The 2000s GPU aesthetic was gloriously weird—and we’re worse off without it


Do you remember how graphics cards used to be fun? And no, I don’t just mean that they used to have mind-blowing specs and huge gen-on-gen performance gains. I mean when their designs were actually fun. And mildly horrifying, but that’s another thing entirely.

In the late ’90s and all throughout the ’00s, detailed, colorful, bizarre, and wild GPU shroud designs were much less unusual than they are now. And don’t even get me started on the box art. Can we have them back now, please?

Modern GPUs all look so bland

And sure, no one buys them for their looks, but still

I love graphics cards, and every new release is (almost) just as thrilling as the previous one. But let’s face it: modern GPUs just don’t look that exciting. In fact, unless you’re an expert or an enthusiast, you’ll struggle to tell them apart if there’s no obvious model/manufacturer sign on the shroud or on the backplate.



















Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

The Legacy of 3dfx

From Glide to the grave — test your knowledge of the company that revolutionized PC gaming graphics forever.

HistoryHardwareTechnologyIndustryInnovation

In what year did 3dfx Interactive file for bankruptcy and sell its assets to NVIDIA?

Correct! 3dfx filed for bankruptcy in late 2000, and NVIDIA acquired its key assets — including patents and engineers — for around $70 million. It was a stunning fall for a company that had dominated the GPU market just years earlier.

Not quite. 3dfx filed for bankruptcy in 2000, not the year you chose. NVIDIA swooped in to purchase their intellectual property and hire their talent, effectively ending 3dfx as a competitive force and accelerating NVIDIA’s own dominance.

What was the name of 3dfx’s proprietary graphics API that gave their cards a major competitive advantage in the late 1990s?

Correct! Glide was 3dfx’s proprietary low-level graphics API that offered developers direct access to the hardware, resulting in superior performance and visual quality compared to rivals. Many iconic late-90s games were optimized specifically for Glide.

Not quite. The answer is Glide, 3dfx’s own proprietary API. Unlike Direct3D or OpenGL, Glide was hardware-specific, which gave 3dfx cards a stunning edge in compatible games — but also tied developers tightly to their ecosystem, a double-edged sword in the long run.

What was the groundbreaking product that launched 3dfx to fame in 1996 and is widely credited with beginning the 3D gaming revolution?

Correct! The original Voodoo Graphics card, often called Voodoo1, launched in 1996 and was a revelation. It brought arcade-quality 3D graphics to home PCs at a relatively affordable price, transforming games like Quake into breathtaking experiences.

Not quite. It was the original Voodoo Graphics (Voodoo1) released in 1996 that launched 3dfx’s legacy. The Voodoo2 came later and pushed things even further, but it was the original Voodoo that first made consumers and developers take notice of dedicated 3D acceleration.

What controversial business decision did 3dfx make in 1998 that many analysts believe contributed to their downfall?

Correct! 3dfx acquired STB Technologies to manufacture their own graphics cards, cutting out third-party board makers. This alienated partners, reduced their retail presence, and stretched their resources thin — a strategic mistake that helped NVIDIA and ATI capture the market.

Not quite. The pivotal mistake was acquiring STB Technologies in 1998 to become their own board manufacturer. This cut off crucial relationships with third-party add-in board partners, who quickly turned to NVIDIA instead — dramatically expanding NVIDIA’s market reach at 3dfx’s expense.

3dfx pioneered which multi-GPU technology that allowed users to link two Voodoo2 cards together for higher performance?

Correct! 3dfx introduced SLI — Scan-Line Interleave — with the Voodoo2, allowing two cards to split rendering duties line by line. This concept was so influential that NVIDIA later revived the SLI branding (as Scalable Link Interface) for their own multi-GPU technology decades later.

Not quite. The answer is SLI, which stood for Scan-Line Interleave in 3dfx’s implementation. NVIDIA later borrowed the SLI name — rebranding it as Scalable Link Interface — for their own multi-GPU solution, a clear nod to how influential 3dfx’s original concept truly was.

Which visual quality feature, heavily associated with 3dfx Voodoo cards, became a must-have benchmark for 3D graphics quality in the late 1990s?

Correct! 3dfx’s Voodoo5 was a pioneer in Full-Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA), which smoothed jagged edges on 3D objects. While the Voodoo5 launched too late and too expensively to save the company, FSAA became a foundational feature that every modern GPU still implements in various forms.

Not quite. Full-Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) was the standout visual feature 3dfx championed, particularly with the Voodoo5. Though the Voodoo5 arrived too late to turn the tide for the company, FSAA itself became one of the most enduring features in GPU development, refined and expanded by every graphics card maker since.

Which company primarily benefited from 3dfx’s collapse by absorbing their talent, patents, and market share to become the dominant GPU manufacturer?

Correct! NVIDIA was the primary beneficiary of 3dfx’s collapse. By purchasing their patents and hiring key engineers, NVIDIA gained crucial intellectual property and expertise that helped cement their position as the world’s leading discrete GPU manufacturer — a position they still hold today.

Not quite. NVIDIA was the company that truly capitalized on 3dfx’s downfall. While ATI did gain some market share as well, it was NVIDIA that bought 3dfx’s assets and absorbed their engineers, using that foundation to build an almost unassailable lead in the discrete GPU market.

What is considered one of 3dfx’s most lasting legacies in the modern GPU industry?

