Tesla sued over fatal Texas crash the driver says happened on Autopilot



A wrongful-death suit filed days after a Model 3 ploughed into a Katy home leans on the same argument that produced last year’s $243m Florida verdict.


The family of a 76-year-old woman killed when a Tesla crashed through the wall of her home near Houston has sued the carmaker and the driver, less than a week after the crash.

The wrongful-death suit, filed in Harris County District Court by Jennifer and Justin Barbour, the daughter and son-in-law of Martha Avila, names Tesla and 44-year-old driver Michael Butler as defendants and seeks more than $1m plus punitive damages.

It is the latest test of whether Tesla can be held liable for what its driver-assistance software does.

The crash itself is not in dispute. According to the petition, Butler was driving a Model 3 eastbound on Rose Hollow Lane at about 8pm on June 19 when the car left the road and crashed through the front wall of the Barbour family home.

Avila, standing in the front room, was airlifted to a hospital and pronounced dead of her injuries. Justin Barbour, also inside, was hurt, and the family says the home is now unliveable.

What is in dispute is what the car was doing. Butler told the Harris County Sheriff’s Office that an automated driving system was engaged, a claim the lawsuit repeats but investigators have not confirmed.

The same office said it found no evidence of a mechanical malfunction and that Butler, not intoxicated, has cooperated.

The crash already sits inside the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s special crash investigation, which will pull the event data recorder independently.

The complaint accuses Tesla of design defect and failure to warn, and the driver of negligence and gross negligence.

It alleges the vehicle failed to detect the end of the street and the house in its path, failed to monitor whether the driver was paying attention, and failed to warn owners about the limits of Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, with “sudden unintended acceleration” offered as an alternative theory. The family is represented by Chris Adkins of Zehl & Associates.

Tesla has already argued the opposite in public, before any court date. Ashok Elluswamy, the company’s head of AI software, posted that vehicle data shows Butler “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area,” reaching 73mph, and Elon Musk added that “FSD drives slowly through neighbourhood streets and this was a high speed crash.”

That points to pedal misapplication, the driver hitting the accelerator instead of the brake, which would normally be a complete defence.

That defence no longer settles the question, because of a courtroom in Florida. In August 2025, a Miami federal jury found Tesla partly responsible for a 2019 Key Largo crash in which a driver using Autopilot ran a T-intersection at roughly 62mph while reaching for a dropped phone, killing 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon.

The jury put most of the fault on the driver but still held Tesla liable for its share, about $243m, and a federal judge upheld the judgment in February.

The Texas plaintiffs have drawn the lesson that driver misuse and corporate responsibility can coexist.

Whether the argument lands here is harder. A 100% accelerator input is a more aggressive action than reaching for a phone, and Tesla’s lawyers will argue it breaks the chain of causation.

The suit arrives at an awkward moment regardless. NHTSA escalated its analysis of more than three million Teslas equipped with Full Self-Driving in March, and the company’s own driverless robotaxi fleet in Austin has reported a crash rate roughly four times worse than the human average it cites on its safety page.

The case is at its earliest stage, and the parties will fight over the vehicle data the family has asked the court to preserve. In Florida, Tesla initially told plaintiffs the crash data did not exist until an independent researcher recovered it.

The event data recorder will do more to settle what happened on Rose Hollow Lane than anything either side has posted so far.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


It’s the first of the month, which means Netflix has added a substantial number of new movies and shows. Some of the highlights include the Creed movies, Friday Night Lights, The Karate Kid franchise, and the first five seasons of Hawaii Five-0. Keep an eye on the new movies coming later this month, including Office Romance and Little Brother.

As for the thriller section, there are several movies to check out this week. My top pick is a recent crime thriller from an Academy Award-nominated director. My other two movies are total opposites. One is a disturbing psychological thriller featuring two familiar faces, while the other is a notable book-to-screen adaptation.

