JPMorgan files second tokenized money market fund on Ethereum as Wall Street’s blockchain race accelerates



TL;DR

JPMorgan filed for its second tokenized money market fund on Ethereum, accelerating Wall Street’s race to build regulated financial products on blockchain infrastructure now that the Genius Act has removed the regulatory ambiguity that kept institutions on the sidelines.

 

JPMorgan Chase filed paperwork on Tuesday for its second tokenized money market fund, four months after becoming the largest global systemically important bank to put a fund on the Ethereum blockchain. The JPMorgan OnChain Liquidity-Token Money Market Fund, ticker JLTXX, will issue digital tokens on Ethereum representing shares in a portfolio of US Treasuries and overnight repurchase agreements. The tokens can be held in digital wallets, transferred between investors, or posted as collateral in crypto markets, with transactions settling in minutes rather than the one to two days that conventional fund shares require.

The filing is unremarkable by the standards of traditional asset management. It is a money market fund. It buys Treasuries. It pays a yield. What makes it significant is where it lives. The fund exists on a public blockchain, governed by smart contracts, accessible to investors who hold digital wallets, and designed to comply with the Genius Act, the federal stablecoin framework that President Trump signed into law in July 2025. The largest bank in the United States is building regulated financial products on the same infrastructure that the crypto industry spent a decade telling Wall Street would replace it.

The first fund

JPMorgan’s asset management arm launched My OnChain Net Yield Fund, known as MONY, on the Ethereum blockchain in December 2025. The fund invests in US Treasuries and repurchase agreements fully collateralised by Treasuries, with a one million dollar minimum investment for qualified investors. JPMorgan seeded it with 100 million dollars. MONY is powered by Kinexys Digital Assets, the bank’s proprietary tokenization platform that has processed more than 300 billion dollars in intraday repurchase transactions since its inception.

The second fund, JLTXX, extends the strategy. Where MONY was a private placement under SEC Rule 506(c), restricted to qualified investors, JLTXX appears to be structured for broader distribution through a 485BPOS filing, the amendment form used for existing registered investment companies. The underlying assets are the same: Treasuries and overnight repos collateralised by Treasuries. The innovation is not in what the fund holds. It is in how the fund’s shares move.

A conventional money market fund share settles through a transfer agent, a custodian, and a clearing house, a process that takes a business day or two and involves multiple intermediaries. A tokenized share settles on-chain in minutes. The investor holds the token directly in a wallet. The token can be transferred peer-to-peer. It can be posted as collateral in decentralised finance protocols or used in crypto-native trading venues without converting to cash first. The underlying Treasuries remain with a traditional custodian. The ownership layer moves to the blockchain. The plumbing changes. The asset does not.

The race

JPMorgan is not alone. BlackRock filed paperwork last week for two tokenized money market funds targeting investors holding cash in stablecoins. The first, the BlackRock Daily Reinvestment Stablecoin Reserve Vehicle, would invest in cash, short-dated Treasuries, and overnight repos. The second would tokenize a share class of an existing 6.1 billion dollar money market fund on Ethereum. BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, its first tokenized product, launched in March 2024 and now manages more than 2.5 billion dollars across eight chains including Ethereum, Solana, and Aptos.

The market value of tokenized assets has surged more than 400 per cent since the start of 2025 to roughly 32 billion dollars, according to rwa.xyz. The figure is small relative to the trillions held in mutual funds and ETFs. But the growth rate is not small, and the participants are not startups. JPMorgan, BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and Goldman Sachs are all launching or testing tokenized fund products. The institutions that spent years dismissing blockchain as a solution in search of a problem are now racing to build products on it.

Haun Ventures raised one billion dollars in May for two funds targeting stablecoin infrastructure and AI agent plumbing, a bet that the financial rails crypto built will become the financial rails AI agents use. Katie Haun’s thesis is that AI agents will need regulated financial infrastructure to transact autonomously, and that the firms which built stablecoin plumbing are best positioned to build it. JPMorgan’s tokenized funds are the institutional version of the same thesis: traditional assets, distributed on crypto infrastructure, designed for a world in which capital moves at the speed of software.

