3 awesome Paramount+ movies new to watch this week (May 4


Paramount+‘s May slate of new movies are here, providing U.S. subscribers with some solid choices for weekday movie nights this week and beyond—that is, if you’re not going to be preoccupied with Taylor Sheridan’s newest Yellowstone spinoff, Dutton Ranch, coming May 15.

We have time, so let’s see what movie we can wrangle up. For this week, three movies caught my eye—genre-bending, slapstick kung-fu comedy, Tom Clancy’s intense submarine thriller, and a dark, L.A. comedy that launched the careers of two Hollywood stars.

3

Shaolin Soccer (2001)

Everybody was kung-fu fighting … with soccer balls

It was the highest-grossing film in Hong Kong history when it premiered in 2001, but Shaolin Soccer‘s status as a global cult phenomenon cannot be understated. It’s such a unique, stylish, and genre-bending film that its influence would later be felt strongly in movies like Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, Kung Fu Panda, and Dodgeball: An Underdog Story, which is more or less Shaolin Soccer, with dodgeballs.

Written and directed by the Chinese “King of Comedy,” Stephen Chow, Shaolin Soccer is a supremely goofy, slapstick sports comedy with loads of high-flying martial arts acrobatics and unapologetically bad CGI effects—and did I mention it’s about soccer, too? The movie follows Sing (played by Chow), a poor street sweeper and devotee of Shaolin kung fu, looking for a new way to bring its teachings to the world. When Sing meets washed-up soccer legend Fung (Ng Man-tat) and Sing discovers he can use Shaolin to supernatural effect in soccer, the pair assembles a motley crew of Shaolin kung-fu brothers and a gifted goalkeeper named Mui, to win the China Super Cup against the dirty Team Evil.

Shaolin Soccer really is like nothing you’ve seen before—it’s hilarious, filled with elaborate martial arts and physical comedy sequences, flaming, exploding soccer balls, and cheesy dialogue. It’s a much-loved film with an 89% critics’ rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

2

The Hunt for Red October (1990)

Sean Connery’s Russian sub captain has a Scottish accent

Alec Baldwin was the first actor to portray Tom Clancy’s now-iconic CIA analyst Jack Ryan (Harrison Ford, Ben Affleck, Chris Pine, and John Krasinski would later take up the mantle), who made his first screen appearance in Die Hard director John McTiernan’s epic Cold War submarine movie, The Hunt for Red October.

If you can put aside the fact that Sean Connery doesn’t even try to mask his thick Scottish accent as Soviet naval captain Marko Ramius (it actually makes for some classically quotable lines—”Some things in here don’t react well to bullets.”), then you’ll easily get drawn into this tense undersea game of cat-and-mouse.



















Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

Jack Ryan actors, movies, and shows
Trivia challenge

From the Cold War to the streaming era — how well do you know Tom Clancy’s most iconic hero?

ActorsMoviesTV ShowsCharactersHistory

Which actor was the first to portray Jack Ryan on the big screen?

Correct! Alec Baldwin played Jack Ryan in The Hunt for Red October (1990), the first film adaptation of Tom Clancy’s novels. Baldwin’s portrayal was praised, though he declined to return for the sequel.

Not quite. Alec Baldwin was the first actor to play Jack Ryan, appearing in The Hunt for Red October in 1990. Harrison Ford later took over the role starting with Patriot Games in 1992.

In which film does Harrison Ford’s Jack Ryan foil an assassination attempt on the British royal family?

Correct! Patriot Games (1992) sees Jack Ryan intervene to stop an IRA splinter group targeting a member of the British royal family, drawing them into a personal vendetta against Ryan and his own family.

Not quite. The answer is Patriot Games (1992). Harrison Ford’s Ryan stumbles into an IRA assassination plot against British royals, which sets off a dangerous personal conflict that follows him home to the United States.

On the Amazon Prime Video series Jack Ryan, which actor plays the title role?

Correct! John Krasinski, best known for playing Jim Halpert on The Office, took on the role of Jack Ryan for Amazon’s streaming series, which debuted in 2018 and ran for four seasons.

Not quite. John Krasinski plays Jack Ryan in the Amazon Prime Video series. It was a significant departure from his comedic roots, and his casting surprised many fans who knew him primarily from The Office.

Which 2002 film features Ben Affleck as a younger Jack Ryan investigating a nuclear terrorism plot?

Correct! Ben Affleck starred in The Sum of All Fears (2002), which reimagined Ryan as a younger CIA analyst tracking a neo-Nazi group attempting to trigger a nuclear war between the US and Russia.

