Australia unveils a 2.25% levy on Meta, Google, and TikTok


The News Bargaining Incentive applies from 1 July 2026. Platforms that deal with news organisations get full or partial offsets against the levy. The legislation explicitly excludes pure AI chatbot services from coverage. Communications Minister Anika Wells and PM Albanese both announced the draft on Tuesday.


The Australian government released draft legislation on Tuesday for a “News Bargaining Incentive”, a 2.25% levy on the Australian revenues of Meta, Google, and TikTok that will apply unless those platforms strike deals to pay local news publishers for the journalism that appears on their platforms. Communications Minister Anika Wells and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese presented the proposal at a press conference in Canberra.

The levy is intended to apply from the 2025–26 financial year, which starts on 1 July 2026. Meta, Google, and TikTok did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The mechanism is structured as a market incentive rather than a mandate.

Platforms that negotiate and sign deals with Australian news publishers will receive offsets against the levy, with larger offsets available for deals struck with smaller, regional news organisations. If a platform does no deals, the full 2.25% levy on its Australian revenue is payable, with proceeds directed back to news publishers based on their journalist headcounts.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Wells framed it explicitly as a carrot-and-stick arrangement: “Platforms should do deals with news organisations. If they decide not to, they will end up paying more.” Albanese added: “What we’re encouraging is for organisations to sit down with news organisations, get these deals done, and then we can move forward.”

The levy base is defined as the platform’s consolidated revenue “attributable to Australia,” calculated from their financial statements from three years earlier, a backward-looking assessment designed to prevent gaming through revenue reallocation.

The specificity of the calculation base is significant: Australian revenues for global platforms like Meta and Google are not always publicly disclosed at a granular level, and the definition of what is “attributable to Australia” for advertising revenue earned in a global auction will likely be contested during legislative passage. Australia has not disclosed an estimate of what the levy would generate if the major platforms refused to deal.

The proposal explicitly replaces the 2021 News Media Bargaining Code, the Morrison-era law that required platforms to negotiate in good faith with publishers or face mandatory arbitration. The government’s assessment is that those rules are “no longer working effectively.”

The original code had a complicated history. After it was passed, Meta temporarily blocked Australian users from sharing news articles on Facebook in a high-profile standoff that generated global attention. It subsequently struck deals with several Australian media firms, as did Google. Those deals expired in 2024, and with the platforms having chosen not to renew them, the government concluded the voluntary negotiation framework had run its course.

The draft bill explicitly excludes “artificial intelligence services that solely use large language models to provide answers to questions or other information.” That carve-out is designed to prevent the levy from applying to AI chatbots like Gemini, Meta AI, or ChatGPT when they are accessed directly as question-answering services.

The distinction between a search engine or social media feed that uses journalism as ambient engagement content, and an AI assistant that provides direct answers without directing users to publisher websites, reflects the government’s attempt to draw the line at the platforms that extract commercial value from news distribution rather than those that have simply stopped distributing news altogether.

Whether that distinction is legally durable as the categories blur, as AI-powered search increasingly replaces traditional link-based results, is a question the legislation will face over time.

The international context is relevant. Canada passed its Online News Act in 2023 under a similar rationale; Meta responded by blocking news sharing on Facebook and Instagram for Canadian users before ultimately returning to a limited deal arrangement. The EU’s Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive established neighbouring rights for press publishers in 2019 that have been the subject of ongoing disputes with Google across multiple member states.

Australia’s News Bargaining Incentive is the most explicit version yet of the “negotiate or pay” framework, with a defined percentage rate rather than an open-ended arbitration mechanism. The 2.25% rate applies to revenue across the covered platforms, not specifically to advertising revenue or news-adjacent revenue, which makes it a broader tax instrument than the approaches taken in Europe.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Remember those moments when a tech giant throws a curveball, only for the underdog to dodge it with style? That’s exactly what just went down with Anything. For those of you unaware, it’s an AI-powered app builder that lets users whip up mobile and web apps using simple text prompts.

Last week, Apple yanked the app from the App Store, citing its usual guideline around code execution and keeping apps “self-contained.” The move felt like part of a broader side-eye toward so-called “vibe coding” tools, where building software is starting to feel as casual as texting a friend.

Apple pulled the app… and Anything got creative

Instead of backing down, the Anything team went full chaos mode, and in a good way. They rebuilt the core experience inside iMessage, effectively turning a messaging app into an app-building tool. Yes, actual app creation… through texts.

BREAKING: Apple is scared of vibe coding

they removed Anything from the App Store so we moved app building to iMessage

good luck removing this one, Apple pic.twitter.com/QrZ2oRk6ha

— Anything (@anything) April 2, 2026

It didn’t just work, it blew up. The workaround went viral, people loved the ingenuity, and the narrative flipped almost instantly. What started as “Apple said no” quickly turned into “wait, this is actually genius.” Memes followed, timelines filled up, and suddenly it felt like Apple had been outplayed at its own game.

And now, just like that, it’s back

Just days later, Apple quietly brought Anything back to the App Store with a few tweaks, but the core idea remains the same: build apps using simple text prompts, preview them instantly, and ship them straight from a phone. The comeback also feels like a subtle shift in momentum. AI is making creation faster, easier, and way more accessible. And when developers can route around restrictions using something as basic as iMessage, it becomes harder to hold that line.

As AI makes creation effortless, even tightly controlled platforms are being forced to adapt. And if this saga proves anything, it’s that creativity will always find a way around the rules.



Source link