Valar Atomics raises $450M at $2B valuation to power AI with small nuclear reactors



Isaiah Taylor was sixteen when he decided the nuclear industry had a size problem. Not that reactors were too dangerous or too expensive, though they are both, but that they were simply too big. The multi-gigawatt monuments to Cold War-era engineering that still dot the American landscape were designed for a grid that moved power in one direction: from a distant plant to a distant city. They were never meant to sit behind a hyperscaler’s fence line, feeding a cluster of GPU racks whose appetite doubles every eighteen months.

Taylor, now 27, founded Valar Atomics in 2023 to build something different. On Tuesday, the El Segundo, California-based startup announced it has raised $450 million at a $2 billion valuation, according to Bloomberg. The round comprises $340 million in equity and $110 million in debt, and it lands barely five months after a $130 million Series A that valued the company at a fraction of its current price.

The backers read like a roster of the American defence-tech establishment that has lately been writing enormous cheques. Palmer Luckey, the Anduril Industries founder whose company was recently reported to be pursuing a $4 billion raise at a $60 billion valuation, is an investor. So is Shyam Sankar, the chief technology officer of Palantir Technologies. The earlier Series A was led by Snowpoint Ventures, the firm co-founded by Doug Philippone, Palantir’s former head of global defence, alongside Day One Ventures and Dream Ventures. Lockheed Martin board member and former AT&T chief executive John Donovan also participated.

Valar’s pitch is built around what it calls “gigasites”, sprawling industrial campuses that would host hundreds or even thousands of small, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors operating in concert. Each unit uses helium as a coolant and TRISO fuel encased in graphite, a combination that allows the reactors to run at significantly higher temperatures than conventional light-water designs. The company says these clusters can deliver dense, steady, carbon-free power tailored to the load profiles of AI data centres, industrial manufacturers, and grid-constrained regions.

It is an audacious answer to an increasingly urgent question: where will the electricity come from? The International Energy Agency projects that data-centre power consumption will double by 2026. Goldman Sachs estimates that 85 to 90 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity will eventually be needed to help fill the gap. Microsoft, Amazon, and Google have all signed nuclear power agreements in recent months, but the reactors those deals depend on do not yet exist at commercial scale.

Valar claims a meaningful head start. In November 2025, the company announced that its NOVA Core achieved zero-power criticality at Los Alamos National Laboratory’s National Criticality Experiments Research Centre, making it what the Breakthrough Institute described as the first company to reach that milestone under the US Department of Energy’s Nuclear Reactor Pilot Programme. Zero-power criticality — a self-sustaining chain reaction of uranium-235 without reaching full operating temperatures — is a necessary validation step, not a working power plant, but it is further than most of Valar’s competitors have publicly demonstrated.

The company is now preparing its Ward250 reactor, a 100-kilowatt thermal high-temperature gas-cooled unit, for power operations at the Utah San Rafael Energy Research Centre. In February 2026, the reactor was airlifted from California to Utah aboard three C-17 Globemaster military cargo aircraft in a joint operation between the Departments of Defence and Energy — a logistical stunt that doubled as a proof of concept for rapid reactor deployment. Valar is targeting operational status before 4 July 2026, the deadline the DOE set for three reactors in its pilot programme to achieve criticality.

Taylor’s trajectory has been unconventional even by deep-tech standards. A self-taught coder who launched his first venture as a teenager, he comes from a family with nuclear roots: his great-grandfather, Ward Schaap, was a physicist on the Manhattan Project. The Ward250 reactor carries Schaap’s name. Taylor has assembled a leadership team that includes Mark Mitchell, the former president of Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation, and Muhammad Shahzad, the former president and chief financial officer of Relativity Space.

The competitive field is crowded and well-funded. TerraPower, backed by Bill Gates, broke ground on a sodium-cooled reactor in Wyoming last year. Kairos Power is building a molten-salt demonstration plant in Tennessee. X-energy has a partnership with Dow Chemical for an industrial HTGR. Oklo, which went public via a SPAC in 2024, is developing a fast-neutron microreactor. None has yet delivered commercial power from an advanced design.

