Inside the world’s deepest and longest subsea road tunnel


It’s cold, it’s very, very noisy, and—if I can be quite honest with you—I’m not feeling super relaxed.

I’m currently around 300 meters, or 1,000 feet, beneath the North Sea, in a dark, dank cave. It smells weird. And I am increasingly aware of the pressure from millions of tons of seawater just above my head, pushing down with a force of more than 500 pounds per square inch. Picture a baby rhino standing on a postage stamp. 

Only fabulous engineering is keeping me from being crushed, drowned, disappeared. My safety goggles are foggy.

Just a few hundred meters away, someone is about to blow up a giant rock wall. Luckily, earlier that day I was given a full safety briefing, and I’ve got a special hard hat on. “Don’t worry—if you don’t make it, we’ll have your stuff sent back to your office,” geologist Anne-Merete Gilje tells me, straight-faced. Ah, Norwegian humor.

“It’s kind of a lifestyle. You have to be a little bit crazy to work underground all the time.”

Niclas Brusehed, tunnel foreman, Implenia

I’m in this odd situation under the iconic fjords of Norway to visit what will soon become the world’s longest and deepest subsea road tunnel, called Rogfast (short for “Rogaland Fixed Link”). I want to understand how you make something as audacious as a 26.7-kilometer (16.6-mile) highway that sits 390 meters (1,280 feet) below the sea at its deepest point. And also—at a time when it can feel hard to get anything done, especially in the US—to reassure myself that ambitious engineering is still possible. That we can still make things. 

The Norwegians already have the world’s longest subsea tunnel, the 14.4-kilometer Ryfylke, though Rogfast will dwarf it. Their expertise has attracted attention from Japan, Spain, Morocco, and even a number of US states, whose representatives were due to visit the site in May, just weeks after I went. They, too, want to know how Norway does it. 

The answer: tons of explosives. 

The entire endeavor feels like an obstinate refusal to give in to physics and geology. “It’s always exciting,” Niclas Brusehed, a tunnel foreman at Implenia, a Swiss firm involved in the project, tells me. “Every blast creates a new world.” There’s not just the blasting of the tunnel itself—although that is an epic project on its own—but an immense logistics challenge involving huge ventilation shafts, extreme pressure, underground roundabouts, and the complex Norwegian geology. Oh, and the water. So much water.  

“This is the longest continuous blast on the sea,” says John Olaf Østerhus, assistant project manager at Implenia. “Never been done before. We can’t buy a book to see how we do this.” 

All right, time to fish my phone out of my safety suit—don’t want to forget this.

On another planet

Arriving at the rock face where the tunnel hits seabed feels like being on the moon. It’s a huge slab of stone at the end of a long, dark, wet, wide passageway that’s lit (barely) by electric lights. Giant vehicles carting tons of rocks rumble past periodically, and we pull to the side of the road to let them by. 

""
Rescue chambers are spread throughout the tunnel network.
COURTESY OF NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION

Workers clock in for 12-hour shifts, 6 a.m. until 6 p.m., deep in the bowels of the Earth where no natural light can reach. Twelve days on, 16 days off. They eat their lunch at a table in this damp cave surrounded by portacabins plastered with safety notices. “It’s kind of a lifestyle,” says Brusehed, laughing. “You have to be a little bit crazy to work underground all the time.”

These crazy engineers are here to make tunnels the Norwegian way. The nation frequently uses what’s known as the drill-and-blast method instead of the tunnel-boring machines that are more typical elsewhere. This approach offers more flexibility for long, complex operations with varied rock types. Each blast adds about five to six meters to the tunnel. 

Rogfast is being built inward from the ends to speed things up. The construction company Skanska is leading from the north, coming from the island of Vestre Bokn; Implenia has joined a company called Stangeland to tunnel from Randaberg in the south, which is where I am. Both teams use multiple laser scans each day to consistently measure their orientation and check that the tunnel is exactly where it should be. The two ends should meet sometime in 2029, with no more than just a few centimeters of deviation.

