Half of all US employees use AI at work now – and waste almost 8 hours a week doing it


gettyimages-2248374027-1

EschCollection/DigitalVision/Getty

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Half of employees now use AI at work at least occasionally.
  • Many of them also don’t know their employers’ AI strategy.
  • AI is boosting productivity, but not reshaping workflows.

Half of all employees now use AI at work at least a few times each year, Gallup reported on Monday. Up from 46% last quarter, the new figure marks the polling company’s highest-ever reported rate of AI usage in the workplace.

Among more frequent AI users, the number of employees who report using the technology on a daily basis was also up (13% compared to 12% last quarter), as were those who report using it a few times each week (28% vs. 26%).

Based on a February survey of more than 23,700 US employees, the new report from Gallup highlights both that the use of AI in the workplace is continuing to climb and also that this increase is causing some structural changes within organizations.

The ‘integration-adoption lag’

The poll found that 41% of respondents said their employers had begun officially incorporating the use of AI tools to boost organizational efficiency, a notably higher figure than the 28% of employees who are using it at least every week. Gallup calls this an “integration-adoption lag”: employers’ adoption of AI doesn’t automatically translate to widespread employee use.

Also: More workers are using AI, but don’t know if their employers are, too – why that’s a problem

At the same time, while 41% of employees said their employers had begun using AI internally “to improve organizational practices,” far fewer (26%) said they have a roadmap: that their employers have not “communicated a clear plan for integrating AI into current practices.” It echoes another recent Gallup poll, which found that just under one-quarter of employees surveyed didn’t know if their employer had deployed any kind of organization-wide AI tools — a communication gap between the top brass and the rank and file which, if the former actually is actively trying to onboard AI tools, could undercut the very productivity gains those are supposed to enable.

In short, while employees seem increasingly confident that their employers are using AI in some organization-wide capacity, many of those employers still aren’t communicating the terms and scale of that usage in a clear, organized manner, which, according to Gallup, “may contribute to low comfort levels and limited adoption.”

Structural shifts

Within those organizations that have actively begun using AI (and have clearly communicated that usage to their employees), the new Gallup poll found some internal restructuring: 27% of respondents employed by those companies reported major recent changes to employee headcount, compared to 17% of those working for companies that haven’t adopted AI. 

Those changes were both positive — meaning more employees were hired — and negative — meaning more were laid off.

Also: This AI expert says the job apocalypse isn’t coming, even if you’re a coder – here’s why

The changes were most prominent within small and medium-sized businesses. For example, out of all the survey respondents working for “AI-adopting organizations” with a headcount of 25-499, 39% said their employer has been hiring more employees, while 17% said their employer has been letting more people go, compared to 32% and 14%, respectively, for respondents working for companies that haven’t adopted AI.

Changes to workflows

Another important finding from the new Gallup poll is related to the tangible impacts of AI usage upon employees’ day-to-day workflows.

While two-in-three respondents said the technology has made them more productive at work, far fewer (just 12%) said they “strongly” feel that it’s “transformed how work gets done.” In other words, AI is like an energy jolt to existing procedures, but it’s not (yet) fundamentally reshaping the procedures themselves. Employees are effectively using AI to do what they’ve always done, only faster.

Also: Will AI steal your job? It’s complicated, new survey reveals

A recent report published by software company WalkMe, however, found that the growing use of AI in the workplace is actually leading to a lot of wasted time. 

Though enterprise-facing AI is generally designed to help employees cut back on routine tasks so they can focus on more impactful, cognitively demanding work, the new WalkMe data showed that lots of working time is now being sunk into just trying to get these tools to function properly. Many employees are spending moments each week transferring data from one tool to another, for example, or rephrasing prompts over and over again in order to produce a desired outputs.

All of those moments add up. The authors of that report estimated that employees using AI are wasting on average 7.9 hours per week — about 51 working days per year — due to the accumulation of all these little moments. “Employees are losing one full working day every week to friction, not to actual work, but to managing the tools that are supposed to help them work,” they wrote.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Do you ever walk past a person on the streets exhibiting mental health issues and wonder what happened to their family? I have a brother—or at least, I used to. I worry about where he is and hope he is safe. He hasn’t taken my call since 2014.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

When I was 13, I had a very bad day. I was in the back of the car, and what I remember most was the world-crushing sound violently panging off every surface: he was pounding his fists into the steering wheel, and I worried it would break apart. He was screaming at me and my mother, and I remember the web of saliva and tears hanging over his mouth. His eyes were red, and I knew this day would change everything between us. My brother was sick.

Nearly 20 years later, I still have trouble thinking about him. By the time we realized he was mentally ill, he was no longer a minor. The police brought him to a facility for the standard 72-hour hold, where he was diagnosed with paranoid delusional schizophrenia. Concluding he was not a danger to himself or others, they released him.

There was only one problem: at 18, my brother told the facility he was not related to us and that we were imposters. When they let him out, he refused to come home.

My parents sought help and even arranged for medication, but he didn’t take it. Before long, he disappeared.

My brother’s decline and disappearance had nothing to do with the common narratives about drug use or criminal behavior. He was sick. By the time my family discovered his condition, he was already 18 and legally independent from our custody.

The last time he let me visit, I asked about his bed. I remember seeing his dirty mattress on the floor beside broken glass and garbage. I also asked about the laptop my parents had gifted him just a year earlier. He needed the money, he said—and he had maxed out my parents’ credit card.

In secret from my parents, I gave him all the cash I had saved. I just wanted him to be alright.

My parents and I tried texting and calling him; there was no response except the occasional text every few weeks. But weeks turned into months.

Before long, I was graduating from high school. I begged him to come. When I looked in the bleachers, he was nowhere to be seen. I couldn’t help but wonder what I had done wrong.

The last time I heard from him was over the phone in 2014. I tried to tell him about our parents and how much we all missed him. I asked him to be my brother again, but he cut me off, saying he was never my brother. After a pause, he admitted we could be friends. Making the toughest call of my life, I told him he was my brother—and if he ever remembers that, I’ll be there, ready for him to come back.

I’m now 32 years old. I often wonder how different our lives would have been if he had been diagnosed as a minor and received appropriate care. The laws in place do not help families in my situation.

My brother has no social media, and we suspect he traded his phone several years ago. My family has hired private investigators over the years, who have also worked with local police to try to track him down.

One private investigator’s report indicated an artist befriended my brother many years ago. When my mother tried contacting the artist, they said whatever happened between them was best left in the past and declined to respond. My mom had wanted to wish my brother a happy 30th birthday.

My brother grew up in a safe, middle-class home with two parents. He had no history of drug use or criminal record. He loved collecting vintage basketball cards, eating mint chocolate chip ice cream, and listening to Motown music. To my parents, there was no smoking gun indicating he needed help before it was too late.

The next time you think about a person screaming outside on the street, picture their families. We need policies and services that allow families to locate and support their loved ones living with mental illness, and stronger protections to ensure that individuals leaving facilities can transition into stable care. Current laws, including age-based consent rules, the limits of 72-hour holds, and the lack of step-down or supported housing options, leave too many families without resources when a serious diagnosis occurs.

Governments and lawmakers need to do better for people like my brother. As someone who thinks about him every day, I can tell you the burden is too heavy to carry alone.

James Finney-Conlon is a concerned brother and mental health advocate. He can be reached at [email protected].



Source link