73% of tech job listings require AI skills now: 3 ways to show off yours


gettyimages-2225979990-cropped

Alexander Spatari/Moment via Getty

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Seventy-three percent of tech job ads require AI skills.
  • Job seekers need to demonstrate their AI fluency.
  • Domain expertise remains crucial.

More job descriptions than ever are soliciting AI skills, according to a new report from tech hiring platform Dice. 

An analysis of 7 million tech job postings in the US from May 2026 revealed that 73% required at least one AI skill, underscoring that a practical grasp of the technology is becoming a baseline expectation among employers. In January 2024, that percentage stood at 15%.

“A lot of these [skills] are going to just become table stakes,” Dice CEO Art Zeile told ZDNET.

Also: AI agents are your new colleagues – how to get the best results

For tech job seekers already navigating a rocky job market, proving to employers that they have the necessary skills is paramount. 

How much do certifications matter?

Though the tech job landscape is rapidly shifting, there are some tried-and-true practices that can help prospective hires communicate to employers that they can actually do the job. 

One, Zeile said, is certifications. 

Certifications have long been a way for IT professionals to demonstrate proficiency in various areas. Zeile said Dice has been tracking the emergence of certifications for AI skills. Two years ago, job seekers might not have had many options. Now, companies like AWS and Google offer certifications for generative AI developer, machine learning engineer and more. 

“If you ask me, what would be super impressive… you went through a training program, and you passed the test. You’re certified,” Zeile said. 

Also: How to beat the AI algorithm and get the job of your dreams

Zeile also spoke to the importance of being able to talk through projects and their results.

Columbia University’s Center for Career Education, for example, advises not just listing generic job duties on a resume, but what you accomplished, how, and why.

Saying you know Python isn’t enough. Pointing to a project that perhaps saved your last company time or money is a different story. Zeile said that could also mean coming into an interview with an agent you’ve built.

Additionally, the Dice report called out the importance of the intersection between a candidate’s own area of expertise and their fluency with AI tools.

Dan Hillman is an interview engineer at Karat, a company that runs technical assessments for clients such as Google, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, and others. He said he’s looking for how well candidates can use their own expertise to audit and manage AI tools to solve a problem, rather than just deferring to the AI.

Also: AI is causing cognitive fatigue. Here’s how to work with more haste and less speed

“[It’s] not about testing only how well you can work with AI. It’s testing how well you work in your domain, augmented by AI,” he said.

Hillman recommended doing practice problems ahead of the interview, using AI. Find a problem, come up with your own approach first, and then work with the AI tool, and always go back and review.

“That is how you can exercise your muscle while ensuring that you have that AI proficiency skill,” he said. 

Personal plans for continued reskilling

He also emphasized the importance of explaining your process — how you gather information up front, write specific prompts, question outputs, and budget time. 

Apart from a technical interview, candidates can also demonstrate their proficiency by talking through their personal plans for continued reskilling, said Michael Morris, global head of platform and talent at Randstad Digital.

“Job seekers today that don’t come in with a real training and upskilling personal plan — I wouldn’t consider them,” Morris said, noting that resources like online courses can help tech professionals stay nimble, especially as new models crop up so quickly. Candidates have to show that they have a strategy to keep up.

Further, Morris said it’s important for candidates to understand how their job role might be affected by advances in AI and show they have a plan, particularly if their specialty is vulnerable to displacement. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link