""
The caves are like towering cathedrals, scattered with rubble.
COURTESY OF NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION

Norway has constructed more than a thousand kilometers of tunnels over the past several decades. The depth and length of these make the best efforts to date of Elon Musk’s Boring Company—a mere 2.7-kilometer tunnel in Las Vegas that is just 3.6 meters wide—look rather pathetic. The country’s spectacular setting makes such builds necessary; while Norwegians are proud of having the second-longest coastline in the world after Canada, getting up and down the west coast requires multiple ferry rides between islands, which can move extra slowly when the weather’s bad. 

After it’s completed, which is scheduled to happen in 2033, Rogfast should help eliminate two ferry routes and cut the five-hour journey between the southwestern cities of Stavanger and Bergen by 40 minutes. It will funnel four lanes of traffic deep beneath the fjords of Boknafjord and Kvitsøyfjord, and at one section a relatively scant 50 meters of rock will separate the drivers speeding through the tunnel from the bottom of the North Sea. There are also, delightfully, two undersea roundabouts located 220 meters below sea level.

But the first job is to contend with all that water.

The never-ending battle

Subsea tunneling is defined by a constant, ultimately unwinnable battle with the ocean. The sheer weight of the sea above you, and the crushing pressure, means the water will always find a way in. “It’s the volume and the pressure that’s the biggest risk,” says Ole Magne Rønning, project leader for Implenia/Stangeland.

So before tunnel engineers blow stuff up, they need to check for leaks. Into the rock face ahead of them, they drill a number of narrow holes that go 25 to 30 meters deep to see how much water comes through. Even a small probe can unleash a torrent within seconds, says Rønning. When road traffic eventually rumbles through these tubes, water will still trickle from the rocks; it will be redirected into mini reservoirs dotted throughout the tunnel network before being pumped back out. 

Since stopping the water entirely is impossible, the game is instead to push it away as best you can. If the leakage in front of the rock face exceeds a certain limit—around four liters per hole per minute—then the next stage is “grouting”: pumping a mixture of cement-like sludge into new holes that fan out in the ceiling above and around the face. Ideally, you address the leaks that are ahead of you; “it’s a lot more difficult to stop a leak that’s behind you,” says Rønning.

At one point deep below the sea, I chat with Tarald Johan Nomeland, the project’s grouting specialist. He’s big and bearded, perhaps one of the most Norwegian-looking men I’ve ever met. He stands, towering above me, and shakes my hand in his giant bear-like paw. Grouting is in Nomeland’s family; his dad did it too. He loves it. “There’s not necessarily just one solution to a problem,” he says, eyes flashing with delight as he describes fighting the interminable battle with the water. “There may be many solutions.” 

The amount of grouting needed determines how fast the project can move. On the Skanska side, for example, some weeks the face moves 30 meters; others, as few as 10. 

This isn’t made any easier by the rock itself. The seabed around Norway was shaped by glaciers during the Ice Age. As the ice retreated, it dragged softer rock with it, carving out the fjords for which the nation is so famous. But this legacy makes digging subsea tunnels particularly gnarly. Much of what’s left is the hard, difficult-­to-break stuff. 

And it’s not just one type of rock, either. There are “big wide areas where we don’t know what’s down there,” says Gilje, the geologist who is a project manager for the Norwegian Public Roads Administration, which is in charge of the entire project. Before any construction started, boats took core samples from the seabed along the planned tunnel route. Seismic surveys from the ocean surface—like those that look for oil in the region—helped fill in the gaps.



Each kind of rock presents its own challenges, so the engineers “have different techniques for different problems,” Gilje explains. For example, they found that one southern section contains a lot of phyllite. Phyllite is considered “nice” to work with. It is formed from a combination of shale, siltstone, and mud over time and is pretty compact, with few cracks to let water through. Its compact nature means it requires more explosives per blast, however. It also contains a lot of quartz, which is toxic when released into the air during blasting. So workers wear monitors to measure their exposure, and a curtain of water sprayed in front of the rock face helps prevent too much from drifting into the tunnel. 

