Heavys H1H headphones review: Specs, features, price


The Heavys H1H is a $274 over-ear headphone built specifically for rock and metal listeners, with an eight-driver design intended to recreate the feel of a live show. It is an unusual product in a crowded market, and it makes its case on a very specific promise.

Most headphones are designed to be broadly neutral, or to flatter whatever genre the buyer happens to favor. The Heavys H1H takes a different approach entirely.

It is built around the idea that rock and metal have specific sonic characteristics that standard headphone tuning does not serve well. The multi-driver configuration is designed to address that directly, spreading frequency reproduction across eight drivers per side rather than relying on a single unit.

The headphones were engineered by Axel Grell, formerly of Sennheiser, where he led development of the HD 800 and HD 600 series. So, it’s got good bona fides.

I’ve replaced my AirPods Max with them for six weeks.

Heavys H1H review: Specifications

Specifications Heavys H1H
Driver type Dynamic
Drivers per side 4 (2 low/mid range, 2 high frequency tweeters)
Frequency range 5 Hz to 46 kHz (wired); 5 Hz to 24 kHz (Bluetooth)
Max SPL Per IEC 62368-1
Bluetooth version 5.1
Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Wired connection 2.5mm to 3.5mm AUX cable (included); USB-C digital
Active noise cancellation HellBlocker ANC (passive + active combined)
Microphones 5 (2-mic end-fire array for calls)
Modes Wired passive, Bluetooth passive, Bluetooth ANC, Bluetooth transparent
Transparency mode Yes
App Yes (EQ and firmware updates)
Battery life Up to 50 hours
Charging USB-C
Weight 14.5 oz (410g)
Ear cup design Full-size, around-the-ear
Customization Interchangeable outer shells
Price $274 (bundle with travel case)

Heavys H1H review: Design and build

The H1H is a full-size over-ear headphone. At 14.5 oz, it is on the heavier side versus most headphones, but not the AirPods Max.

The headband and ear cups have a fairly conventional layout from the outside. The interchangeable outer shells are the most visually distinctive element, letting buyers swap in licensed artist designs from bands including Motorhead, Lamb of God, and Slayer, among others.

The ear cup shells are replaceable without tools and a wide range of official artist designs are available from Heavys separately. It is a smart system for a brand built around fan identity.

Folded over ear black headphones lying on a light surface, ear cups stacked neatly within the curved headband, suggesting a compact, portable design suitable for storage or travel

Heavys H1H review: Folded down

The headphones fold for travel and come bundled with a protective hard case in this configuration. USB-C handles both charging and digital audio input, and a 2.5mm to 3.5mm cable is included for wired passive use.

The balance is good on the headset. They are heavier than most as I’ve already said, but not so much that it’s a problem. The headset exaands to fit most heads, and I am fully aware that I have a big dome, so that was nice.

Build quality is excellent. This is not a headset shipped by a brand with too many adjacent consonants next to their name.

Heavys H1H review: The eight-driver system

The core technical claim of the H1H is its eight-driver configuration. Each side contains four drivers: two handling low and mid frequencies, and two high-frequency tweeters.

Most consumer headphones use a single dynamic driver per side. The multi-driver approach is more common in in-ear monitors used by musicians on stage, where separating frequencies across dedicated drivers can improve clarity and reduce distortion at high volumes.

Close-up of a hand holding over-ear headphones, focusing on the soft ear cushion with a large printed L indicating the left side and a small plastic connector inside

Heavys H1H review: Extra directional speakers in the earcup.

Heavys claims the placement of the drivers is patented and specifically optimized for the way rock and metal are mixed, with an emphasis on guitar presence, drum impact, and the wide dynamic range those genres use.

The frequency range extends from 5 Hz to 46 kHz in wired mode, which is wider than most headphones at either end. Bluetooth operation narrows the upper limit to 24 kHz, which is still beyond the range of human hearing.

Let’s be clear, here. I am in the middle of the target market. I grew up on a steady diet of what is now called yacht rock, spent some time DJing at a rock station before my Navy stint when hair metal was popular, and just continued to listen.