3

The Girl on the Train

Based on the bestselling novel

The Girl on the Train walked so that It Ends with Us could run. What do I mean? It’s not like The Girl on the Train was the first movie to be based on a book. I’m more focused on the style of thriller — a beach read that is predominantly aimed toward women. Hoover’s books continue to become box-office hits. In 2016, The Girl on the Train proved that there is an audience for this type of thriller.

Based on the novel by Paula Hawkins, The Girl on the Train stars Emily Blunt as Rachel Watson, an alcoholic divorcée who recently lost her job. To pass the time, Rachel rides the train and imagines the new life of her ex-husband, Tom (Justin Theroux), and his new wife, Anna (Rebecca Ferguson). One day, Rachel witnesses a troubling event in the backyard belonging to Scott (Luke Evans) and Megan Hipwell (Haley Bennett). The authorities don’t believe her due to her alcoholism, so Rachel will need more proof than her word.

The Girl on the Train has all the staples of a page-turning thriller. There are several twists that will make you question what is true and what is a lie. It’s a story of deceit and obsession that mixes sexual tension and disturbing violence into its storyline. Blunt gives a convincing performance as an alcoholic searching for answers in the case and in her personal life. At just under two hours, The Girl on the Train certainly delivers everything you want out of an entertaining thriller.

2

The Good Son

Kevin McCallister breaks bad

If your children enjoy the Home Alone franchise, then do not let them watch The Good Son. Speaking from experience, this movie should be consumed by teenagers and adults who are at least 17 years old. I watched this movie as a kid, and it shook me to my core. I would still recommend it because it’s genuinely one of the most shocking performances from an actor who you would never expect to take on this role.

After the death of his mother, 10-year-old Mark Evans (Elijah Wood) is sent to spend winter break with his Uncle Wallace (Daniel Hugh Kelly) and Aunt Susan (Wendy Crewson). Mark also reunited with his two young cousins, Henry (Macaulay Culkin) and Connie (Quinn Culkin). Mark quickly discovers that Henry might be the devil stuck inside a 10-year-old’s body. Henry is fascinated by death and facilitates several evil acts, including a massive car pileup. When Henry sets his sights on his own family, it’s up to Mark to stop it before it leads to tragedy.

Home Alone 2 is my favorite Christmas movie. Imagine being a kid and watching Kevin McCallister in The Good Son trying to kill his sister. Frankly, it’s disturbing. You can’t unsee what Culkin did as the devil’s child. I’ll let you judge it for yourself; my guess is you’ll agree with me.

1

Dead Man’s Wire

Inspired by a real standoff

Gus Van Sant is too talented to be sitting on the sidelines for a long period of time. Van Sant, who helmed Good Will Hunting and Milk, last made a film in 2018 called Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot. He did not make another film until Dead Man’s Wire, which had a festival premiere in 2025 before releasing in theaters in January 2026. That’s an unacceptable amount of time without a Van Sant movie. Be better, Hollywood.

Dead Man’s Wire is inspired by the true story of Tony Kiritsis, played by Bill Skarsgård. In February 1977, Tony takes mortgage broker Richard Hall (Dacre Montgomery) as his hostage after losing money on a deal brokered by Richard’s father. Tony points a sawed-off shotgun at Richard to serve as a dead man’s switch. The ensuing standoff makes headlines, as Tony tries to convince the public of what led to his breaking point.

The movie is based on a true story, so it could follow a blueprint of real-life events. However, it’s a genius idea for a thriller — a mentally unstable person seeks revenge against the corporation that wronged him. You might even find sympathy toward Tony, a credit to Skarsgård’s captivating performance.


More movies to watch this week

Thrillers are not the only genre to explore on Netflix. If you’re a fan of rom-coms, one of Netflix’s newest movies is Office Romance, a charming romantic adventure starring Jennifer Lopez and Brett Goldstein. Office Romance hits Netflix on June 5. Plus, Netflix users can stream the first six movies in the Rocky franchise.

Subscription with ads

Yes, $8/month

Simultaneous streams

Two or four




Source link