The northernmost part of the route, meanwhile, is made mostly of solid granite and a similar rock called gneiss. Both are hard but contain fractures that allow the seawater to trickle through.

The rock type can also change over just a short distance. So during the dig, every 80 meters or so, an engineer sends sound waves through the face to expose its secrets and help evaluate its structural integrity. The rock is graded on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the worst and least stable. “When you are reaching class 5, then it’s almost like soil. It’s not rock anymore,” says Rønning. 

This investigation informs the kinds of structural supports each section will need—from steel rods that fan out above the rock face like an umbrella, for the strongest rock, to reinforced-concrete arches that hold up the weakest. To seal everything off, the team sprays a substance called “shotcrete,” liquid concrete mixed with reinforced-steel fibers, onto the walls throughout. A plastic membrane and concrete panels are fitted later.

“It’s going to be a very safe tunnel,” Gilje says. “It’s going to last for 100 years.”

Strange dangers

While I may not be brave, at least I don’t get seasick. Back at the surface, I board a small ferry that putters and sloshes its way from the mainland to Kvitsøy, a sparsely populated municipality made up of 365 separate islands and islets—something its 550 or so inhabitants are very proud of, even though most of these islands are uninhabited chunks of rock. 

For the next few years, Kvitsøy’s population will experience a tiny boom as its largest island hosts a semipermanent encampment of contractors and engineers working on what is probably the most complex part of the Rogfast project: the giant ventilation shafts that will sit roughly halfway along the tunnel’s length to bring fresh air into the entire network, and remove the stale air in turn. 

It’s also one of the reasons why road tunnels are much more complex than rail tunnels. Cars pump out fumes that have to be vented away. During construction, fresh air flows in via huge plastic tubes suspended from the ceiling, but eventually, Rogfast’s air will come in through two nine-meter-wide shafts that will bore down from Kvitsøy’s surface: one to bring it in, one to take it out. 

Hundreds of steel rods are fitted to support the ceiling and walls.
COURTESY OF NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION

Creating these shafts is a wild process. First, narrow boreholes are drilled from the ground down into the tunnel 210 meters below the surface. A vertical drill rig is then pulled up through the hole from the bottom, widening the shaft to 2.4 meters as it ascends. 

Then explosives are set off on the island’s surface, bashing down through the rock to widen the shaft. A large digger pushes the resulting debris down the narrower, not-yet-exploded length of shaft below, sending rocks barreling toward the tunnel at the bottom like socks tumbling down a laundry chute. Trucks haul away the fallen rocks. This process happens in stages, repeating at regular intervals, opening up the passage a bit deeper with each pass. Once it’s all done, steel rods are installed in the shaft’s walls to keep it secure. 

Down below, I stand beneath one of the narrow guide holes for one of the two ventilation shafts. The ceiling soars overhead—a strangely beautiful cathedral, cragged and shadowed by lamplight.

Besides poisonous air, the epic nature of these engineering projects throws up other surprising dangers. For example, Rogfast will take about 30 minutes to drive through. It doesn’t seem that long, but the project’s designers worry that the monotonous environment may lull some drivers to sleep. 

Engineers faced this problem with Ryfylke—which, as the current longest subsea road tunnel, has been a testing ground for its bigger sibling. It relieves the tedium with a large hall that opens up in the middle of the tunnel, lit by colored lights that change each day. When Rogfast is finished, artists will be invited to do something similar, using lights, colors, and shapes to keep drivers alert.

Then there are the environmental risks. What is there to do with all the loose rock created by the blasts? The engineers predict 8.5 million cubic meters’ worth. That’s enough to fill more than 2,500 Olympic-sized swimming pools. The solution is to bring it back to the surface, where it can be used to create new land. To do this, the project employs a giant barge designed to split open and dump 350 tons of rock in one go. 

