You’re using your NAS wrong if you aren’t separating your data


At this point, I have several NAS servers around my house. The best thing I ever did, though, wasn’t setting up five NAS servers. It was separating the important data from replaceable data. That is when running a NAS finally clicked with me, and I wish I had done it a long time ago.

My homelab used to have just one NAS for everything

If that NAS was down, everything was down

A Lenovo RD440 rack-mount server mounted to a 27U rack in a homelab. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

Like many homelabbers, my homelab started out fairly small. Originally, I had a 4-bay Synology NAS, and eventually replaced that with a 12-bay retired enterprise server. In both scenarios, I only had one storage server up and running at one time.

For a while, that was fine. My NAS (network attached storage server) really didn’t do much more than house my Plex media. However, over time, I started to want to store more and more data on the NAS, and found myself hesitant because I didn’t have a real backup solution.

Not only that, but I also didn’t want to deal with the downtime potential that was there. I love my enterprise server, but it required a ton of maintenance up front when I first got started with everything.

Because of this, every time my server was down, my storage was down. This is fine if the storage is just used for incidental files, like movies and TV shows, but it’s not acceptable if it’s production files like photos or videos actively being worked on.

So, I basically only kept archival files on the NAS. Active projects never went to the NAS because it wasn’t ready for it. That all changed once I got a second NAS.

Once I got a second NAS, I started separating my data

Important files go on one, and easy to obtain files go on the other

Once I had two NAS systems in my homelab, I actually started using them in the way they were intended. Originally, while I wanted my NAS to be a place to store files, it became a place to store only my movies and TV shows.

When I got my second one, I actually started to be able to use it and rely on it. My original Lenovo RD440 rack-mount server kept its initial use: storing media server files. I migrated everything else off of the RD440 to my second NAS and it was such a better experience.

Now, I have several NAS systems in my homelab, but each one plays a very important role. Some NAS servers only store replaceable data—things I can re-download in a few moments. I have one NAS whose sole purpose is keeping a local backup of my Google Drive in case anything ever happens to my Google account—that’s easy to replace (unless Google cans the account).

Other NAS servers are where my important data live. I have my photography archives going back over a decade stored on one of my NAS servers. That’s irreplaceable to me. I could never get those photos back again, so it has to be on a NAS with new drives, plenty of redundancy, and cloud backup.

It’s just really nice to know which NAS can be shut down without worry and which I need to be worried about uptime with. Separating the NAS servers gave me a peace I didn’t know I was missing.

I can now back the systems up to each other for added redundancy

RAID isn’t a backup

Synology DS225 Plus 2-bay NAS with a Synology HAT3300-4T drive sliding into the front bay. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

One more thing that played into me having more confidence in the NAS systems was the ability to back up to each other. Whereas before, I only had one NAS server, so I could only have one copy on the server and one in the cloud, now I can have multiple.

Important information I can have stored on my primary NAS and then automatically have it back up to another NAS every night. This gives me two local copies, plus the remote copy I have when it backs up to the cloud.

Some might say that my backup strategy is overkill—having multiple network attached storage servers at home plus cloud backup. But, there’s just some information that I simply don’t want to risk losing, and this is the best way I’ve found to avoid that.

  • Synology DS225+ Network Attached Storage server.

    Brand

    Synology

    CPU

    Intel Celeron J4125

    Memory

    2GB

    Drive Bays

    2

    Expansion

    None

    Ports

    2x USB 3.2 Gen 1

    The Synology DS225+ is a great beginner storage server. It features two 3.5-inch hard drive bays and both 2.5Gb Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet. Designed around Synology’s Disk Station Manager operating system, this NAS offers a simplified experience that anyone will feel at home using. 


  • UGREEN NASync DSP2800 thumbnail

    Brand

    UGREEN

    CPU

    Intel 12th Gen N-Series

    Memory

    8GB (Upgradeable to 16GB)

    Drive Bays

    2 x 22TB

    Ports

    2.5GbE, USB-C, USB-A (x3)

    Caching

    Expandable up to 8TB

    This cutting-edge network-attached storage device transforms how you store and access data via smartphones, laptops, tablets, and TVs anywhere with network access.


