8 Samsung background apps you can safely uninstall (without breaking anything)


Samsung wants to make its own software, but it’s also required to ship Google apps if it wants access to the Play Store. This means Galaxy devices come with an overabundance of icons, some of which run in the background regardless of whether you ever open them. Here’s what’s safe to purge.

Bixby

A secondary voice assistant, even on Samsung phones

You can be forgiven for not knowing about Bixby, even as someone carrying a Samsung Galaxy phone. Despite Samsung creating its own voice assistant, the company nudges you towards Gemini more often than not. If you prefer Gemini or you don’t care for AI assistance at all, it’s absolutely safe to get rid of Bixby the same way you uninstall or disable any other Android app.

s26 ultra product image

Brand

Samsung

SoC

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Get the new Galaxy S26 Ultra with AI smarts and an all-new privacy display. It’s big, powerful, packed with AI, and you’ll love the S-Pen stylus. 


SmartThings

Samsung smart home platform of choice

SmartThings is Samsung’s platform for controlling Samsung appliances, Matter-enabled devices, and select other smart home devices throughout your home. While I eventually settled on using a Homey hub to control my smart home, SmartThings was my first, and it remains a good option. If you don’t have any smart home devices or if you’ve also settled on a different choice, then you’re free to do without SmartThings entirely.

Samsung Wallet

Samsung’s preferred way to tap-to-pay

There are three major options for making mobile payments with your phone in the US: Apple Pay, Google Wallet, and Samsung Wallet. Each is useful for reasons beyond financial transactions. You can use any of them to store your loyalty cards, transit cards, or digital keys. While the least popular of the three, there are reasons to use Samsung over Google Wallet. If you choose not to, you might as well remove it.

Samsung Health

A great fitness app, but only if you want it

Samsung Health is an app for monitoring your physical activity and various biometrics. You can use it to keep track of your steps, how well you sleep at night, and how much energy you wake up with in the morning. If you enjoy tracking all of the things, you can use Samsung Health to keep tabs on your calorie intake and how much water you drink. It can also help with your medications.

While some of these features work well enough with only a phone, many are at their best when paired with a Samsung wearable such as a Galaxy Watch or Galaxy Ring. If you don’t own those devices, or you’re simply not interested in this type of data, then the app might as well go.

Galaxy Wearables

For those Galaxy accessories you may not even own

On the subject of wearables, we come to Samsung’s app for controlling its various accessories. There has been a time in my life where I managed many of my devices through this app. I wore a Galaxy Watch on my wrist, had a Galaxy Ring on my finger, and had Galaxy Buds in my ear. I ultimately found the Galaxy Ring uncomfortable and didn’t stick with it for long. If you only have a Galaxy phone and none of the other devices in Samsung’s ecosystem, then this is one app you can easily give the boot.

Samsung Flow

Samsung’s take on Apple continuity

Samsung Flow app details in the Settings app on a Samsung Galaxy tablet.

I concentrate most of my computing on a single device, a book-style foldable phone that I use as my PC. For most of us, our digital lives are scattered about. We need to interact with our phones, laptops, and tablets. Samsung Flow is an app for connecting your devices together, allowing notifications, phone calls, and files to move seamlessly between them. You can think of it as Samsung’s version of Apple’s Continuity, which connects various devices in the Apple ecosystem. If you don’t have a Windows PC that you’re trying to connect to your Samsung phone, or you’re simply not interested in the feature, then you’re free to turn Flow off without missing out on anything.

Secure Folder

A place for files and apps that are best kept separate

Secure Folder is a place to stash private files as well as apps you want to keep separate from your daily smartphone use. It also allows you to have multiple versions of an app, so just if you have two YouTube accounts that you’d like to sign in to. I use the secure folder as a place to sequester apps that I don’t trust, like Instagram, WhatsApp, or anything else from Meta. But if you’re not using this special hiding spot, feel free to disable it.

Smart Switch

A vital app that you’ll rarely use

Smart Switch is the kind of app that you only use once or twice over the life of your phone. It transfers data from your previous phone to your new one. That means you’re most likely to use it when you’ve just bought your phone, and you probably won’t think of it again for a few years until it’s time to get a new one. During the time in between, you don’t need to have it installed.


With the right knowledge, you can remove any app

The above apps may be options that Samsung allows you to uninstall or disable, but that doesn’t mean you have to resign yourself to other Samsung background apps that you wish to get rid of. If you’re comfortable with connecting your phone to a PC and using ADB, then you can disable any app you wish. While certain features may stop working, unless you venture toward core system apps, your phone will still boot even after a thorough purge of the apps you consider bloatware.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link