Nearfield Instruments raises record $380M chip round



Nearfield Instruments, a Rotterdam firm that inspects chips at the atomic scale, has raised $380mn at a $1.6bn valuation. It is the largest deep-tech round in Dutch history, and sovereign funds are paying close attention.

Everyone knows the headline names of the AI chip boom. Nvidia designs the chips. TSMC makes them. ASML builds the machines that print them.

Nearfield Instruments is not a household name. It just raised the biggest deep-tech round the Netherlands has ever seen.

The Rotterdam company closed a $380mn Series D at a $1.6bn valuation, according to Reuters. Demand outstripped supply.

What Nearfield actually does

Nearfield builds the tools that check chips once they leave the production line. Specifically, it makes atomic force microscopes.

These machines measure features only a few atoms tall. They do it by dragging a fine probe across the surface, a bit like a needle moving over a vinyl record.

Chipmakers take those measurements at hundreds of points along the production line. The field is called metrology, and it has become a chokepoint as chips grow more complex.

Nearfield’s QUADRA platform handles this without damaging the chip. It can image the deep trenches and stacked layers that optical and electron-beam tools struggle to resolve at volume.

Why sovereign money showed up

The size of the round matters. So does the guest list.

Fidelity led the deal. Singapore’s state fund Temasek joined too, alongside Walden Catalyst Ventures, Innovation Industries, M&G Investments and the Dutch state investor Invest-NL. The Qatar Investment Authority came in as a new backer.

Sovereign wealth funds rarely cluster around an early-stage company by accident. Their presence signals a bet on critical infrastructure, not just a promising startup.

One detail underlines the stakes. Walden Catalyst is the firm where Intel chief executive Lip-Bu Tan is a founding managing partner.

A country building a whole chip stack

Nearfield does not stand alone. It sits inside a fast-growing Dutch chip cluster.

The Netherlands already has ASML, whose lithography machines are central to global chipmaking. Around it, a wave of startups is attacking other layers of the stack.

Axelera AI is building low-power edge chips. ASML spinout Invisix uses soft X-rays to spot manufacturing errors. Together they look less like scattered bets and more like an industrial strategy.

Many trace back to TNO, the national research institute that spun out Nearfield in 2016. The pipeline from lab to company is one most of Europe struggles to copy.

The bottleneck AI created

The timing is no accident. As AI scaling demands ever more complex chips, the ability to measure them at the nanometre scale has turned into a bottleneck.

Nearfield’s tools support the cutting edge: High-NA EUV, gate-all-around transistors and 3D-stacked chips. Its bigger rivals, led by KLA, dominate the market today.

That market was worth about $10.3bn in 2025 and could reach $15bn by 2031, by one industry estimate. The company will spend the new money on production capacity, support centres and joint R&D with chipmakers.

The bottom line

Nearfield now employs around 450 people across Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, the US and Belgium. A year ago it raised $148mn. This round more than doubles that.

The open question is whether Dutch challengers can hold their lead against larger American and Asian incumbents. But a $380mn round, anchored by sovereign funds and aimed at a chip-inspection firm in Rotterdam, is not a coincidence. It is part of Europe’s wider push for semiconductor sovereignty.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link