The FBI just cracked open Signal texts on an iPhone. Here’s how to lock yours down


Signal has long been one of the most secure messaging apps available. It uses end-to-end encryption, collects very little data, and offers features like disappearing messages to keep conversations private. For many users, it’s the go-to app when privacy actually matters. While that hasn’t changed, a recent case shows how parts of your conversation may still be exposed. The good news is there’s an easy way to prevent this.

How the FBI recovered Signal messages from an iPhone

According to a report by 404 Media, the FBI recently managed to recover deleted Signal messages from an iPhone. The method did not involve breaking Signal’s encryption. Instead, investigators retrieved the messages from data stored by iOS itself.

To understand how this works, it helps to know how iPhones handle notifications. When message previews are enabled, iOS temporarily stores parts of incoming messages so they can be displayed in the notification preview. That data can persist outside the app, even after the messages are deleted within Signal or the app itself is deleted.

In this case, the FBI reportedly extracted those cached notification previews. Only incoming messages were recovered, based on available details, but that still means part of conversations can exist beyond Signal’s encrypted environment.

It’s worth noting that this is not a flaw in Signal’s encryption. Messages remain secure in transit and within the app. The issue lies in how iOS handles convenience features like notification previews, which can create a secondary copy of message content.

How to stop your iPhone from exposing Signal messages

There are two ways to plug this loophole. One involves changing your iPhone’s settings, while the other focuses on Signal itself. The former stops iOS from storing message previews, while the latter limits what the app allows to be shown outside its encrypted environment.

If you don’t want iOS to make a copy of message content, you should disable notification previews. To do this, head to Settings > Notifications > Show Previews, and set it to “When Unlocked” or “Never.” The first option ensures message content is only shown in previews when your phone is unlocked, while the second disables previews entirely and is the safer choice.

This method works well if you use multiple apps for private conversations, as it doesn’t require adjusting settings for each one individually. However, if you still want previews for other apps while disabling them for Signal, you can tweak the app’s settings instead.

Open Signal, tap the profile icon in the top left corner, and go to Settings > Notifications. Then tap on “Show” under the Notification Content section and select either “Name Only” or “No Name or Content.” This prevents message content from appearing in notification previews while still allowing you to receive alerts.

What this means for your privacy

This isn’t something most users need to worry about on a day-to-day basis. The kind of data extraction used in this case requires physical access to the device and is not a widespread vulnerability being exploited by authorities.

But it does highlight how privacy works in practice. Using a secure app is only part of the equation. The operating system, its default settings, and even small convenience features can affect how your data is actually protected.

Signal is still one of the most secure messaging apps you can use. But if you rely on it for private conversations, it’s worth taking a few minutes to make sure your iPhone isn’t undermining that security.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The battle between AMD and NVIDIA rages on eternally, it seems, though it’s rather a one-sided battle in the desktop PC market, where NVIDIA holds something like 95%, and AMD most of what’s left apart from Intel’s (almost) 1%.

But as dominant and popular as NVIDIA is, AMD proponents could always raise the value argument. On a per-dollar basis, you get more value with an AMD card, and even better, you have the benefit of AMD “FineWine” which ensures your card will become even better with time.

What “FineWine” meant—and why it mattered

FineWine was something that AMD fans began to notice during the GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture. Incidentally, the last AMD dedicated GPU I bought was the R9 390, which was of that lineage. Since then, all my AMD GPUs have been embedded in consoles or handheld PCs, but I digress.

The R9 390 is actually a good example of FineWine. Launched in 2015, like many AMD cards, the R9 390 had a rough start, and I sold mine in exchange for a stopgap card in the form of the RTX 2060, because I wanted to play Cyberpunk 2077 on PC, where it wasn’t broken the way it was on consoles. Even though, on paper, the raw power of the RTX 2060 wasn’t much more than a 390, the AMD card’s performance on my (then) 1080p monitor was a stuttery mess, whereas everything suddenly ran great on my 2060 the minute the AMD GPU was expunged from the system.

