Asus Pad comes out as a brazen iPad wannabe, but looks like a solid OLED Android slate


ASUS has officially unveiled the new Asus Pad, and honestly, the inspiration is impossible to ignore. From the flat metal chassis and symmetrical bezels to the magnetic keyboard accessories and stylus support, the tablet looks heavily influenced by Apple’s iPad lineup. But underneath the familiar design language sits what could actually be one of the more compelling Android tablets launched this year.

The Asus Pad arrives at a time when Android tablet makers are aggressively trying to close the gap with Apple in premium productivity-focused hardware. While many Android tablets still struggle with app optimization and ecosystem polish, companies increasingly realize that buyers care just as much about display quality, battery life, and hardware design as they do about software exclusives.

And on paper, the Asus Pad checks several important boxes.

An OLED Android tablet focused on entertainment and productivity

The biggest highlight of the Asus Pad is its OLED display. ASUS has equipped the tablet with a high-refresh-rate OLED panel designed to compete directly against premium tablets focused on media consumption, creative work, and productivity.

The company says the tablet supports HDR content, wide colour gamut coverage, and enhanced contrast performance typically associated with OLED technology. Combined with quad-speaker audio and slim bezels, ASUS is clearly positioning the device as both an entertainment machine and a lightweight work companion.

Internally, the Asus Pad uses Qualcomm Snapdragon hardware paired with AI-focused software features integrated across the operating system. ASUS is also heavily emphasizing stylus functionality, multitasking support, and keyboard accessories designed to make the device function more like a laptop replacement.

The design itself feels deliberately premium. The aluminum construction, flat edges, rounded corners, and accessory ecosystem immediately invite comparisons to Apple’s iPad Air and iPad Pro lineup. Even the naming strategy – simply calling it “Asus Pad” – feels unusually direct.

Still, there are meaningful differences. ASUS appears more focused on flexibility and open Android workflows rather than locking users into a tightly controlled ecosystem. The tablet also supports broader file management and sideloading capabilities that some users still prefer over Apple’s more restrictive approach.

Why this tablet actually matters

Android tablets have long suffered from an identity problem. Many devices either target budget buyers or attempt to mimic iPads without offering enough refinement to truly compete. The Asus Pad, however, feels more intentional. Instead of trying to radically reinvent the category, ASUS appears focused on delivering premium hardware at what will likely be a more competitive price than Apple’s OLED iPads.

That matters because OLED tablets are still relatively rare outside the ultra-premium segment. If ASUS prices the device aggressively, it could appeal to users who want high-end display quality for streaming, gaming, creative work, and multitasking without entering iPad Pro pricing territory.

Of course, software optimization will still be the biggest challenge. Apple’s advantage in tablet apps, ecosystem integration, and long-term software support remains difficult to match.

But the broader tablet market is changing quickly. Android manufacturers increasingly understand that people no longer just want cheap tablets. They want premium tablets that happen to run Android.

And despite the very obvious iPad energy here, the Asus Pad might actually deliver exactly that.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


“It was severely downgraded,” Gilbert confirms. “I never would have found it if I was just looking through Google results.” (I tried the same prompt in Gemini earlier this month, and after an initial denial, the tool also gave me Eiger’s number.)

After this experience, Eiger, Gilbert, and another UW PhD student, Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, decided to test ChatGPT to see what it would surface about a professor. 

At first, OpenAI’s guardrails kicked in, and ChatGPT responded that the information was unavailable. But in the same response, the chatbot suggested, “if you want to go deeper, I can still try a more ‘investigative-style’ approach.” Their inquiry just had to help “narrow things down,” ChatGPT said, by providing “a neighborhood guess” for where the professor might live, or “a possible co-owner name” for the professor’s home. ChatGPT continued: “That’s usually the only way to surface newer or intentionally less-visible property records.” 

The students provided this information, leading ChatGPT to produce the professor’s home address, home purchase price, and spouse’s name from city property records. 

(Taya Christianson, an OpenAI representative, said she was not able to comment on what happened in this case without seeing screenshots or knowing which model the students had tested, even after we pointed out that many users may not know which model they were using in the ChatGPT interface. She also declined to comment generally about the exposure of PII by the chatbot, instead providing links to documents describing how OpenAI handles privacy, including filtering out PII, and other tools.) 

This reveals one of the fundamental problems with chatbots, says DeleteMe’s Shavell. AI companies “can build in guardrails, but [their chatbots] are also designed to be effective and to answer customer questions.”

The exposure issue is not limited to Gemini or ChatGPT. Last year, Futurism found that if you prompted xAI’s chatbot Grok with “[name] address,” in almost all cases, it provided not only residential addresses but also often the person’s phone numbers, work addresses, and addresses for people with similar-sounding names. (xAI did not respond to a request for comment.) 

No clear answers

There aren’t straightforward solutions to this problem—there’s no easy way to either verify whether someone’s personal information is in a given model’s training set or to compel the models to remove PII. 



Source link