Apple Maps is getting ads, and it just lost the one thing that made it worth using


Ads already appear in some Apple apps, including the App Store, Apple News, and some live sports on Apple TV. Now there’s a new app to add to the list, as Apple has confirmed that ads will soon be coming to the Apple Maps app, too.

Ads are coming to Apple Maps

Siri showcasing weather information while getting turn-by-turn directions in Maps in CarPlay. Credit: Nathaniel Pangaro / How-To Geek | Apple

Apple has confirmed that ads will soon be coming to Apple Maps. Starting in summer 2026 in the US and Canada, ads will appear in the Maps app when people use the search feature. Promoted businesses may appear in these results and may also appear in a new Suggested Places feature that will include recommendations for nearby businesses.

Apple has stated that it will maintain user privacy by ensuring that all personal data stays on the users’ devices and won’t be shared with Apple or any third parties. Your location won’t be disclosed to any businesses, and none of the ads you interact with will be linked to your Apple Account.

Being ad-free was the best Apple Maps feature

It’s lost its main advantage over Google Maps

Google Maps open on an iPhone showing a destination. Credit: Jason Montoya / How-To Geek

​​​​​​​

Apple Maps has gotten a lot better over the years, although for some people, it’s never really managed to shift its reputation as a poor imitation of Google Maps. For many iPhone users, Google Maps is still their navigation app of choice.

For a long time, Apple Maps has had one key benefit that Google Maps couldn’t match, and that’s the lack of ads. Google Maps didn’t start out with ads when it launched in 2005, but eventually, Google started allowing businesses to pay for a better position in the search results. In 2016, Google introduced Promoted Pins, which let companies pay to show their logos on the map interface instead of the standard pin icon.

Ads in Google Maps have become ever more targeted. You can now see personalized suggestions based on your journey history, or promotions for businesses that are located along your current journey. All of these ads require accessing a lot of your data, such as your journey history and location history, which isn’t great for privacy.

Until now, as an iPhone user who wanted to maintain privacy, you could always use Apple Maps instead. The app may not have been as good as Google Maps in the early days, but at least it was ad-free.

Apple Maps wasn’t great when it launched, but it’s improved a lot, and currently, it’s a perfectly adequate replacement for Google Maps if you don’t want to be bombarded with ads. Unfortunately, Apple Maps is about to lose one of the best things that it had going for it and add Google Maps’ worst feature of all.

Apple’s focus on ads is not a good sign

Hardware may not be making enough money

An outdoor Apple logo sign surrounded by trees. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

The fact that Apple will be including ads in Apple Maps is not a good sign. 10 years ago, hardware was the biggest driver of Apple’s profits, with services making up only a relatively small fraction of revenue. That share has consistently grown, while the share of revenue from hardware has fallen.

It’s possible that the high margins from Apple’s current services aren’t enough to make up the shortfall from the drop in hardware revenue, particularly with the increasing costs of components such as memory. Unable to rely on hardware sales like it used to, it may be that Apple is being forced to try to wring even more money out of services.

If this is the case, it isn’t a great sign for Apple. Introducing ads to services isn’t something consumers are likely to be enormously happy about, so for Apple to make this move would seem to indicate that things aren’t going as well as they could on the hardware side. It may be that Apple will be forced to look for further ways to gain revenue, and ads may find their way into other parts of the Apple ecosystem.

It’s not just Apple that’s doing this

Ads are appearing in paid services

Apple is far from the only company that’s turning to ads to increase revenue. There are plenty of other companies that are resorting to the same tactic, to the detriment of their users. The trend isn’t limited to navigation apps.

Streaming services are one example. In some cases, even when you pay for a subscription, such as with Amazon Prime or HBO Max, you’ll still see ads in the standard tiers. If you want a truly ad-free experience, you have to pay an additional premium on top of your standard subscription price.

This type of enshittification is a sad fact of life. As companies strive to make more money, it’s the user who ends up suffering. It’s reaching the point where we’re now paying companies for the privilege of being shown ads. Once again, one of the major benefits of streaming is being eroded, and streaming is becoming more and more like the cable TV it was supposed to replace.

The Prime Video logo.

Subscription with ads

Yes, via Prime membership or $9/month

Simultaneous streams

3

Prime Video has a large volume of content to watch. The other Amazon perks are a bonus as well.



Ads are becoming a fact of life

Ads are an easy way for companies to generate extra revenue from their services. The margins are huge, and the only downside is that the end user gets a much worse experience. Sadly, it seems that’s become less and less of a consideration for many companies.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link