Trump Mobile’s T1 smartphone is still vaporware


Trump Mobile has repeatedly let down over half a million people waiting for its T1 smartphone, with the fabled device still not going on sale almost a year after its launch. It may never do so.

Launched back in June 2025, the Trump Organization’s Trump Mobile said it would release the T1 smartphone as a “made-in-USA” device. It was a popular device for supporters of President Trump, but no-one’s managed to actually get their hands on it.

Approximately 590,000 people put a deposit of $100 down for the smartphone, which would ultimately sell at $499, reports IBTimes. Despite receiving an advance in the region of $59 million, Trump Mobile has yet to ship a single unit to consumers.

There doesn’t seem to be any sign of it arriving by the quickly approaching one-year mark, either.

A stretching timeline

The T1 was pitched as a “Made in USA” smartphone, almost in response to Apple and others constructing the iPhone and other smartphones in other countries. Shortly after its introduction and after many assurances of its USA-centric nature, the Internet quickly determined that it was probably a rebadged budget Android device made in China.

The research didn’t stop the surge of preorders for the device, even when Trump Mobile silently dropped the “Made in America” claim.

After failing to ship in the late summer of 2025, the release date kept being moved back to later in the year, then into early 2026. A redesign of the Trump Mobile website in April 2026 removed the release date entirely, instead showing a link to “join the waitlist.”

Three gold smartphones displaying Trump branding, including large T logos, American flag engravings, and a screen reading TRUMP Mobile and Make America Great Again with a gold patriotic background.

Previous images of the fabled Trump Mobile T1

Reports into the delay involved one call center representative telling journalists that the T1 was in the “final stages of certification and field testing” in January 2026. There was apparently a ship date of Q1 2026, but that has passed.

At one point, a representative blamed a 43-day federal government shutdown, though critics pointed out that such a claim didn’t really impact a privately held hardware producer.

Considerable doubt

While those who have put down a deposit for the T1 are patiently waiting, there is a possibility that they may not ever get the smartphone at all.

The April website update also included a revised terms of service, which discussed the deposit scheme. The document states that the deposit is not a guarantee that they will receive a working device.

Instead, it explains that the deposit provides “only a conditional opportunity” if Trump Mobile actually puts the T1 on sale. The deposit isn’t a biding sales contract, doesn’t lock the price, can change specifications before release, and isn’t even guaranteed to function on a phone network.

At best, depositors have paid $100 that could turn into a $100 credit towards the T1. That is, if it goes on sale.

If Trump Mobile decides to cancel the T1 entirely, it will issue refunds of the original deposit amount. However, it won’t be liable for any delays caused for issues such as “parts shortages or hold-ups with regulators.

Consumers can also submit a request for a cancellation before a sale is completed.

FTC radio silence

The severe lack of progress has led to some lawmaker complaints about the ordeal. This includes a request from Senator Elizabeth Warren and other Democratic lawmakers to the Federal Trade Commission in January, over the use of alleged “bait-and-switch tactics” and false advertising over the “Made in the USA” claim.

However, as of May 2026, the FTC has not confirmed the existence of such an investigation, nor if one will ever be opened.

As it stands, 590,000 consumers have handed over their money for a smartphone that isn’t “Made in the USA” and may not even get made at all.

At best, they’ll get a smartphone with underwhelming specifications that is bolstered by branding. At worst, the deposits are gone, and all the consumers get is an expensive lesson.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link