But adding more rock particles to the water can make it hard for fish to breathe, says Elizabeth Austdal Paulen, Implenia’s environment lead on the project and my fellow passenger on the windy (and soon to be redundant) ferry over to Kvitsøy. Her team monitors their levels in real time: If the particulate count is too high, the drops must pause until the new rock has settled on the seabed. The goal is to protect lobster fishing, a vital part of the local economy, and to safeguard the breeding time for cod, which was an issue when I visited.  

Finally, of course, on top of all this are the many hazards for the people who are actually doing all this blasting and digging and hauling. Or, say, for the visitors who are finding their inner nine-year-old getting a little too giddy about what’s next.

Time to blow

Before I’m allowed underground, I must sit through a short safety briefing, where I learn there are multiple hazards when you’re that deep. Fires, for instance, can break out, exacerbated by the way the salt water affects electronics. Just a week earlier, a car caught fire somewhere deep within the network. “You have to be aware all the time,” says Anne Brit Moen, the project lead for Skanska. “It’s a very harsh, harsh climate.”

After the session, I’m given a hi-viz suit, the hard hat (which has built-in ear protectors), gloves, safety glasses, and reinforced boots. I get instructions on how to operate the oxygen mask that will be in the car with me, and a device to put in my pocket that will track my exact location on screens in the control room. The device also acts as a personal warning system: If it vibrates and a blue light appears, then a blast is imminent and I must get to safety; if it vibrates and glows red, umm, well, that’s bad news and it’s time to evacuate. 

“If you’re the first to the rescue chamber, press the green button … close the hatch and sit down and be calm.”

Ketil Myklebost, project manager, Implenia

But let’s say I can’t—I’m too deep underground. Then there is a second, less fun option. I’m given instructions on how to access the rescue chambers. These metal boxes—about the size of a large van—can squeeze in around 16 people, and each contains chocolate, water, radio equipment, a defibrillator, and enough oxygen for 24 hours. I see them dotted throughout the tunnels as we drive through. Worst-case scenario, I’m supposed to get to the nearest one, sit tight, and hope to get rescued. 

“If you’re the first to the rescue chamber, press the green button for 15 seconds to release pressure,” says Ketil Myklebost, a project manager at Implenia. “And then close the hatch and sit down and be calm.”

Calm, right. Okay.

In the hours before my visit, a huge drilling “jumbo” rig puts as many as 180 holes deep into the rock face. The number, angle, depth, and spacing of the holes is calculated in advance using software but finalized at the face—here, they’re almost six meters deep. At one point, I clamber up into the jumbo and inspect the pattern on its screen, matching it against what I can see on the huge rock face, which stands more than 12 meters tall and wide.

The holes have been stuffed with an explosive slurry. (Someone quips that if I get any on my clothes, I’ll be stopped at the airport as a terrorist. A Norwegian joke, again.) As I watch, workers in a kind of cherry picker fit each hole with a detonator and make sure they’re all connected to one another by wire, ready to be triggered remotely. 

Then my personal safety device starts vibrating. When I take it out of my pocket, it’s blinking blue. Showtime. 

How far back do I need to be? “It’s dangerous in this direction 500 to 600 meters, but if you’re around the corner you can be closer,” says Sveinung Brude, project manager for the Norwegian Public Roads Administration. 

""
Workers lay asphalt.
COURTESY OF NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION

I stand by the worker who will trigger the blast from what looks like a small briefcase with an antenna. Then he presses the button. 

The shock wave hits me before I hear it. My chest vibrates. In the first few milliseconds, a propulsive thump briefly stuns my senses, followed immediately by a rolling, crumpled thunder. 