But, a decade later, that same game is perfectly playable on this card, as you can see in this TechLabUK video.

A lot of it is because the developers have kept patching and improving the game, but this is something you see across the board for AMD cards on various games. This is FineWine. Years later, with continued driver updates from AMD, the cards go from being a little worse than their NVIDIA equivalent at launch to being as good or even a little better in the long run.

Of course, that’s not super helpful to customers who buy hardware at launch, but it has given some AMD users computers with longer lifespans than you’d think, and made many used AMD cards an even better bargain.

Why AMD’s FineWine era worked

A bit of smoke and mirrors

The PULSE AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT next to an AMD RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

FineWine wasn’t magic, of course. The phenomenon was the result of a mix of factors. AMD’s architectures were in some cases a little too forward-thinking for the APIs of the day. Massively parallel with a focus on compute, they’d only come into their own with DirectX 12 and more modern games. NVIDIA’s cards at the time were better optimized to run current games well. Over time, NVIDIA cards would make similar architectural changes, but with better timing.

The other reason FineWine was a thing came down to driver maturity. As a much smaller company with fewer resources, it seems that AMD had some trouble releasing cards with optimized drivers. So, over time, the card would start performing as intended.

In both cases, you could frame FineWine not as the card getting better, but rather getting “less worse” over time. If you set the bar low at launch, the only way is up. However, there’s a third factor to take into account as well. AMD dominates console gaming. The two major home console series have now run on AMD GPUs for two generations, and so games are developed with that hardware in mind. This also gives newer titles a bit of a leg up, though it’s hard to know exactly by how much.

How AMD moved on from FineWine

It seems worse, but it’s actually better

An AMD RX 9070 XT Gigabyte gaming graphics card. Credit: Ismar Hrnjicevic / How-To Geek

With the shift to RDNA architecture, AMD made a deliberate change in philosophy. Modern Radeon GPUs are designed to perform well right out of the gate. Reviews on day one are much closer to what you could expect years later. There are still decent gains to be had on RDNA cards with game-specific optimizations (Spider-Man on PC is a great example), but the golden age of FineWine seems to be in the past now.

That’s a good thing! Products should put their best foot forward on day one, so let’s not shed a tear for FineWine in that regard. So it’s not so much that AMD doesn’t care about improving the performance and stability of older cards over the years, it’s that the company is now better at its job, and so there’s less room for improvement.

Sapphire NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT GPU

Cooling Method

Air

GPU Speed

2520Mhz

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT from Sapphire features 16GB of DDR6 memory, two HDMI and two DisplayPorts, and an overengineered cooling setup that will keep the card cool and whisper quiet no matter the workload.


NVIDIA kept the idea—but changed the formula

It’s all about AI

It’s funny, but these days I think of NVIDIA cards as the ones with major longevity. Take the venerable GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti cards. These cards only lost game-ready driver support in 2025, which doesn’t immediately make them useless, it just means no more optimization for those chips. What an incredible run, getting a decade of relevant game performance from a GPU!

But, that’s not really NVIDIA’s take on FineWine. Instead, the company has taken to adding new and better features to its cards long after they’ve been launched. Starting with the 20-series, the presence of machine-learning hardware means that by improving the AI algorithms for technologies like DLSS, these cards have become more performant with better image quality over time.

While NVIDIA has made some features of its AI technology exclusive to each generation, so far all post 10-series GPUs benefit from every new generation of DLSS. Compare that to AMD which not only offers inferior versions of this new upscaling technology, but has locked the better, more usable versions to later cards, such as the case with FSR Redstone.


FineWine is an ethos, not a brand

In the case of my humble RTX 4060 laptop, the release of DLSS 4.5 has opened new possibilities, notably the ability to target a 4K output resolution, which was certainly not on the table when I first took this computer out of the box. We might not call it “FineWine,” but it sure smells like it to me!



Source link