Valar has also taken a combative approach to regulation that few young companies would risk. In April 2025, the startup sued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, arguing that the agency’s licensing framework unlawfully restricts small-scale reactor innovation by requiring the same approval process for low-power test reactors as for full-scale commercial plants. The lawsuit, filed alongside the states of Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Florida, and Arizona, as well as fellow reactor startups Last Energy and Deep Fission, seeks to shift regulatory authority for small reactors to individual states. The case has since been paused amid the Trump administration’s broader executive order to overhaul the NRC.

The $2 billion valuation places Valar among the most richly valued nuclear startups in the United States, a distinction that would have seemed absurd five years ago. Whether the premium reflects genuine confidence in the technology or the gravitational pull of AI-adjacent capital is a question the next eighteen months should begin to answer. If the Ward250 reaches power operations in Utah this summer, Valar will have done something no advanced-reactor startup has managed: moved from incorporation to criticality to grid-connected electricity in roughly three years. If it does not, $2 billion will buy a very expensive physics experiment in the desert.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modularity was one of the most exciting phone trends of the 2010s. It promised phones that would work like desktop PCs, allowing owners to upgrade individual components, add new functionalities, and replace broken parts with ease, improving longevity and ushering in a new, sustainable smartphone era.

While its early days looked promising thanks to pioneers like Modu, which launched the first modular phone in 2008, Google’s Project Ara, and Motorola’s Moto Z lineup, the modularity dream ultimately fizzled out. But not before begetting a few exciting modular phones that captured our attention, if nothing else.

1

Google Project Ara

Google Project Ara prototype modular phone with various modules placed around it. Credit: Google

After Google acquired modular phone-related patents from Modu, which closed its doors in 2011, Google and Motorola, which Google bought in 2011, began exploring the modular phone concept in 2012. Google Project Ara officially kicked off in 2013, with the design philosophy based on Dave Hakkens’ Phonebloks concept.

The original idea was for Google/Motorola to produce the phone’s base, the so-called “Endo” (exoskeleton) frame, with third-party vendors providing everything else, from displays to cameras to batteries. Modules would attach to the phone via an innovative magnetic mechanism with hot swap support.

A Google Project Ara prototype along with a bunch of modules around it. Credit: Google

The dream was to provide a modular phone where almost everything would be easily replaceable and upgradable. Google had to walk back some of the original design choices, such as the ability to replace the screen and the SoC, due to hardware limitations, but the project didn’t abandon its promise of modularity.

Sadly, after three years of development, Google pulled the plug on Project Ara in September 2016, citing high costs and manufacturing issues. Project Ara (kind of) lived on in Motorola’s Moto Mods, but we’ve never gotten a proper Project Ara modular smartphone.

A crying shame because the college me had his mind blown by the whole modular phone movement of the 2010s. Even today, I’d love nothing more than to play around with Project Ara prototypes, if only for a few minutes.

2

LG G5

A hand holding the LG G5 phone. Credit: LG Mobile

LG had a few Android hits back in the early 2010s. The LG G2 is still one of the prettiest Android phones ever, and it sold quite well. The G3 ironed out its predecessor’s kinks while keeping up its sales momentum. But the upward trajectory stalled with the LG G4, so the Korean giant decided to shake up its flagship series.

Enter the LG G5, one of LG’s most ambitious phones ever. The phone’s bottom segment was removable, allowing owners to quickly install modules LG touted as “Friends,” which included various extra functionalities. You had a high-end DAC and Amp, a module that packed extra battery capacity and additional camera controls, and a module with a replaceable battery, allowing you to swap in a new one in a jiff.

LG G5 with a camera module attached to it and another module lying next to it Credit: LG

While the phone piqued the attention of smartphone enthusiasts, myself included, sales showed that the mainstream audience wasn’t exactly engrossed by the concept. Ultimately, the LG G5 had disappointing sales numbers, and LG abandoned its “friends” modular add-ons ecosystem shortly after, with the G5 staying the only modular phone in LG’s lineup.

LG Wing.


The 10 Weirdest Android Phones Ever

Phones weren’t always boring slabs.

