Maple Grove Report

Maple Grove Report

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.


Rivian has once again defended its controversial decision to skip Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but this time the company says the future of in-car technology is moving beyond smartphone mirroring altogether. According to Rivian’s software leadership, rapid advances in artificial intelligence could soon make the entire CarPlay debate irrelevant.

The comments come as Rivian continues expanding its own AI-powered vehicle software ecosystem instead of adopting Apple’s popular in-car platform. For years, the company has faced criticism from buyers who wanted CarPlay support, but Rivian now believes AI assistants will eventually replace many of the functions drivers currently rely on through their phones.

Rivian wants cars to become ‘AI-defined’ instead of app-driven

Speaking during an interview on The Verge’s Decoder podcast, Rivian Chief Software Officer Wassym Bensaid said advances in AI are changing how users will interact with vehicles. He argued that deep AI integration inside cars could make traditional app-based systems like Apple CarPlay feel outdated.

According to Bensaid, Rivian sees cars evolving from being “software-defined” to becoming “AI-defined.” Instead of opening individual apps for navigation, music, messaging, or scheduling, Rivian believes future AI assistants will handle those tasks through natural conversation and contextual understanding.

That vision is already starting to take shape through the company’s recently launched Rivian Assistant. The AI-powered voice system can manage vehicle controls, answer questions, access calendar information, send messages, and interact with connected services using natural language commands. Rivian says the assistant is deeply integrated into the vehicle rather than functioning as a separate app layer.

The company argues that systems like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto create a fragmented experience because they effectively place a smartphone interface inside the car. Rivian instead wants complete control over the vehicle’s software experience, allowing AI to interact directly with the car’s systems, sensors, navigation, climate controls, and future connected services.

The stance remains controversial. Apple CarPlay continues to be one of the most requested features among many EV buyers, and Rivian previously acknowledged that a large portion of its customer base initially wanted support for it. However, the company claims demand has fallen as its native software experience has improved.

Why this matters

The debate goes far beyond Rivian itself.

Several automakers are increasingly trying to control their software ecosystems rather than handing key parts of the user experience to Apple or Google. Companies see software, subscriptions, AI services, and connected features as future revenue streams, making in-house platforms more valuable than third-party integrations.

At the same time, AI is becoming a major battleground inside vehicles. Rivian’s approach mirrors broader industry trends where carmakers are investing heavily in voice assistants, autonomous features, and AI-powered interfaces that can understand context rather than simply execute commands.

What happens next

Rivian is expected to continue expanding its AI ecosystem, especially with upcoming vehicles like the Rivian R2 and future software updates.

Whether AI can truly replace the convenience and familiarity of Apple CarPlay remains unclear. Many drivers still prefer using the apps, navigation systems, and media services they already rely on every day.

But Rivian’s message is becoming increasingly clear: instead of bringing CarPlay to its vehicles, the company wants to build something it believes will eventually make CarPlay unnecessary. The bigger question is whether customers will agree.



Source link


Every time you create a new online account, you’re handing over personal data to a server you’ll never control. Since an average person can have hundreds of online accounts on different services, that adds up to a lot of data sitting in corporate databases.

Researchers at Harvard’s Applied Social Media Lab say that this system puts your privacy at risk and makes you more vulnerable to identity theft. Their solution to this problem is Keyring, an open-source identity wallet that stores your biometric data on your phone instead.

How does Keyring actually work?

Think of it as a privacy-first digital ID. Rather than exposing your full details to every service you use, Keyring lets you share only what’s strictly necessary.

Services like Tinder have already started exploring biometric identity checks to check if the users are real humans. It shows how massive the identity problem has become across platforms on the internet.

So, if you want to verify you’re an adult, Keyring will verify that without revealing your actual birthdate. Or maybe you need to get an email account verification done; Keyring can also do that for you without exposing your username.

You authenticate through biometric data like a fingerprint or face scan, which never leaves your device. You can also add verifiable credentials like a digital driver’s license or proof of employment.

The wallet was built in collaboration with the Linux Foundation’s Decentralized Trust Graph Working Group and is already being demonstrated on Bluesky.

Keyring also lets two people verify an in-person connection without routing anything through a platform like LinkedIn. Every verified connection contributes to a decentralized trust graph, a network where no central database holds your identity data, but everyone in your circle can confirm each other’s credentials.

What’s next for the Keyring wallet?

The biggest challenge isn’t technical. Institutions, governments, and corporations would need to issue and recognize verified credentials for Keyring to work at scale.

Right now, those entities have little incentive to participate because they currently profit from owning and monetizing your data. Researchers say a grassroots push for greater data agency may be the most realistic path forward.

Harvard is also actively looking for collaborators and test partners to help shape where the project goes next.



Source link

Recent Reviews