Just a moment later—almost instantly, really—wind billows through the cavern. Rocks clatter as they crash off the walls. I try not to show any panic. (That was meant to sound like that, right?) A hush falls, and there’s just the tinkling of stones as they bounce and skip amid the rubble.

Dust rises into the air, and there is a strange smell.

Through my ear protection it sounds like the end of the world.  

Niall gets to grips with what it’s like to work under the sea.
NORWEGIAN PUBLIC ROADS ADMINISTRATION

The explosion itself is a beautiful choreography: Blasts are initiated one after another, starting from the center. In video footage, you can just about hear the sequential pitter-patter of the charges as they go off. (In person, it’s a bit more all-at-once and overwhelming.)

Rogfast has just crept another few meters closer to completion. 

I find myself grinning. Maybe there’s something extremely primal about being near an explosion? I’m not sure. I look down at my hand, where I have my phone out, recording the intensity of the moment.

Except … I wasn’t recording. The stupid rubber safety gloves I’m wearing must have stopped the command from going through.

Oh no. Oh no.

A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and I, uh, blew it. “I WASN’T RECORDING!” I shriek. 

“It’s better that way,” says Rønning, walking off into the gloom. “You’ll remember it.” How very Norwegian. 



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


There aren’t many modern sports cars that manage to feel like a genuine loophole in the system, but this one does. It blends two very different engineering worlds into a single package, and somehow it just works.

It’s quick too, with a 3.9-second sprint to 60 mph and an inline-six that’s already earned a reputation as one of the best in modern performance cars. On top of that, it benefits from one of the widest dealer networks you’ll find outside the domestic brands, which takes a lot of the usual ownership stress out of the equation.

The strange part is how few people seem to have fully clocked what this combination actually means. It feels like one of those setups that won’t be around in this form much longer, even if it probably should be.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from BMW, Porsche, and Toyota, as well as other authoritative sources including TopSpeed.


Rear 3/4 shot of a 2025 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing


The 205 MPH American super sedan that embarrasses sports cars

This monstrous machine leaves sports cars in its dust.

One of the best modern sports cars is quietly on its way out

A rare performance bargain mixing BMW power with Toyota reliability is ending soon

Red 2026 Mazda MX-5 Miata on a coastal highway Credit: Mazda

This sports coupe has been around since 2019, but it’s now heading toward the end of the road. When it’s gone, it’ll leave behind one of those weird, unlikely combinations that probably won’t happen again.

It only exists because a few things lined up at exactly the right time, from partnerships to platform sharing. Once that window closes, it’s hard to see it opening again in quite the same way.

The end isn’t coming—it’s already here

Rear 3/4 shot of a 2024 Nissan Z Credit: Nissan

In an official statement, the company confirmed production wrapped in March 2026. You can still spec one on the website, but no new cars are coming off the line.

The news didn’t exactly set the auto world on fire, but the impact runs deeper than the headlines suggested. There’s no successor planned, and last time it took two decades for the nameplate to return.

For now, what’s left is a Final Edition model and the slow realization that this chapter is already closed.

A partnership that won’t happen twice

Static side profile shot of a gray 2025 Porsche 911 Carrera. Credit: NetCarShow.com

This sports car comes from a platform shared by two automakers that couldn’t be more different if they tried. It wears a Japanese badge, has a German twin, and is built in Graz, Austria.

Without that partnership, it probably never would’ve made it to production in the first place. Now that its German sibling has also bowed out, the deal that made both cars possible has officially run its course.

Static side profile shot of an orange 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06. Credit: NetCarShow.com

For this kind of two-door performance car to exist again, the brand would need either a fresh partnership or a completely new platform. The catch is it hasn’t built its own performance inline-six in over 20 years.

Sure, it has the resources to develop one from scratch, but the business case just doesn’t really add up anymore. This sports coupe only happened because the timing and circumstances lined up perfectly — and that window now looks firmly closed.


