3 gripping Netflix thrillers worth watching this week (April 13-19)


We’re inching closer to the blockbuster movie season, which unofficially begins the first weekend in May. However, Netflix gave us a taste of the summer with a new shark thriller that premiered on April 10. It might not be Jaws, but I’m always entertained by sharks and how they terrorize humans. That formula will always work for me.

The new shark movie is our top thriller of the week. Speaking of animals, a vicious lion headlines our second pick this week. Our final thriller this week puts a killer on the rapids. Check out all of these movies on Netflix in the U.S.

River Wild

Grab your paddles

In 1994, Meryl Streep, Kevin Bacon, and David Strathairn took audiences to the world of whitewater rafting. Considering rapids create natural life-or-death situations, it becomes a natural setting for a thriller. Essentially, Streep, a river guide, and her family must help two fugitives (Bacon and John C. Reilly) navigate the dangerous terrain and escape to freedom.

When I heard about the River Wild semi-remake, I was skeptical and rightfully so. After watching the 2023 version, it plays more like a reimagining and standalone sequel, but it’s surprisingly effective. Two siblings, Gray (Taran Killam) and Joey (Leighton Meester), embark on a whitewater rafting trip with a few friends, including Trevor (Adam Brody). What should be a fairly easy trip, soon turns into a nightmare after Trevor may or may not have attacked one of his friends.

I grew up watching The O.C., so seeing Brody as a villain instead of a lovable goof is jarring. However, casting against type works because I’m furious when Trevor goes full psychopath. Seth Cohen would never hurt anyone, especially if that person is Blair Waldorf—played by Leighton Meester, who is his real-life wife. River Wild is a fun and twisty 91-minute thriller that I would willingly watch again.

Beast

Idris Elba fights a lion

Man versus animal is a tale as old as time. On one side, you have a human, the supposedly smarter being in this situation, though animals often thwart human plans. On the other hand, you have the beast, a relentless animal intent on killing humans at all costs. Is there an argument that movies villainize animals too much? Sure, it exists. I’m willing to look past this in the name of fictional cinematic fun.

And Beast is a lot of fun. How many times in this lifetime will Idris Elba square off against a lion? Not many, so let’s take advantage of it. Following the death of his wife, Nate Samuels (Elba) embarks on a vacation to a wildlife reserve in South Africa with his two daughters, Meredith (Iyana Halley) and Norah (Leah Sava Jeffries). While exploring a restricted area, a lion attacks Nate and his girls. The group deduces that the lion lost his pride to poachers, forcing the beast to go rogue.

Beast’s simple plot—humans must outsmart a lion—is ideal for a 93-minute survival thriller. It reminds me of the movie The Shallows, where a stranded Blake Lively must battle a shark. I would say that Beast has better jump scares than The Shallows. Overall, it’s a welcome addition to a popular genre.

Thrash

Sharks in the water

It’s not a good week for humanity in the thriller section of Netflix. After you watch Idris Elba take on a lion, check out a group of bull sharks terrorizing an East Coast town in Thrash. Like many, including myself, your first thought when reading the synopsis is: Could this actually happen? The answer is yes. Producer Adam McKay told Tudum that something similar happened in an Australian town after historic floods.

With the fact vs. fiction debate out of the way, Thrash depicts the residents of Annieville preparing for a Category 5 hurricane. This includes Lisa (Phoebe Dynevor), a pregnant woman trapped in town; Dale (Djimon Hounsou), a marine researcher; Dakota (Whitney Peak), Dale’s niece who suffers from agoraphobia; and a trio of foster siblings (Alyla Browne, Stacy Clausen, and Dante Ubaldi). Because of the flooding, sharks flood the town, putting all the aforementioned people at risk.

I can’t get enough of the shark movies. It probably stems from my love for Jaws. There’s something about a shark creeping up on an unsuspecting human in the water that sends a chill down my spine. Some parts of Thrash are what I call “dumb fun.” You turn your brain off and enjoy the carnage. Plus, it’s an 86-minute sprint to the finish. Sign me up for more Thrash-style movies from Netflix.


thrash-poster.jpg

Thrash


Release Date

April 10, 2026

Runtime

83 Minutes

Director

Tommy Wirkola





More Netflix movies to watch

Netflix has thousands of movies to stream with the click of a button. If you’re looking for Oscar-winning movies, give films Ray or Boyhood a chance. Elsewhere, try a blockbuster like Anaconda or Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle.

Subscription with ads

Yes, $8/month

Simultaneous streams

Two or four




Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link