Not quite. The Sum of All Fears (2002) features Ben Affleck as Jack Ryan. The film rebooted the character as a younger analyst, departing from Harrison Ford’s older, more seasoned portrayal of the role.

What is Jack Ryan’s professional background before becoming a full CIA operative?

Correct! In Tom Clancy’s novels, Jack Ryan served as a Marine and later became a history professor at the US Naval Academy before joining the CIA as an analyst. This intellectual background is central to his character.

Not quite. Jack Ryan’s backstory involves serving in the Marines, then becoming a history professor before his CIA career. This academic and military combination gives him a unique analytical edge that defines the character across adaptations.

Which film marks Chris Pine’s only appearance as Jack Ryan?

Correct! Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit (2014) was Chris Pine’s sole outing as the character. The film was an original story not based on any Clancy novel, featuring Kenneth Branagh as the villain. It underperformed at the box office.

Not quite. The film is Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit (2014). Chris Pine played a modernized, rebooted version of the character in this standalone film, which unfortunately did not perform well enough to launch the intended franchise.

In the Amazon Jack Ryan series, which country is the primary threat in Season 1?

Correct! Season 1 of the Amazon series focuses on a rising Islamist terrorist leader with ties to Iran, as Ryan tracks financial transactions that lead him into a dangerous international conspiracy.

Not quite. Season 1 centers on a terrorist threat connected to Iran. Jack Ryan follows suspicious financial activity that draws him out of his analyst desk job and into the field for the first time in the series.

Tom Clancy’s first Jack Ryan novel, The Hunt for Red October, was originally published in which year?

Correct! The Hunt for Red October was published in 1984 by the Naval Institute Press. It became a massive bestseller and famously received a public endorsement from President Ronald Reagan, launching Clancy’s legendary career.

Not quite. The Hunt for Red October was published in 1984. It was notably one of the first major books released by the Naval Institute Press, and President Ronald Reagan’s praise helped turn it into an international phenomenon.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

Ramius has gone rogue at the helm of the Typhoon-class nuclear missile-carrying sub Red October, and he has designs on defecting to the U.S. The Soviets have learned this and are chasing Ramius down, while the American Navy is also in pursuit of what they see as a potential nuclear threat. The only one who’s gotten into the head of Ramius is the clever Ryan, who must convince his superiors of Ramius’ true intentions and race to intercept the Red October before it’s blown out of the water.

It’s the best submarine movie ever made (with the exception of Das Boot), and is so tense and action-packed all the way through that you won’t notice Connery’s accent.

1

Swingers (1996)

A movie so money, it doesn’t even know it

Long before Jon Favreau was Happy Hogan and later one of the beating hearts behind the Star Wars Universe, and before Vince Vaughn was a Hollywood leading man, the pair were young L.A. players, Mike and Trent in the 1996 indie hit, Swingers​​​​​. Written by Favreau and directed by Doug Liman (Edge of Tomorrow), it’s a quintessential ’90s dark buddy comedy that’s stylish, funny, and full of endlessly quotable lingo—much of it centered around the use of the word “money.”

The semi-autobiographical story follows Mike (Favreau), a struggling comedian from New York trying to make it in L.A.’s stand-up scene, and is still moping around six months after a big breakup. Luckily (or perhaps unluckily), his slick-talking best friend, Trent (Vaughn), thinks Mike is “money.” In fact, “You’re so money, and you don’t even know it,” Trent tells him. To get Mike back in the game, they start hitting up the hippest L.A. clubs and take a trip to Vegas so Mike can meet some “beautiful babies.”

That’s more or less the plot, but Swingers is as much about the hang-out culture and camaraderie of this group of friends (made up of Favreau’s real-life friends, like Vaughn, Ron Livingston, Patrick Van Horn, and Alex Desert), as Mikey flirts, learns the art of when to call a girl back, and regains his confidence.


We want you to get the most out of your Paramount+ subscription, so we’re here to help you find something great to watch as the streaming service adds and removes movie titles each month. If, however, you’re hungry for more curated picks, we also have roundups across Netflix, HBO Max, and more on How-To Geek.

paramount__logo.jpg

Subscription with ads

Yes, $8/month

Simultaneous streams

3

If you enjoy CBS offerings, you’ll want to subscribe to Paramount+. You get access to hit shows like Star Trek and Yellowstone, as well as a variety of SHOWTIME content.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link