Front 3/4 action shot of a 2021 Acura TLX Type S


10 Family Friendly Sedans That Drive Like Sports Cars

These family sedans offer sporty handling, strong acceleration, and everyday practicality, making them perfect for driving enthusiasts with families.

The Supra’s BMW DNA is exactly what made it work

What started as controversy ended up being its biggest strength

If you still haven’t guessed it, we’re talking about the Toyota GR Supra. When the MkV first dropped, a lot of the JDM crowd wasn’t exactly impressed—the BMW engine swap caused a full-on backlash.

But looking back now that it’s gone, that whole controversy hits differently. What people once saw as a betrayal is actually a big part of what made this car so interesting in the first place.

The B58 came at exactly the right time

2025 Toyota GR Supra detail shot of engine bay Credit: Toyota

Toyota had been working on the next-generation Supra for nearly a decade before the name finally came back in 2019. One of the biggest challenges was figuring out the right engine—something that wouldn’t be shared across the rest of the lineup.

Even with all its R&D resources, building a brand-new inline-six just for the Supra didn’t really make sense financially or practically. It was one of those cases where doing it alone just wasn’t realistic.

By 2019, BMW’s 3.0-liter B58 inline-six had already built a reputation as one of the best performance engines for the money. It stood out for its smoothness, responsiveness, and surprising durability—all traits that lined up perfectly with what Toyota wanted for the Supra.

Timing-wise, it couldn’t have worked out better for Toyota, which saw the engine’s potential right away. In the GR Supra, the B58 puts out 382 horsepower and 368 lb-ft of torque through an eight-speed automatic, good for a 0–60 mph run in about 3.9 seconds, with independent tests dipping closer to 3.7 seconds.

The Gazoo Racing effect

2026 Toyota GR Supra Final Edition GR lettering Credit: Toyota

There’s a common misconception that the GR Supra is just a rebadged BMW Z4, but that’s not really the case. The platform underneath both cars was a joint effort from the start, not a one-way handover.

Toyota’s chief engineer, Tetsuya Tada, pushed for a co-developed setup that fit the vision for a modern sports coupe. Drive a Z4 and a Supra back to back and the difference shows pretty quickly—the Supra feels sharper and more performance-focused, while the Z4 leans more into relaxed grand touring.


Front 3/4 shot of a 2025 BMW M240i


The 2026 BMW M240i Proves You Don’t Need an M2 to Have Fun

The 2026 BMW M240i delivers thrilling performance, sharp handling, and everyday comfort—all without the M2’s hefty price tag.

The GR Supra became a modern enthusiast favorite

A balanced sports car that nails performance, usability, and value

Rear closeup View of a 2025 Toyota GR Supra Credit: Toyota

Beyond all the early controversy, the GR Supra has quietly proven itself as a seriously well-rounded modern sports car. When you strip away the noise, it holds up exactly where it matters most.

It’s quick, easy to live with day to day, and doesn’t come with the usual headaches you’d expect from something this performance-focused. In terms of performance, usability, and long-term ownership confidence, it doesn’t just tick boxes—it actually delivers in all of them.

Performance meets everyday usability

2025 Toyota GR Supra detail shot of manual transmission shift lever Credit: Toyota

The performance you get from the $59,595 2026 Toyota GR Supra 3.0 is honestly hard to ignore. It’ll do 0–60 mph in about 3.7 to 3.9 seconds straight from the factory, which puts it right in the mix with cars like the $86,600 BMW M4 Competition Coupe.

But the Supra isn’t just about straight-line speed. You’re also getting proper hardware like Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires, adaptive suspension, Brembo brakes, and an active limited-slip diff, all working together to make it feel far more capable than its price suggests.

What’s surprising is how easy it is to live with day to day. There’s usable cargo space, comfortable stock seats, and enough refinement that it doesn’t feel out of place as a daily driver. It can genuinely do track days and the weekday commute without much compromise, which is exactly why it stands out in this segment.