3

Essential Phone (Essential PH-1)

Essential Phone PH-1 with Essential written in the foreground. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | Essential Products

The Essential Phone had a lot going for it even before it hit the shelves. The brainchild of Andy Rubin, the father of Android, the phone created quite a buzz in the tech world back when it was announced in the spring of 2017. Its bold design, which debuted the notch, ditched the 3.5mm headphone jack, and made the two camera lenses flush with the phone’s slick ceramic back, was a head turner.

Early promotional photos showed the phone with a camera module attached. It was later revealed that the Essential PH-1 features a magnetic Click Connector on the upper right of its back. The connector allowed the PH-1 to be used with custom-made modules, and while Essential only provided one module at launch, the 360° camera, it promised more modules further down the road.

Essential Phone with its 360 camera module attached to it. Credit: Essential

Alas, the Essential PH-1 didn’t sell that well, even after receiving a $200 price reduction shortly after launch. This affected Essential’s promise of modularity. Ultimately, we only got one extra module that incorporated a headphone jack and a high-end DAC. While the PH-1 had a lot of promise (I loved its vanilla Android experience, modularity, and flush design), it didn’t pan out. Its successor, the Essential PH-2, was canceled, we never got new modules, and Karl Pei’s Nothing bought the Essential brand in 2021.

4

Motorola Moto Z

A Motorola Moto Z phone against a green background Credit: Motorola

Motorola’s Moto Mods modular ecosystem is, hands down, the most well-received, popular, and longest-lived modular phone undertaking in history. It all started in 2016 with the release of the Motorola Moto Z, one of the thinnest phones of all time and a real looker even by modern standards.

Drawing on experience from working on Google’s Project Ara, Motorola’s engineers developed a magnetic attachment system powered by pogo pins that used barely any space on the Moto Z’s slender body. The phone arrived with a wide selection of Moto Mods, including a power bank, a great-sounding JBL speaker, as well as more exotic add-ons such as a projector and a full-fledged point-and-shoot camera with a 10x zoom.

Various moto mods modules lying on a table Credit: Motorola

Unlike other modular phone projects, Motorola provided a wide selection of Moto Mods at launch and greatly expanded the offering over the years. The company supported Moto Mods across four generations of Moto Z devices, with a total of 7 phones compatible with modular add-ons. Even some community-developed Moto Mods projects saw the light of day, like the slide-out keyboard mod.

Unfortunately, the Moto Mods project was abandoned in 2019, with the Moto Z4 being the last modular handset from Motorola. Despite its demise, Moto Mods left the deepest mark on the promise of modularity in Android, which still (kind of) lives on.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Moto Z


Samsung’s “Thin” Galaxy S25 Edge Is Thicker Than a 9 Year Old Motorola Phone

Phones have gotten thicker.

5

Fairphone

Fairphone 5 front and back Credit: Corbin Davenport / Fairphone

While not as exciting as other phones on this list, the Fairphone series of Android smartphones is the closest thing we’ve gotten to Google’s Project Ara. Aside from the original Fairphone, every member of the Fairphone family is an easy-to-repair, modular Android phone.

Instead of extra features, modular parts in Fairphone devices are there to allow for a high degree of repairability. They include the display, camera module with interchangeable lenses, an easy-to-replace battery, the SoC module, and modular daughterboards and flex cables.

A Fairphone 6 with its back removed Credit: Fairphone

They’re straightforward to remove and reattach, allowing owners to repair their phones by themselves from the comfort of their home. All you need are some screwdrivers and tweezers, spare parts you can order directly from the Fairphone spare parts shop, and you’re off to the races.

Despite being one of the easiest phones to repair, the latest Fairphone offering—the Fairphone 6—is anything but popular. It’s a niche device that the mainstream audience, as well as many enthusiasts, aren’t interested in, because being fully modular entails certain compromises (a plastic body, a mid-range chipset, cameras that trail high-end options, and more) that most phone users don’t want to deal with.


While the promise of modularity was exciting in the 2010s, the cold, harsh truth is that most of us will always choose high-end features and hard-to-repair unibody designs over sustainable, repairable modular phones.

iPhone MagSafe and accessories


Apple Proved Modular Accessories Work, But Can Anyone Else Do It?

Apple succeeds where many have failed.



Source link