I replaced Google Search with DuckDuckGo and Perplexity – my results were noticeably better


perplexhero

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Using specific tools for specific tasks is simply smarter.
  • Separate your searches and your AI queries for better results.
  • DuckDuckGo and Perplexity are my services of choice.

Had you asked me years ago what my search engine combo would be, I might have looked at you with a skeptical eye and asked, “What do you mean?” It was always assumed that Google was the go-to for finding things on the web. Right?

With the advent of AI, that’s all changed. Now, Google has essentially become a cesspool of AI-generated answers. That’s not to say it’s AI’s fault. AI has its place, and that’s not going to change.

Also: Why the most private way to browse the web isn’t incognito mode (but this instead)

But when I go to a search engine, I want actual search results, free from AI’s influence. And, if I want AI answers, I’m going to use an AI tool that doesn’t attempt to be a search engine. I want separate tools for those tasks because I find the results are exponentially better. You don’t want to go to a combo dentist-candy store for a root canal.

Back in 2025, I made Perplexity my default search engine, and it went pretty well. However, after a while, I realized I was missing out on actual search results. However, I wasn’t about to go back to Google. Oh no. I needed much more privacy than that search engine offered.

Fortunately, there’s DuckDuckGo, which I find to be one of the most private search engines available. DuckDuckGo is not just about privacy; it also lets you switch off AI results in your searches.

I know what you’re thinking: Having to switch between two search engines sounds like a real pain in the rear. In fact, it’s pretty easy.

Let me show you my method, so you can determine if it’s something you’d like to try.

Creating custom search engines

Most modern web browsers allow you to create custom search engines from existing sites. Not only that, but they also allow you to create shortcuts for them. (You could use duck for DuckDuckGo and plex for Perplexity, for example.) So, instead of having to go to each site, you’d only need to type the shortcut, hit Tab, and then type your search query. 

Also: Opera just gave me 5 compelling reasons to ditch Chrome and Safari for good

Or, you set DuckDuckGo as your default (which is what I do), and then create a custom search engine for Perplexity.

Since my default browser is Opera, I’m going to show you how to do it in Opera. The good news is that most browsers offer this feature, and it’s typically implemented the same way.

In Opera, go to Settings > Search engine > Manage search engines and site searches. On that page, scroll down to Site search and click Add. In the resulting pop-up, enter the following:

Click Add, and you’re done. 

Opera

Creating a new search engine is much easier than you think.

Screenshot by Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Once you’ve done that, make sure to switch your default search engine from Google to DuckDuckGo, which is done under the main Search engines section of Settings.

Opera

DuckDuckGo is my default search engine in every browser I use.

Screenshot by Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Using the search-AI combo

You most likely know how to use a typical search in your browser. Open a new tab, type your search query in the address bar, and hit Enter. The results will now be delivered via DuckDuckGo.

Also: What is Perplexity Deep Research, and how do you use it?

When you want to use Perplexity for your search, type the shortcut (plex), then (in Opera) follow it with your search string and hit Enter. In some browsers (such as Firefox), you type the shortcut, hit Enter, and then type your query.

This may not sound like an earth-shattering change, but once you start using these two different services for specific queries, you’ll find it to be exponentially better than simply going to Google because it’s what you’ve always done. With DuckDuckGo, you get much more privacy, and with Perplexity, you get an AI tool that doesn’t try to double-dip as a search engine. Specific tools for specific tasks: It’s the way to go!





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


I am a recent convert to physical media — yet even as someone getting back into buying discs in 2026, I haven’t been buying Blu-rays. Like many Americans, I still pick up DVDs instead. These aren’t great times for the Blu-ray format, and don’t expect a turnaround in 2026.

Fewer new releases make their way to Blu-ray

More media is now released exclusively for streaming

Blu-ray has been around for two decades, but it never managed to fully replace, or even overtake, the DVD format it was designed to supersede. We still can’t take for granted that our favorite movies, let alone TV shows, will eventually see a Blu-ray release.