Long-term ownership confidence

2025 Toyota GR Supra Trio Front White Red Black Driving on Track Credit: Toyota

The BMW B58 used to be the GR Supra’s biggest talking point for all the wrong reasons, but over time it’s turned into one of its strongest assets. It’s built well beyond its stock output and has a long track record of handling serious tuning without breaking a sweat.

Thanks to its closed-deck design and the durability upgrades over older N5x inline-sixes, it has a lot more headroom than most engines in this class. These days, 600+ horsepower B58 builds are pretty common in the tuning world, but that level of strength and reliability used to be almost unheard of in a setup like this.

The GR Supra gets even more compelling when you factor in Toyota’s massive dealer network — the largest of any non-domestic brand in the U.S. It’s roughly 3.5 times bigger than BMW’s, with Toyota dealerships in just about every major town across all 50 states.

2020–2025 Toyota GR Supra interior Credit: Toyota

In California alone, Toyota has 136 locations compared with BMW’s 52, which makes servicing and support noticeably easier. That kind of coverage adds real-world convenience that goes beyond just the car itself.

On top of that, the Supra comes with a 5-year/60,000-mile warranty versus the BMW Z4’s 4-year/50,000-mile coverage. That effectively gives you an extra year of protection just for choosing Toyota, which is a pretty solid bonus.

It’s German engineering backed by Japanese peace of mind, and that combination is hard to beat.


Full view of a black Audi RS5 Sportback parked on tarmac with mountains in the background.


These Cars Have Supercar-Like Performance At A Fraction Of The Cost

Supercars may be fun to drive, but they cost a fortune. Here are 10 cars with similar performance, which cost a lot less.

The GR Supra may be the last of its kind

A rare performance formula that’s getting harder to find

2025 Toyota GR Supra close-up shot of taillight Credit: Toyota

The GR Supra’s discontinuation isn’t just the end of a model—it feels like the end of an era for this kind of sports car. We’re drifting further away from a market that prioritizes pure performance engineering, and cars like this are becoming harder to justify.

That means a rear-wheel-drive six-cylinder sports coupe at this price point might not come around again for a long time, if ever.

The enthusiast market is slowly disappearing

Static rear 3/4 shot of the 2026 BMW Z4 Final Edition. Credit: BMW

At $58,300, the 2026 GR Supra 3.0 base trim is definitely not what you’d call cheap. It’s one of Toyota’s more premium and unique offerings, but it still manages to punch above its weight in terms of value.

Compared with its twin, the 2026 BMW Z4 M40i, which starts at $68,400, the Supra comes in noticeably cheaper for basically the same core hardware. Even the 2026 BMW M2 Coupe at $69,000 undercuts it in price but still trails slightly in 0–60 mph performance versus the base Supra.

If you wanted to go Porsche instead, the 718 Cayman unfortunately isn’t part of the picture anymore. Even if it were, you’d be looking at something like a $200,000 718 Cayman GT4 RS to match or beat the Supra’s performance.

The 2026 Toyota GR86 Premium is a great sports car in its own right, but it delivers a very different, more lightweight experience compared to the Supra. At the end of the day, the GR Supra really stood alone as the only car that blended BMW M-level performance with a Toyota price tag.

What comes next won’t be better

Static sid eprofile shot of a gray Toyota GR GT. Credit: Toyota

It’s hard not to feel a bit pessimistic about where things are heading for driving enthusiasts. As everyday cars keep getting more expensive and priorities shift toward emissions and practicality, traditional sports cars are being pushed further out of reach.

The entry barrier just keeps climbing, and a lot of people who would’ve once been into cars are drifting toward other, more affordable interests instead. If the GR Supra’s successor ends up being a hybrid or EV, it’ll likely feel more filtered, more expensive, and less raw than what came before.

The Supra really nailed a rare formula—BMW-level performance with Toyota reliability—and there’s a real chance we won’t see that combination done quite as well again.



Source link