These are the anti-Beats. They know what market they want, and shoot right at it.

And that Heavys claim about guitar and drums? Absolutely true.

Heavys H1H review: Noise cancellation and modes

The H1H uses what Heavys calls HellBlocker ANC, which it describes as a combination of passive noise cancellation and a mild active noise cancellation layer.

Passive noise cancellation (PNC) refers to the physical blocking of sound by the ear cup seal, while active noise cancellation (ANC) uses microphones and processing to cancel out remaining ambient noise electronically.

Hand holding a pair of large black electronic earmuffs or headphones with padded ear cups, visible buttons, ports, switches, and a branded logo on the side against a light background

Heavys H1H review: Multiple physical switches and dials are in play here.

The result is four operating modes: wired passive, Bluetooth passive, Bluetooth with ANC active, and Bluetooth with transparency mode on. Transparency mode uses the microphones to let outside sound in, which is useful for conversations or navigating in public.

The five-microphone setup handles calls via a two-mic end-fire array. End-fire configuration means the mics face outward in the direction of the mouth for better voice pickup and background noise rejection.

AirPods used to be better across the board at noise reduction. It’s not terrible, but it’s not as good as it was.

The Heavys H1H is just about as good as the AirPods Max is at sound reduction. I tested the feature in a moving car, in a noisy crowd before a concert, in a plane, and on a train.

The AirPods Max and Heavys H1H were about the same. The Heavys H1H seemed to be a bit better in the car, and the AirPods Max on the train and plane, but the differences are minute.

Heavys H1H review: Connectivity and app

Bluetooth 5.1 handles wireless connection, with support for SBC, AAC, and aptX Adaptive codecs. AAC is the relevant codec for iPhone users, as it is Apple’s preferred Bluetooth audio format and is used by AirPods and most Apple devices.

AptX Adaptive is a higher-quality codec for Android and compatible devices, offering lower latency and better dynamic bitrate management. iPhone users will be limited to AAC, which is still a good-quality option.

Black, semi-hard zippered case with a rounded, asymmetrical shape, featuring two raised padded sections on top, lying on a smooth, light-colored surface

Heavys H1H review: The case for the headphones

The companion app provides EQ customization and firmware updates. EQ access is a meaningful addition here, since the multi-driver tuning may benefit from adjustment depending on personal preference or the genre being played.

Having a built-in EQ in an app is nice. It’s so nice, in fact, that Apple is getting to it in iOS 27.

This is an incredibly personal experience. The app works pretty well, and it’s obvious to tell that there’s tuning going on in real-time as you move the sliders.

Heavys H1H review: Battery

Heavys claims up to 50 hours of battery life. That is a strong figure, comfortably above the 30-hour range that most competitors in this price bracket offer.

In my experience, I saw between 41 and 52 hours of battery life. There does not appear to be any noticeable idle drain.

Blue smart speaker next to a pair of black over-ear headphones resting on a white desk against a light-colored textured wall

Heavys H1H review: HomePod mini for scale.

This may be helped by an obvious on and off switch, that the AirPods Max do not have. You know when it’s off, and you have to guess with AirPods Max, for the most part.

I still don’t like that carrying case for the AirPods Max.

Heavys H1H review: A headphone with a very clear point of view

The H1H does not try to be for everyone. It is designed for a specific listener with a specific taste, and it is confident in that positioning.

The eight-driver system, Axel Grell’s involvement, and the genre-specific tuning are all genuine differentiators. There is no comparable product from the major headphone brands aimed this specifically at rock and metal fans.

Black over-ear headphones resting on a textured dark surface, featuring a circular dragon emblem and vertical decorative text on the outer ear cup

Heavys H1H review: You can buy covers with your favorite band on them for the earcups.

At $274, it sits in a competitive price range. Sony’s WH-1000XM5 and Apple’s AirPods Max are both options a buyer in this bracket might also consider. Neither of those is tuned for this audience, and neither offers the customization ecosystem that the shell system provides.

For Apple users, the AAC codec support and USB-C connection mean it will work well with iPhone and Mac. It is not an Apple product, but it fits into the Apple ecosystem without friction.

