‘Finally, a boomless headset for the office’: How Jabra made headphones I’d take to a boardroom


dsc05043.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Streamlined, lightweight design
  • Exceptional call quality
  • Robust business features
Cons

  • Pricey
  • Best suited for indoor environments
  • Finicky wireless charging pad

more buying choices

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Jabra’s latest premium office headphones line, the Evolve3 series, comes with a redesign: they ditch the foam earcups for fabric, and completely do away with the boom mic. I know this approach might be considered blasphemy for a business headset, but the trade-off is a sleek, lightweight build that works very well as a hybrid pair you can actually wear out of the office. 

Also: Are work headsets a gimmick? I tested a pair, and it actually made calls more enjoyable

The Evolve3 75 headphones are one step down from the company’s most premium model, the Evolve3 85, and although they’re not cheap (regularly priced around $450), they come with a replaceable battery, a five-year warranty, and are more durable than they might appear.

I’ve been using the headset for a few weeks now. Although primarily marketed as a business headset, the device stands out as an adaptable hybrid pair with great call quality, solid audio, and a featherweight form factor. And yes, they even hold up on the subway here in New York. 

Best headphone deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

Fit and build

I generally prefer a low-profile pair of headphones. I don’t like big, chunky earcups, and let’s be real, most business-minded headsets aren’t winning any awards for sleek design. But Jabra wants to challenge that stereotype with the Evolve3 75.

This pair has an excellent fit. Their compact build is minimal and streamlined without sticking out. They’re also very secure without feeling tight or restrictive, allowing for long-term wear, thanks to the 180g weight, which feels well-balanced. When I first picked them up, I remember thinking, “Finally, a boomless headset for the office.”

Also: The most comfortable pair of headphones I’ve tried isn’t made by Sony or Bose

However, I will say that the full coverage cloth earcups might feel warmer than other synthetic plastic or foam materials. If you prefer around-ear-style headphones, you’d be better off opting for the Evolve3 85 — the brand’s highest-tier device with a more premium design (and price point to match, starting at $500 on sale). 

The Evolve3 75 headset is also very portable. The included travel pouch, while not the highest quality, is crazy thin, measuring just a little over an inch in thickness. When I first saw it, I thought the case was empty and needed to be expanded, but sure enough, the headset was folded up inside. This feature alone makes the device one of the best business headsets to travel with that I’ve ever tried.

Jabra Evolve3 75

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

The earcups’ textured cloth covering looks and feels good, but they’re a little hollow, as pressing down in the middle reveals the speaker. I also wonder about the material’s durability over time, particularly around the edges where the fabric typically starts to unravel. On the ears, however, the cups feel sufficiently plush, form a good seal, and hardly move or shift at all, even if you bend over.

Call quality 

The headset’s low profile is underscored by the lack of a boom mic, which is typically the biggest giveaway for a business device. Instead, the mics are located on the front sides of the earcups. In my testing, I found that the vocals were crisp and clear, if at times just slightly quieter than both the Logitech Zone Wireless 2 ES and the Epos Impact 500, both of which produce that exceptionally “close” audio quality you get with a mic inches from your mouth. 

That’s not to say that vocal quality suffered with the Evolve3 75, because it doesn’t. I routinely took calls while walking around Manhattan, and callers on the other end told me the audio was loud and clear. When I wasn’t speaking, there was silence; when I was, background noise was mitigated. 

Also: Do Apple’s new AirPods Max 2 beat the AirPods Pro 3? I’ve tried both, here’s my take

Another reason calls sound so good on the Evolve3 75 is Jabra’s sidetone, which passes your voice through the headphones so you can hear it, even with ANC on. It’s executed well: your voice sounds natural and subtle, not booming or overly processed, and you can control the volume in the app. The feature is also automatic; the user doesn’t have to fiddle with any settings, it just sounds good out of the box. 

Regarding music quality, sure, these headphones don’t match the all-encompassing audiophile quality of the Sony WH-1000XM6, but they sound great as an everyday pair for commuting. I will, however, say that they are best relegated to use in the office or on routine commutes. While you can wear them to the gym, the cloth earcups aren’t exactly moisture-wicking. 

Business features 

Jabra Evolve3 75

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

Despite their hybrid appeal, these cans ultimately are business headphones designed for the office first. They come with a USB-A dongle, which guarantees the device will work with any computer you have, regardless of how out-of-date its Bluetooth codecs are. Crucially, the headset also supports multi-point connectivity, meaning you can switch seamlessly between your computer and your smartphone, a requirement for any hybrid pair. 

For business consideration, the device offers a host of enterprise-specific features, including remote management that allows IT teams to deploy and troubleshoot dozens of working pairs simultaneously. On-device encryption provides enhanced security at the enterprise level. 

Also: I tested the Suunto Spark earbuds for a month: Why air conduction audio is a winner

The cans also come with a dedicated Microsoft Teams button on the right earcup for users who benefit from that kind of hotkey, and a USB-C port for charging or, if you prefer, a wired connection or wired charging. 

Battery and charging

The Evolve3 75 comes with its own wireless charging stand that connects to the headset’s left earcup, offering a place to store and charge the device. Unfortunately, however, the stand is not the easiest to use as you have to place the headphones just right on the charging pad, or the headset will tip over. 

Battery life is fantastic overall, though. Jabra says you get 22 hours of battery life for calls and 110 hours of music playback, with five hours of power from just five minutes of charging. I haven’t been able to verify the 100 hours of audio playback, but I can attest to very good battery life, on par with, and slightly better than, its competitors. 

ZDNET’s buying advice

Jabra’s Evolve3 75 is a successful expression of the professional’s hybrid headset. The headphones have the build and hardware to function as a standard all-around pair of cans, but with business-minded features like dedicated call controls, encryption, and remote management. 

The light, compact form, coupled with the exceedingly thin carrying case and dual nature as an office and general-purpose device, makes them an excellent travel headset. Their ANC won’t completely block out your environment, but the trade-off is comfort you can wear for hours at a time.

Also: 3 simple tweaks that have made my headphones last years longer – Sony and Bose included

However, the Evolve3 75 aren’t cheap, regularly priced around $450, which is essentially the same price as the aforementioned baseline for audiophile headsets, Sony’s WH-1000XM6. 

If you need the absolute lightest, coolest pair of business headphones out there, I recommend the Epos Impact 500, but keep in mind they have a boom mic. If you want a more affordable business headset, check out the Logitech Zone Wireless 2 ES

Why the Jabra Evolve3 75 gets an Editor’s Choice award

We awarded the Evolve3 75 headset an Editors’ Choice award for its successful execution of a hybrid business headset that works well outside the office. Although its price point demands commitment to the form factor, it has the features business users will find valuable, along with solid ANC, great battery, and a svelte form factor. It’s not a headset you go jogging with, but it’s just as good in the office as it is on the commute home. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link