Samsung may finally kill the Galaxy Ultra’s most criticised camera lens


Samsung may finally be preparing a major shake-up for its flagship Galaxy S lineup. According to new leaks, the company is reportedly testing a new Galaxy S27 Pro model that could sit between the standard Galaxy S27 and the Galaxy S27 Ultra. More interestingly, the phone may end up offering a surprisingly different camera experience from the Ultra itself.

The biggest change revolves around Samsung’s telephoto camera strategy – an area where Galaxy Ultra phones have faced criticism for years.

Samsung could finally kill its most criticised camera lens

According to the latest rumours, both the Galaxy S27 Pro and Galaxy S27 Ultra are expected to share the same 200MP primary camera and ultrawide sensor. The major difference would come from the zoom camera setup. The Galaxy S27 Pro is tipped to feature a new 50MP ALoP telephoto sensor with 3.5x optical zoom, while the Galaxy S27 Ultra may use a separate 50MP telephoto camera with 5x optical zoom.

More importantly, Samsung is reportedly planning to remove the long-criticised 3x telephoto lens from the Ultra model entirely. That lens has been one of the weaker points of recent Galaxy Ultra phones, often delivering inconsistent image quality compared to Samsung’s stronger 5x zoom hardware and high-resolution main camera.

If the rumours are accurate, Samsung could instead rely more heavily on sensor cropping from its 200MP primary camera for intermediate zoom levels. That may simplify the camera system while improving overall image consistency.

Ironically, the Galaxy S27 Pro’s 3.5x optical zoom setup could potentially offer a more balanced and practical photography experience for many users. Mid-range zoom levels are often more useful for portraits, food photography, pets, and everyday shooting than extreme long-range zoom.

Samsung may finally be fixing its “Middle Child” problem

The leak also suggests Samsung is rethinking the structure of its flagship lineup itself. For years, the Galaxy S Ultra models have received nearly all of Samsung’s premium hardware, while the standard and Plus models often felt like compromised alternatives with fewer standout features. That left many buyers stuck between choosing a compact phone or getting the fully featured Ultra. The Galaxy S27 Pro may finally address that gap.

Reports suggest Samsung wants the Pro model to act as a true premium flagship rather than a slightly upgraded Plus variant. The main compromise compared to the Ultra could simply be the absence of the S Pen and some differences in zoom range.

That strategy mirrors what companies like Apple have done with the iPhone Pro lineup, where users can choose between two premium flagships rather than one clearly superior option.

Why this matters

If Samsung follows through with these changes, the Galaxy S27 series could become one of the company’s biggest flagship redesigns in years. The removal of the 3x telephoto camera alone would address one of the longest-running complaints surrounding Galaxy Ultra cameras. Meanwhile, a more premium Galaxy S27 Pro could finally give users a flagship Samsung phone without forcing them into the massive Ultra form factor.

At the same time, it is important to remember these are still early leaks. Samsung is reportedly testing multiple prototypes internally, meaning specifications and camera setups could still change before launch. Samsung is expected to unveil the Galaxy S27 lineup in early 2027. Until then, more leaks surrounding the camera hardware, chipset, battery upgrades, and final product naming are likely to emerge over the coming months.

For now, though, the Galaxy S27 Pro is already shaping up to be one of Samsung’s most interesting flagship experiments in years – and possibly the phone that finally fixes the company’s awkward middle-ground problem.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link