern smartphones, though. Long-term support has gotten considerably better than it was back in 2010. As mentioned, the HD2 never officially received Windows Phone 7, and it never got any other updates, either. My DROID Eris stopped getting updates a mere eight months after release.

Compare that to phones such as the Samsung Galaxy S26, Google Pixel 10, and iPhone 17, which will all be supported through 2032. You may not be able to dual-boot a completely different OS on these phones, but they won’t be dead in the water in less than a year. We will likely never see a phone like the HTC HD2 from a major manufacturer again.

HTC Droid Eris


A Love Letter to My First Smartphone, the HTC Droid Eris

No, not that DROID.



Source link