After wearing Sennheiser’s Momentum 5, I’ll never doubt the company’s competitive edge again


mom5-4.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Detailed sound
  • Marathon battery life
  • Comfortable fit
Cons

  • BT 6.0 not ready at launch
  • ANC still weaker than Sony and Bose

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Sennheiser has been refining its flagship Momentum headphones for nearly 15 years, receiving acclaim for its minimalist design, marathon battery life, and clear, natural sound profile. The company’s Momentum 4 from 2022 received similar praise, but competition in the noise-cancellation category was much stronger than it had been years before, posing a major pitfall for Sennheiser’s headphones.

Also: I tested Sony’s new premium headphones, and they define practical luxury for me

However, Sennheiser returns with the fifth installment of its flagship headphones, and the Momentum 5 comes at the right time, with the right generational fine-tuning to compete. The Momentum 5 retains the line’s hallmark minimal, sleek design, 42mm transducer, and long-lasting playtime while introducing Dolby Atmos support, enhanced noise cancellation, and audio personalization features. 

Best headphone deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

How do they sound?

Sennheiser’s strength has long been in delivering high-fidelity sound at a competitive price in its consumer headphones. This strength remains true in the Momentum 5. Their soundstage is wider than that of competitors from Sony, Apple, and Bose, with noticeable instrument and vocal separation, bright highs, and accurate mid-low to low frequencies. 

Like all consumer headphones, Sennheiser places a slight emphasis on bass, but not as much as Bose, which can get a little muddy at loud volume. Sennheiser’s low frequencies are punchy and tight, while mid-low frequencies deliver that nice rumble you can feel deep in your ear. The Momentum 5’s high-frequency reproduction isn’t as shiny as Sony’s, but it’s sharper and more precise, helping avoid listening fatigue. 

The head-shaking bass in trap bangers like Future’s “March Madness” doesn’t overpower the rapper’s vocals and ad-libs. On the other hand, the glistening piano melody in “The Way It Is,” Bruce Hornsby & The Range’s contemporary rock ballad, has minimal harshness and a touch of sparkle.

Also: I connected a Bluetooth Auracast receiver to my TV, and it’s a worthwhile home audio upgrade

If you prefer boomier bass, you’ll need to make some touch-ups in the companion app’s EQ. I turned the Bass Boost setting on because the Momentum 5’s sound is on the neutral side. Overall, I think those who appreciate a less “consumer” sound will appreciate the Momentum 5’s sound, as few sonic details go unnoticed.

The Momentum 5 supports wired listening via USB-C and 3.5mm jack, and a host of AptX codecs for higher-quality wireless audio, including AptX Adaptive, HD, and Lossless.

Let’s talk audio features

The Momentum 5 debuts with Dolby Atmos support in a similar fashion to the Sonos Ace. If you have a subscription to a music streaming service that supports Atmos formats, it will technically work with any headphones, as the audio encoding occurs on your source device. 

It seems that Sennheiser licensed Atmos for headphones to create a Dolby-approved virtual 3D upmixer for stereo content, rather than using an in-house-made one, as JBL and Bose do.

Sennheiser Momentum 5 in Denim

Jada Jones/ZDNET

So, I assume that Sennheiser’s Dolby Atmos licensing means users can virtually upmix any content they listen to and access head-tracking. According to Sennheiser, head-tracking is wrapped in a “day one update,” and I received these headphones ahead of their release, so I wasn’t able to test it.

Also: How Sony nearly ruled spatial audio – until Apple changed music forever

Dolby Atmos is already tricky to get right in headphones, though I believe the head-tracking feature would make an obvious difference. Sennheiser also teases consumers with a future Bluetooth 6.0 firmware update, potentially for improved device tracking and LE Audio activation, though it’s unclear when this update will arrive. I would have liked to see these features at launch.

Better noise cancellation than before

Sennheiser made long-legged strides in improving its headphones’ noise-canceling abilities, partly by beefing up the number of noise-processing microphones. The Momentum 5 features four microphones per ear cup, compared to the Momentum 4’s two.

The Momentum 5’s noise cancellation is considerably stronger than the previous generation, with improved reduction of mid- and low-frequency noise. Additionally, Sennheiser’s transparency mode is much more natural than the Momentum 4.

I really appreciate that you can adjust the Momentum 5’s noise reduction levels on a sliding scale rather than in preset modes. This level of customization makes it easier to filter environmental noise to your liking. There’s still a capable adaptive ANC mode if you’d prefer the headphones to filter noise based on your environment.

Sennheiser Momentum 5 in Denim

Jada Jones/ZDNET

I wore the Momentum 5 to the gym and a busy grocery store on a Saturday afternoon. They did a great job in the moderately busy gym, but struggled more in the lively store. These headphones aren’t as strong at canceling noise as Sony or Bose, but they’re on par with Sonos, which is still good. 

Sennheiser is a strong leader in battery endurance, as the Momentum 4 boasts 60 hours of playtime. The Momentum 5 shaves 3 hours off, promising 57 hours of playtime with ANC on, which is still impressive. I’m not upset about this small decrease; even with 57 hours, Sennheiser promises 27 more hours than Sony’s WH-1000XM6, 37 more than Apple’s AirPods Max 2, and 27 more than Bose’s QuietComfort Ultra 2.

I believe Sennheiser’s improved noise-reduction algorithm and upgraded digital signal processor are to blame for the difference in battery life. However, it means they’re consuming more power to accommodate more advanced systems.

App support & design

The Sennheiser Smart Control Plus app is a solid companion app: simple, clean, and useful. Here, you can adjust noise reduction levels and audio modes, tweak an upgraded eight-band equalizer, see where your headphones last connected to your device, and create sound zones, similar to Sony’s Adaptive Sound Control.

Sennheiser didn’t stray far from the Momentum 4’s design; the Momentum 5 has clean lines and a nondescript look. Aside from a few more metallic accents here and there, the Momentum 5 looks nearly identical to the previous generation.

Also: Sony WH-1000XM6 vs. Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2: How I’d justify spending $300 more for headphones

Sennheiser prefers touch controls on the right ear cup rather than multifunction buttons, and though the company’s implementation is simple to understand and reliable, they are very sensitive. Sometimes, my hair or a small adjustment of the ear cup would trigger an accidental response, so I opt to turn the touch controls off and use my phone instead.

On the comfort front, the Momentum 5 has supple earpads with sufficient cushion, and they were more than comfortable for me to wear for hours. Sennheiser’s flagship headphones have a more relaxed clamping force than its midrange Accentum line. However, the earcups are on the small side, so if you have a larger head or ears, you might have an issue.

ZDNET’s buying advice

The Sennheiser Momentum 5 debuts with several meaningful upgrades, including improved audio processing that delivers better sound and noise cancellation, as well as minor design changes that help it stand up to industry heavyweights. 

The Momentum 5’s competitive $400 price makes them cheaper than Sony’s and Bose’s flagship headphones, though I think a $50-$60 difference accurately reflects the differences in noise-canceling performance. However, if you want to exchange smarter features and stronger noise cancellation for a refined sound profile, Sennheiser’s got a solid choice that’ll surely make a splash this summer.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link