  • UGREEN NAS DXP4800 Plus 4-Bay Desktop NASync.

    CPU

    Intel Pentium Gold 8505 5-Core

    Memory

    8GB DDR5

    Drive Bays

    4

    Dimensions

    10.14″D x 7.01″W x 7.01″H

    Weight

    3.79 Kilograms

    With 4 bays available to add up to 136TB of storage, the UGREEN NAS DXP4800 can store all of your data safely and securely.



Sometimes, redundancy is the best solution

While I don’t have mirrored NAS servers like some out there, I think that my setup is perfect for me. I’m able to keep the important documents on a newer NAS that has newer drives in it, and then the replaceable files live on the older system with refurbished drives.

I don’t expect the old system to die at all, but it just gives that extra peace of mind that I needed before diving into using a NAS the way I now do.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Global law enforcement operation takes First VPN offline

Pierluigi Paganini
May 21, 2026

Police seized First VPN in a global crackdown, exposed its cybercrime users, and shut down infrastructure tied to ransomware and data theft.

A major international law enforcement operation has taken First VPN offline, a service that had become a quiet staple for ransomware crews, data thieves, and other cybercriminals trying to hide in plain sight.

“The coordinated action took place between 19 and 20 May and targeted the infrastructure behind one of the most widely used VPN services in the cybercrime underground.” reads the press release published by Europol. “The gathered intelligence exposed thousands of users linked to the cybercrime ecosystem and generated operational leads connected to ransomware attacks, fraud schemes, and other serious offences worldwide.”

Authorities seized dozens of servers across 27 countries, arrested the administrator, and carried out a search in Ukraine, cutting off an infrastructure that had been used in a wide range of serious investigations.

The service marketed itself as a privacy-first VPN with no logging and no cooperation with law enforcement, which made it appealing not just to ordinary users but also to threat actors looking to mask their activity. That’s the uncomfortable part of the VPN story: the same tools that help people protect privacy on public Wi-Fi or work securely from home are also useful for criminals who want to conceal their origin, route traffic through different regions, and make attribution harder.

“For years, the service, known as ‘First VPN’, was promoted on Russian-speaking cybercrime forums as a trusted tool for remaining beyond the reach of law enforcement. It offered users anonymous payments, hidden infrastructure, and services designed specifically for criminal use.” continues the press release. “‘First VPN’ had become deeply embedded in the cybercrime ecosystem, appearing in almost every major cybercrime investigation supported by Europol in recent years. Criminals used it to conceal their identities and infrastructure while carrying out ransomware attacks, large-scale fraud, data theft, and other serious offences.”

Europol said the service name kept resurfacing in major cybercrime cases, and Eurojust confirmed that investigators had been building the case for years through a joint effort led by French and Dutch authorities. 

What seems to have made this case especially valuable for investigators is that they didn’t just shut the service down, they also got inside its infrastructure before it disappeared. That likely gave them access to user records, connection data, and other evidence that can be used to map criminal activity back to real people and devices.

Authorities dismantled cybercrime infrastructure, including 33 servers and a service based in Ukraine, and seized domains linked to the operation: 1vpns.com, 1vpns.net, 1vpns.org, plus associated onion sites. They also notified users directly and shared information on hundreds of accounts with international partners, which suggests this may lead to follow-on investigations well beyond the VPN itself.

The bigger lesson is simple: privacy tools are not the problem, but criminal operators often rely on the same infrastructure normal users trust. Once that infrastructure is compromised, dismantled, or logged, the illusion of anonymity can disappear very quickly.

“The operation has already generated significant operational results at Europol’s level:

  • 21 Europol-supported investigations advanced through the intelligence obtained.”
  • 83 intelligence packages disseminated;
  • information linked to 506 users shared internationally;

“For years, cybercriminals saw this VPN service as a gateway to anonymity. They believed it would keep them beyond the reach of law enforcement. This operation proves them wrong. Taking it offline removes a critical layer of protection that criminals depended on to operate, communicate and evade law enforcement.” said Edvardas Šileris, Head of Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, First VPN)







Source link