Meloni says social media bans for kids are easily dodged



Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Wednesday that her government would not take the initiative to introduce a social media ban for teens, breaking from the approach taken by Britain and France. “I am not against a social media ban for under-16s, but I am not either convinced that this proposal alone can solve the problem because that type of ban can be easily circumvented,” she told reporters at the end of the G7 summit in Évian-les-Bains.

The comments position Italy as the most prominent holdout among major European governments on age-based bans, which have become the default policy response to growing concerns about children’s mental health and online safety.

Platforms, not parents

Meloni argued that bans risk “partially transfer the problem on families” and that restrictions are ineffective unless governments put more pressure on platforms to “take their responsibilities.” The framing shifts the debate from policing children’s access to demanding structural changes from the companies that profit from engagement.

While insisting she was not opposed to an under-16 ban in principle, Meloni said her government has decided not to present a decree or bill, instead letting lawmakers in parliament lead the discussion. Several Italian parties have introduced bills to restrict minors’ access to social media, but none has been adopted.

The European rush to restrict

Earlier this week, Britain announced it would ban under-16s from social media, a measure Prime Minister Keir Starmer hopes to legislate before Christmas and implement in early 2027. The restrictions are expected to extend beyond traditional platforms into gaming apps and AI chatbots, the broadest scope yet proposed by a major democracy.

France will implement its own ban for under-15s later this year, with enforcement beginning in September. Canada has also moved to restrict under-16s, with its Digital Safety Act covering social media and AI chatbots alike.

But early evidence from Australia, which passed an under-16 ban in December, suggests enforcement is harder than legislation. The Australian government has accused Meta, TikTok, and YouTube of failing to comply, lending weight to Meloni’s argument that bans without platform cooperation are hollow.

The G7 compromise

The G7 leaders, including US President Donald Trump, endorsed a declaration on protecting children online that makes no mention of banning access to social media. The US had previously expressed concerns about the British ban, warning against one-size-fits-all measures.

The declaration calls for safety-by-design principles, age-appropriate recommender systems, and action on AI-generated child sexual abuse material. It aligns more closely with the EU’s Digital Services Act, which puts content-moderation and transparency obligations on platforms, than with the outright bans favoured by London and Paris.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Ghost CMS flaw abused to push ClickFix attacks on hundreds of sites

Pierluigi Paganini
May 25, 2026

Threat actors are actively exploiting a security flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-26980, in Ghost CMS that was fixed months ago in real attacks against unpatched websites. According to Qianxin, the campaign has already affected more than 700 sites, including well-known organizations and universities.

The vulnerability is an SQL injection issue in Ghost’s Content API that can let an attacker read data from the database without logging in. In the worst case, this can expose the Admin API key, which can allow attackers to take over the site.

That key matters because it can be used to change published content. In this campaign, attackers used it to edit articles on compromised Ghost sites and insert malicious JavaScript at the end of pages. The goal was not just defacement, but to turn trusted websites into launch points for further malware delivery.

“After an in-depth investigation and analysis, we determined that this was not a targeted intrusion against the customer, but rather a large-scale poisoning campaign by an in-the-wild attack group targeting Ghost CMS. Although CVE-2026-26980 was publicly disclosed as early as February 19, a large number of users did not patch and upgrade in time, providing an opportunity for attackers.” reads the advisory published by Qianxin. “At least two groups are currently actively conducting such poisoning operations, and some sites have even become the target of competition between the two parties, with different malicious code being implanted one after another within a single day.”

The inserted code led visitors through a two-step chain. First, the page loaded a remote script that checked the browser and decided what the visitor should see. Then real victims were redirected to a fake verification page that looked like a normal “I’m human” check.

This is where the ClickFix part began. The page told users to press Windows+R, paste a command, and hit Enter. In practice, that command downloaded and started a malware payload on the victim’s machine. It was a classic social engineering trick: make the user do the dangerous part themselves.

Qianxin says the first signs of this activity appeared in early May. The malicious code found in the campaign had a compilation date of February 16, the same day Ghost announced the fix for CVE-2026-26980. That suggests the attackers moved quickly once they saw how many sites had not been updated.

The affected websites cover a wide range of sectors. Roughly half are personal blogs or independent sites, but the list also includes technology blogs, AI sites, media outlets, crypto projects, and educational institutions. Qianxin researchers say victims include sites linked to Harvard, Oxford, and DuckDuckGo.

The attack chain was also designed to be flexible. The loaders could fetch different payloads depending on the target, and the operators changed infrastructure several times.

“entire attack process has obvious five-stage characteristics of “CMS Takeover → Page Poisoning → Two-stage Loading → Social Engineering Lure (FakeCaptcha/ClickFix) → Malware Delivery”, and the entire process is highly automated: bulk vulnerability scanning → automatic key extraction → bulk injection → dynamic C2 distribution.” states the report.

In some cases, they switched domains after detection, keeping the campaign alive even when part of the chain was blocked.

“Through feature scanning of publicly accessible pages, we have cumulatively identified more than 700 poisoned victim domains, and have proactively contacted the sites for which contact information could be obtained, notifying them of the poisoning.” continues the report.

Qianxin also believes at least two different groups are involved. In some cases, the same site was hit more than once, with one attacker replacing the code left by another. That makes the campaign harder to clean up and shows how attractive compromised Ghost sites have become for abuse.

For site owners, the advice is straightforward. Ghost should be updated immediately, all credentials should be rotated, and site logs should be reviewed for suspicious admin API activity. Any injected scripts should be removed from the database itself, not just from the visual editor. Visitors who may have reached a poisoned site should also be warned.

The report includes Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) for the attacks observed by the researchers.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Ghost CMS)







Source link