I tried a simpler Kindle setup, and now I’m reading more than ever


There are so many ways today for readers like me to consume content. You could check out an Audible subscription and, in turn, listen to some awesomely narrated audiobooks by celebrities, or check out some new releases. Or you could do it the old-fashioned way and head to your local bookstore to pick up the latest release. But for me, I’ve leaned more into e-reading.

Whether it’s on a Kindle, a computer, or my phone, I think having the technology to read wherever I want has changed the game. But in this day and age, where we are constantly trying to find better ways to read, my Kindle set-up was a little messy. Now, I’ve tried a much better setup that has me reading more than ever. Here are the steps I took.

I keep a minimal library

The fewer books, the better

Me showing off my library on my Kindle Credit: Alexandra Ramos

This is probably the biggest thing I suggest you do—please keep your library minimal.

As someone who has experienced the rise of Kindle and how many books you can keep on it firsthand, I know it is very tempting as a reader to just keep adding. It’s even more tempting when you have a Kindle Unlimited subscription, and all you can think about is how many books are available to check out, including some of those famous books that are just openly available to read.

But I beg you not to add every single new book that you read or buy under the sun. In fact, I would suggest keeping only one book at a time, or no more than a few.

The reason I say this is that the ability of choice, as fortunate as it is, can also hinder us. Having that many options all at once can sometimes feel overwhelming, and too much choice can hinder the process of choosing.

Having one book to focus on makes it easier to lock into whatever new book you’re checking out. And then from there, you can at least put it on your shelf and go back to it once you’ve finished. But at least at that point, you have finished it, and it’s just smoke and mirrors in the back of your mind.

I disabled the Goodreads integration

Block out competition

what the Goodreads homepage looks like Credit: Goodreads

Another big thing that I did was disable Goodreads on my Kindle.

Goodreads really is a great website. I personally don’t think it’s the best reading tracker out there, but I do believe that if you’re going to have an online database of readers who are going to share updates about what they’re reading, that’s the place to do it.

One would think that having Goodreads integrated on your Kindle—where it automatically updates your pages for you or whatever book you’re reading, or gives you notifications on other readers—would be great. But in reality, it’s not.

I think Goodreads is fantastic in small doses. But at a certain point, it can almost feel like a challenge to keep reading to keep up with your friends on the platform, and that can lead to burnout.

Disabling Goodreads and pop-up notifications of any kind will not only take away the pressure but also make it so much easier for you to focus on your book instead of trying to see what the next big novel is. Or what page your amazingly fast-reader friend might be on. It also eliminates decision fatigue, so you’re not focusing on everyone else’s books, and can instead focus on the one or two you already have downloaded.

Kindle Unlimited logo.


What Is Kindle Unlimited, and Is It Worth It?

Is it the Netflix for books?

I deleted anything that had nothing to do with reading

No more internet time

a-kindle-paperwhite-showing-a-chessboard-on-a-yellow-backdrop. Credit: Faisal Rasool/How-toGeek/Nano Banana

While Goodreads did have something to do with reading, one other thing I would suggest that you do (and that I did) is to disable anything that has nothing to do with reading.

Most popular e-readers aren’t the kind of tablets that are like an iPad and can do a ton of stuff. But there are still plenty of distractions on there that could keep you from reading as much. On the Kindle Scribe, even having the notebook feature could cause distractions from your reading. Or, on many Kindles, the ability to browse the internet is a dangerous feature.

If you struggle to have control over screentime when it comes to those features, it can be hard to bounce back and focus on reading. But thankfully, just a quick trip to the settings of these devices can disable their use so you can fully focus on reading.

Obviously, if you don’t struggle with this, you don’t have to disable features. But for someone like me, who does have some trouble from time to time, it’s really helped me focus much better.

I enabled the clock feature

Time to stay on track

Me showing off the clock on my Kindle Credit: Alexandra Ramos

I know this might not make sense at first, but hear me out.

The default settings on your Kindle don’t automatically show your clock. You have to go into the little settings area to turn it on (the “Aa button). But I have noticed that every time I turn on the clock, I get a substantial amount of reading done.

The key for me is to plan out reading blocks. When I have the clock right there in front of me, it’s so easy for me to look at the time, think about reading for an hour, and lock in so that I can take a quick glance at the clock to know what time it is. But because I dedicated that exact hour to it, I read more.

Aside from that, it also helps keep you on track with your daily tasks so that you don’t end up getting too lost in the world of reading. But since this is an article about how to read more, I’d say we can just let that slide for now.


There are so many ways to use your Kindle, but since it is an e-reader, we need to make sure we’re getting the most out of it. Let’s all hope we have better days of reading ahead of us.

amazon kindle

Storage

16GB

Screen Size

6-inches

Even in the budget department, the Amazon Kindle is a stellar value, from its light and compact design, to its adjustable front light and 6-inch display.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link