A grand jury is trying to force Reddit to unmask a user who criticised ICE


On the evening of 7 January 2026, ICE officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old woman, in Minneapolis. Within days, Ross was named publicly: The Intercept identified him and published biographical details, and other news organisations followed. Across Reddit, users discussed the shooting, the officer, and the agency. One of them is now the target of a federal grand jury investigation.

According to a subpoena obtained by The Intercept, federal prosecutors in Washington, DC have ordered Reddit to appear before a grand jury and hand over the name, address, phone number, and other personal data of a user who posted criticisms of Ross and shared biographical information about him, details that had already appeared in published news articles. Reddit has until 14 April to comply.

This is the second attempt by the government to unmask the same user. In early March, ICE issued an administrative summons to Reddit citing a provision of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, a near-century-old statute governing customs duties, wild animal imports, forfeited wines and spirits, and cross-border trade in goods. The user filed a sworn declaration stating they had nothing to do with the imports and exports the statute was designed to regulate. A Northern California federal court agreed, and the government withdrew the summons around 27 March.

Four days later, it came back. The new demand arrived not from an ICE field agent but from a Special Assistant US Attorney in Washington, DC, where the US Attorney’s office is led by Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host and judge who was confirmed to the role by the Senate in a 50-to-45 vote in August 2025. The new subpoena moved the proceedings to a different jurisdiction, expanded the scope of the data requested, and carried an instruction telling Reddit not to disclose that the subpoena existed.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Grand jury proceedings are, by design, secret and not adversarial. Unlike a civil court challenge, where the target of an information demand can argue the merits before a neutral judge, a grand jury offers no equivalent forum. Matthew Kellegrew, an attorney at the Civil Liberties Defense Center representing the user, described the escalation as “a disturbing” one, arguing that the First Amendment raised the bar considerably for any government investigation that “intrudes into the area of constitutionally protected rights of speech, press, association.” Will Creeley, the legal director at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, was blunter: “So far, the government hasn’t been able to point to a single Reddit post that’s not protected by the First Amendment.”

Reddit reportedly notified the affected user after the subpoena was obtained by the user’s lawyers. The company has a documented history of contesting government data demands, but its own transparency report tells a more complicated story. The first half of 2025, which Reddit described as the highest volume of requests it had received in any single reporting period, included 1,179 requests from law enforcement agencies worldwide. Sixty-six per cent came from US agencies. Reddit disclosed user data in 82 per cent of cases.

The grand jury subpoena is the sharpest expression yet of a much broader campaign. The Department of Homeland Security has sent hundreds of administrative subpoenas to Google, Meta, Reddit, and Discord in recent months, seeking the identities of users who have documented ICE activity, criticised government immigration policy, or attended protests. Gizmodo reported that Reddit, Meta, and Google voluntarily complied with some of those requests. The Electronic Frontier Foundation published an open letter to major technology companies in February 2026 urging them to resist what it characterised as lawless DHS subpoenas, warning that the tool, which requires no judicial approval, had been repurposed from its original use in cases such as child abductions and was now being deployed against political speech.

What the Reddit user posted was not private intelligence. It was a summary of publicly available information about an ICE officer whose actions had generated national news coverage, a job title, a hometown, and biographical details already in print. The government has not explained publicly what crime it believes was committed. In the context of a secret grand jury, that silence is, in a sense, the whole mechanism.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link