Correct! 3dfx’s greatest legacy is democratizing 3D acceleration for consumers and pioneering multi-GPU technology with SLI. Their work forced the entire industry to prioritize real-time 3D performance, directly shaping the competitive GPU landscape that produced the powerful graphics cards we rely on today.

Not quite. 3dfx’s most enduring legacy is their role in making consumer 3D acceleration mainstream and inventing the SLI multi-GPU concept. These contributions forced every competitor — especially NVIDIA and ATI — to innovate rapidly, establishing the fiercely competitive GPU industry that still drives graphics technology forward today.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

99% of all GPUs currently made are some mix of black, with maybe a dash of silver. Sometimes, you’ll find vendor-specific coloring elements, like red for AMD, green for Nvidia, or blue for Intel. But I’m not talking all over the shroud; I’m talking small accents that don’t make much of a difference one way or another.

And sure, we don’t buy graphics cards for their aesthetics. But since they’re so expensive right now, would it really hurt if they looked a bit better?

Not everyone cares about the aesthetics of their PC build, so for most people, going down the boring route is the way to go. But for some of us who actually want a fun-looking PC, the state of the GPU market is disappointing, as far as unique designs are concerned.

And it wasn’t always like this. Far from. The ’90s and the ’00s were a wild period for PC graphics, and it wasn’t just the specs; the designs were out of this world, too.

GPU makers used to sell hardware with attitude

Combined with a dash of terror

6800 Ultra GeForce Credit: VGA Museum

Back in the ’90s, ’00s, and even into the 2010s, GPU makers didn’t seem remotely interested in looking restrained. Many GPUs had a completely unabashed “gamer aesthetic,” and back then, that was a lot more pronounced than the RGB we’re being fed these days. Back then, it meant fantasy, horror, or sci-fi-themed designs, and sometimes, it was a mix of all of those genres. You’d get a mix of wizards, chrome cyborgs, goblins, sea gods, tribal graphics, and female characters in armor … well, some armor, at least.

Even when the card itself was fairly normal, the whole product was loud, specific, and unforgettable. You wouldn’t mistake one of those GPUs for a different model, that’s for sure.

Sometimes, the hardware joined in, too. You got bright red or blue PCBs, chunky coolers with odd shapes, translucent plastic, metallic accents, weird mascots, and shrouds that looked like a toy. A lot of it was ugly, but with my nostalgia goggles firmly on, I still want these GPUs to come back.

All of the fun mostly disappeared once GPUs got bigger, hotter, and pricier. Modern cards have to move serious heat, survive shipping at absurd sizes, and appeal to a global market. And the market is now largely into black, RGB, or all-white builds, so what does a goblin zombie wizard cyborg-type thing have to do with any of that?

The boxes were their own genre of unique

And ‘unique’ doesn’t necessarily mean ‘pretty’

Manufacturers have more space on GPU boxes, but you’d still be hard-pressed to find some wild art on a regular GPU box. Meanwhile, those boxes used to be their own little subculture. The card inside might have had a fairly ordinary shroud, but the front of the box was doing everything it could to scream at you loudly from a store shelf.

“Sleek” and “elegant” were much less of a thing; the point was to capture the attention of gamers, and back then, games didn’t look like they do today. These days, we have Nvidia’s DLSS 5 to turn in-game characters into uncanny valley, nearly-real-but-not-quite faces; back then, games didn’t look realistic, and so GPU boxes were a lot more “out there.”

Some box art was downright cursed, but most was genuinely fun. You had stuff like the Asus GeForce 256 box with that strange child on the front, Leadtek’s endless obsession with wizards, the deeply cursed face on the Hercules 3D Prophet 9500 Pro, and Sapphire boxes that looked like they were selling a fantasy RPG instead of a graphics card. PNY got in on it too with tribal graphics, angel wings, and enough visual chaos to make the whole thing feel more like a mixtape cover than a PC component.

The art may not have had a lot to do with the hardware itself, but it was so fitting for the era. The tech of the 2000s was filled with excess, and the marketing was a lot louder, which is what gave us some of these unexpected gems. But now? You’re going to get a black box with elements of green, red, or blue, and you’re going to like it.

We don’t need every GPU to be tasteful

I just want my PC to look awesome

These days, if you want a cool-looking GPU, you’re probably out of luck. There are some options, like the Asus Astral GeForce RTX 5090 Dhahab Edition (priced at over $10,000), or the Gigabyte Aorus RTX 5090 Infinity, which does give me that throwback kind of feeling, but it’s not the same thing.

If you’re desperate for fun designs, manufacturers like Yeston or Colorful do release them from time to time. You’ll find a lot of pastel and anime-themed GPUs. However, those are mostly available in Asia, and importing one from overseas can be a real hassle – if it’s even possible at all. For the rest of us, it’s plain old designs, take it or leave it.


I need a T-rex on an RTX 6090, stat

Look, I’m a simple human being. I just want my hardware to look fun. I already get made fun of for still loving RGB in the year 2026, but I deal with that. But why is it so hard to get a GPU with a shroud that looks all kinds of colorful, wild, and isn’t necessarily an anime character? (Although some of those are admittedly very cute.)

PC aesthetics still matter, but unfortunately, with the amount of cooling these hefty GPUs need these days, we’ll have to stick to boring designs or some art on the backplate, which, unfortunately, isn’t all too visible.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link