The multi-driver system delivers on the company’s promises, and the ANC is strong enough to hold up against the competition at this price.

What’s not to like?

Heavys H1H Pros

  • Eight-driver system designed for rock and metal
  • 50-hour claimed battery life
  • Interchangeable artist shells

Heavys H1H Cons

  • Heavier than most wireless competitors
  • iPhone users limited to AAC codec
  • Genre focus may not suit all listeners, but that’s the case with Beats too

Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy the Heavys H1H

The Heavys H1H are available from Heavys directly, with a 10% discount at press time bringing the price down to $269.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Ghost CMS flaw abused to push ClickFix attacks on hundreds of sites

Pierluigi Paganini
May 25, 2026

Threat actors are actively exploiting a security flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-26980, in Ghost CMS that was fixed months ago in real attacks against unpatched websites. According to Qianxin, the campaign has already affected more than 700 sites, including well-known organizations and universities.

The vulnerability is an SQL injection issue in Ghost’s Content API that can let an attacker read data from the database without logging in. In the worst case, this can expose the Admin API key, which can allow attackers to take over the site.

That key matters because it can be used to change published content. In this campaign, attackers used it to edit articles on compromised Ghost sites and insert malicious JavaScript at the end of pages. The goal was not just defacement, but to turn trusted websites into launch points for further malware delivery.

“After an in-depth investigation and analysis, we determined that this was not a targeted intrusion against the customer, but rather a large-scale poisoning campaign by an in-the-wild attack group targeting Ghost CMS. Although CVE-2026-26980 was publicly disclosed as early as February 19, a large number of users did not patch and upgrade in time, providing an opportunity for attackers.” reads the advisory published by Qianxin. “At least two groups are currently actively conducting such poisoning operations, and some sites have even become the target of competition between the two parties, with different malicious code being implanted one after another within a single day.”

The inserted code led visitors through a two-step chain. First, the page loaded a remote script that checked the browser and decided what the visitor should see. Then real victims were redirected to a fake verification page that looked like a normal “I’m human” check.

This is where the ClickFix part began. The page told users to press Windows+R, paste a command, and hit Enter. In practice, that command downloaded and started a malware payload on the victim’s machine. It was a classic social engineering trick: make the user do the dangerous part themselves.

Qianxin says the first signs of this activity appeared in early May. The malicious code found in the campaign had a compilation date of February 16, the same day Ghost announced the fix for CVE-2026-26980. That suggests the attackers moved quickly once they saw how many sites had not been updated.

The affected websites cover a wide range of sectors. Roughly half are personal blogs or independent sites, but the list also includes technology blogs, AI sites, media outlets, crypto projects, and educational institutions. Qianxin researchers say victims include sites linked to Harvard, Oxford, and DuckDuckGo.

The attack chain was also designed to be flexible. The loaders could fetch different payloads depending on the target, and the operators changed infrastructure several times.

“entire attack process has obvious five-stage characteristics of “CMS Takeover → Page Poisoning → Two-stage Loading → Social Engineering Lure (FakeCaptcha/ClickFix) → Malware Delivery”, and the entire process is highly automated: bulk vulnerability scanning → automatic key extraction → bulk injection → dynamic C2 distribution.” states the report.

In some cases, they switched domains after detection, keeping the campaign alive even when part of the chain was blocked.

“Through feature scanning of publicly accessible pages, we have cumulatively identified more than 700 poisoned victim domains, and have proactively contacted the sites for which contact information could be obtained, notifying them of the poisoning.” continues the report.

Qianxin also believes at least two different groups are involved. In some cases, the same site was hit more than once, with one attacker replacing the code left by another. That makes the campaign harder to clean up and shows how attractive compromised Ghost sites have become for abuse.

For site owners, the advice is straightforward. Ghost should be updated immediately, all credentials should be rotated, and site logs should be reviewed for suspicious admin API activity. Any injected scripts should be removed from the database itself, not just from the visual editor. Visitors who may have reached a poisoned site should also be warned.

The report includes Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) for the attacks observed by the researchers.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Ghost CMS)







Source link