EV batteries are lasting much longer than the industry expected


One of the biggest arguments against buying an electric vehicle has long been battery longevity. Critics have questioned whether expensive battery packs would survive beyond a few years or require costly replacements before the rest of the car wore out.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, real-world data is beginning to tell a very different story. Modern EV batteries are proving significantly more durable than expected, with many vehicles retaining most of their original range even after hundreds of thousands of miles. The findings could reshape consumer confidence as the industry continues pushing electric vehicles into the mainstream.

Real-world data suggests modern EV batteries are built for the long haul

The report highlights the case of Richard Symons, a UK-based used EV dealer whose five-year-old Tesla Model 3 has already covered 247,000 miles while still comfortably completing long-distance journeys. His experience mirrors what researchers and industry analysts are increasingly seeing across newer generations of electric vehicles: battery degradation is occurring much more slowly than many buyers originally feared.

Battery analytics company Recurrent estimates that after five years of ownership, the average EV still retains up to 95 percent of its original driving range, exceeding many early expectations. That improvement is largely due to advances in battery chemistry, thermal management systems, and sophisticated battery-management software that better protects cells from long-term wear.

Those improvements are also reflected in repair data. According to Recurrent, roughly one in 12 electric vehicles built between 2011 and 2016 eventually required battery replacements. For EVs produced from 2022 onward, that figure has dropped dramatically to just 0.3 percent. Early models such as the original Nissan Leaf lacked modern battery cooling systems, making them far more susceptible to degradation than today’s vehicles.

Consumer perception, however, has not fully caught up with reality. A 2025 survey by AutoPacific found that fears over expensive battery replacement remain the leading reason many prospective buyers avoid electric vehicles. Jessica Caldwell, head of insights at Edmunds, told the Journal that many consumers still approach EV batteries with considerable hesitation despite the improving reliability data.

That does not mean batteries are immune to wear

The report notes that frequent high-power DC fast charging accelerates battery degradation compared to slower charging methods. Data from Geotab shows batteries frequently charged at high power retain about 89.7 percent of their original capacity after several years, compared with 94.9 percent for vehicles relying primarily on lower-frequency fast charging. Charging to 100 percent regularly, allowing batteries to remain fully discharged for extended periods, and operating in extreme temperatures can also reduce long-term battery health. The comparison chart included in the report illustrates the widening gap in battery capacity between the two charging habits over time.

Battery replacement costs also remain significant, ranging from roughly $5,000 to $16,000 outside warranty depending on the manufacturer. However, many automakers now design battery packs to allow individual modules to be repaired instead of replacing the entire pack, reducing long-term ownership costs.

The findings arrive at a challenging moment for the EV industry. US electric vehicle sales have slowed in 2026 following changes to government incentives, but analysts quoted by the Journal expect adoption to resume its long-term growth. Consulting firm AlixPartners forecasts EVs will account for 11 percent of new US vehicle sales by 2030, while globally they are expected to approach 25 percent of all new car sales by the end of the decade. As more high-mileage electric vehicles continue proving their durability, one of the industry’s biggest consumer concerns may gradually begin to disappear.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link