The movies most likely to come to Blu-ray are the ones that hit theaters, but a growing amount of cinema is designed exclusively with streaming platforms in mind. I recently rewatched Mississippi Masala, which led me to check in on what work Sarita Choudhury has done over the decades since. A film called Evil Eye released in 2020 caught my eye. Unfortunately, it’s only available via Prime Video. There’s no Blu-ray or even a DVD. In contrast, it’s easy to watch Michael B. Jordan in Sinners on Blu-ray, since that movie came to theaters last year.

You could say that it makes sense that a movie with a 4.8/10 rating on IMDb doesn’t see a physical release, but in the heyday of physical video, store shelves were stacked not only with just the big-budget bangers but plenty of straight-to-DVD movies as well. Now those films exist to pad out streaming catalogs instead.

Fewer big box stores stock their shelves with physical discs

Blu-ray discs have disappeared from some stores entirely

Best Buy store front
Best Buy

The format’s demise is striking. I frequent my local Best Buy quite often and don’t see any movies on display. That’s because the retailer stopped selling movies in stores several years ago. Walmart still sells them, but the selection is a fraction of what you could find ten or twenty years ago. The audience has been reduced down to the shrinking number of people whose internet at home can’t handle streaming and those who might think of themselves as collectors.

If you venture onto Reddit and visit r/Blu-ray, you will find more threads about thrift store hauls and older collections than excitement over the latest new release. Don’t get me wrong — I, too, am very excited about seeing what gems I can snag for only a couple bucks, but this shows the challenge retailers face. Increasingly, only enthusiasts are prepared to drop over $20 on a disc.

I’m not buying discs to stick them in a player

Phone on a stand playing a Netflix video Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

The simple truth is that most people don’t want to buy physical media. Discs don’t fit in phones, and the drives are no longer available in most laptops. Even desktop PCs lack a place to put a disk. I recently built a PC for the first time in part to digitize my media library, and I rely on an external DVD drive connected via USB. Yes, DVD, not Blu-ray. A smaller file size combined with upscaling is easier on my hard drive.

Retro nostalgia hasn’t helped Blu-ray in the same way it has aided vinyl. This is in part because most people simply don’t care all that much about video quality. Most are streaming video on Netflix and YouTube at middling settings on small screens, and many of us are acclimated to mid-range phone speakers, compared to which even the subpar built-in speakers on modern TVs sound like a huge step-up. It’s hard to convince large numbers of people to purchase an expensive version of a movie in a format that requires thousands of dollars of home media equipment to truly appreciate.

4K Ultra HD is in an even worse position

It’s been a decade, yet few people own these discs

The 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray format is an enhancement, rather than a replacement, of the Blu-ray discs that first appeared in 2006. Debuting in 2016, the 4K Ultra HD format supports the max resolution of a 4K TV.

4K TVs were still somewhat of a novelty ten years ago, but they’re cheap and commonplace today. Still, people aren’t demanding 4K-quality Blu-ray movies as a result. These discs are still less common than 1080p ones, which are themselves still outnumbered by DVDs.

This isn’t merely a matter of consumers preferring the cheaper option. Often, 4K simply isn’t a choice, or it’s one that arrives significantly later, like the Switch port of a PC title. Some recent films, like Exit 8, are slated to see a physical release over the summer yet will still be in 1080p when they do. Adoption of the newest format has been that slow.

The industry isn’t helping itself, either. 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray discs come with DRM and aren’t easy to play on a modern PC, further limiting potential growth. They do not want anyone pirating these super high-quality versions. When you consider that some of these 4K Blu-rays have an AI upscaling problem, you’re paying more for what may not even be the best version.​​​​​​​


Blu-ray is seeing fewer releases, is available in fewer places, and is less accessible in the ways many of us want to watch TV shows and movies in 2026. With our portable devices getting better and internet speeds getting faster, it’s hard to see physical video staging a turnaround, even if we’re still a long way off from it going away entirely.



Source link