The law

The Genius Act, signed in July 2025, created the first federal regulatory framework for dollar-linked stablecoins. It requires stablecoin issuers to be licensed, hold one-to-one reserves in dollars or low-risk assets such as Treasury bills, and comply with anti-money-laundering and sanctions requirements. The law also preserves the ability of banks to issue tokenized deposits that pay interest, and explicitly states that permitted stablecoins are not securities.

The regulatory clarity is the reason the race accelerated. Before the Genius Act, tokenized fund products occupied a grey area. Issuers faced uncertain enforcement from the SEC, unclear classification of digital tokens, and the risk that a future administration would reverse any guidance. The law removed the ambiguity. Stablecoin reserves must be held in Treasuries, repos, or cash. Tokenized fund shares that invest in the same instruments sit naturally alongside the stablecoin framework. JPMorgan and BlackRock are not building on the blockchain because they believe in decentralisation. They are building on it because Congress told them the rules.

Regulation has historically been the catalyst that unlocks institutional adoption in technology markets. Europe’s regulatory frameworks have driven investment into sectors from cleantech to cybersecurity by reducing the uncertainty that keeps large institutions on the sidelines. The Genius Act is doing the same for tokenized finance in the United States. The law did not invent tokenization. It made tokenization investable.

The strategy

Jamie Dimon told shareholders in his April 2026 annual letter that JPMorgan must move faster on blockchain because “a whole new set of competitors is emerging based on blockchain, which includes stablecoins, smart contracts and other forms of tokenization.” He added: “We need to roll out our own blockchain technology and continually focus on what our customers want.” The man who once called Bitcoin a fraud is now warning his shareholders that blockchain competitors pose a strategic threat to the bank.

Dimon’s concern is not philosophical. Stablecoin transaction volumes surpassed the combined on-chain settlement volumes of Visa and Mastercard in 2025. Stripe acquired the stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge for 1.1 billion dollars. Mastercard acquired BVNK for 1.8 billion dollars. The payments infrastructure that the crypto industry built during the speculative phases of the market is now being absorbed by the financial institutions that initially rejected it.

Fintechs building stablecoin payments products are already reaching billion-dollar valuations, serving verticals from e-commerce to healthcare suppliers with treasury tools that operate natively on blockchain rails. JPMorgan’s tokenized funds are the bank’s answer: offering the same speed and programmability, but with the balance sheet, regulatory licence, and brand of the largest bank in America behind them.

The gap

Tokenized assets at 32 billion dollars represent a rounding error in a global fund industry measured in the tens of trillions. The gap between the current market and the projections is enormous. Boston Consulting Group and Ripple project the tokenized asset market could reach 18.9 trillion dollars by 2033. That projection requires tokenization to move from a novelty to a default, from a handful of money market funds to bonds, equities, private credit, real estate, and every other asset class that currently settles through legacy infrastructure.

The obstacle is not technology. Ethereum works. Smart contracts work. Digital wallets work. Startups are already building AI-native financial infrastructure from payroll to treasury management on these rails, and the tools are maturing faster than the institutions adopting them. The obstacle is distribution. Institutional investors hold assets through custodians, prime brokers, and fund administrators whose systems are not designed for blockchain settlement. Every intermediary in the chain must upgrade or be replaced. JPMorgan’s strategy is to be the intermediary that upgrades rather than the one that gets replaced. Kinexys is the bank’s attempt to build blockchain infrastructure inside the existing financial system, rather than outside it.

Central banks are assembling their own teams to identify where new technologies can accelerate financial operations, and tokenization sits alongside AI as a capability that could transform how monetary institutions function. The European Central Bank’s exploration of generative AI in financial infrastructure is part of the same institutional pattern: legacy institutions moving toward technologies they once dismissed, at a pace that reflects necessity rather than enthusiasm.

JPMorgan’s second tokenized fund is not a product launch. It is a position statement. The bank that built the modern plumbing of global finance is rebuilding that plumbing on the blockchain, one money market fund at a time, because it has concluded that the infrastructure the crypto industry built is better than the infrastructure it is replacing. The tokens settle faster. The records are more transparent. The custody is more programmable. The only thing the blockchain lacked was institutional credibility. JPMorgan just filed the paperwork to provide it.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link