Skullcandy Method 360 ANC review: Brilliant Bose sound on a budget


Skullcandy Method 360 ANC

MSRP $100.00

“The Skullcandy Method 360 ANC are nothing short of a gift to Bose fans on a budget.”

Pros

  • Affordably priced
  • Excellent sound quality
  • Comfortable and secure
  • Multipoint and wear sensors
  • Very good battery life

Cons

  • Awkward charging case
  • No wireless charging

Skullcandy has made lots of decent-sounding, budget-friendly wireless earbuds and headphones over the years. But no Skullcandy product has ever had noise canceling or sound quality that approaches, let alone rivals, a brand like Bose, until now.

Enter the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC. At first glance, with their stem-based shape and slide-out charging case, they look a lot like the company’s Dime Evo. But when earbud aficionados look a little closer, they’ll notice the Method 360’s uncanny resemblance to the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds. That’s no accident, and no, Skullcandy didn’t rip off Bose’s design. Instead, the two companies partnered to create the Method 360 ANC, and the result is stunning. These are easily the best-sounding earbuds Skullcandy has ever made. And with an introductory price of $100, Bose fans aren’t the only ones who should be paying attention.

Editor’s note: Skullcandy has indicated that the Method 360 ANC will cost more in the weeks after they launch — possibly as much as $130. However, this review reflects our thoughts at the $100 launch price. If and when the price goes up, we may alter our rating.

Comfort and style

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC.
Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

There are no two ways about it, the Method 360 are nearly identical to the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (QCUE). Put the two side by side like I did in these pics, and it’s immediately obvious how similar they are. The Method 360 even use the same stability bands — the silicone gaskets that provide a secure but comfortable fit. Like the QCUE, you get three sizes of these bands and three sizes of eartips. I’ve always liked the way the QCUE feel, and the Method 360 are every bit as comfortable. Like the Bose buds, the Method 360 are rated IPX4 for basic water resistance.

Skullcandy has found a few ways to put its own unique spin on the design. The Method 360 uses a glossy stem with the distinctive half-skull emblem, and there are indicator LEDs on the outer surface.

I’m less excited by the charging case. Skullcandy has opted for a sliding sleeve design over the more traditional clamshell or flip-top. It makes for a big and bulky package that isn’t as easy to slip into a pocket. Maybe that’s why you get an included carabiner — to clip it to a belt loop instead.

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC.
Skullcandy

On the other hand, Skullcandy fans may adore the case’s many styles. It comes in four translucent solid colors (black, white, red, and beige) plus a leopard-look animal skin pattern.

Getting the buds in and out is also quite fiddly. You have to learn the correct orientation for each side, because there’s nothing immediately intuitive about it.

Here’s a tip: hold the case upside down, with the skull logo facing up, but away from you, and the carabiner loop pointing toward you, but on the bottom. Pull on the loop, and when the earbud holder slides out, the right earbud will be on the right side and the left on the left. You can pull them straight out and put them in your ear without any twisting or turning.

Controls and connections

Though the Method 360 may look like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds, from a software perspective, they appear to use the same platform as the newer Bose QuietComfort Earbuds, and that’s mostly a good thing. Skullcandy’s SkullIQ app is a clone of the Bose QCE app (or maybe vice versa?), and you’ll find plenty of customizations, including full control over the touch gestures (something Bose doesn’t offer on the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds).

There are four per side (single-, double-, and triple-tap, plus tap-and-hold) and these can be assigned to any function, including play/pause, track skip, volume up/down, ANC/transparency, Spotify Tap, voice assistant access, or take photo.

I’m not a big fan of touch controls, but I found they worked flawlessly on the Method 360.

Wear sensors help out with auto-pause and resume, though curiously, these can’t be disabled.

The two areas where I’d like to see more QuietComfort Ultra influence are ANC control and Multipoint.

With the Ultra Earbuds, you can choose to shift between ANC and transparency mode, without cycling through an off mode. Bose doesn’t offer that on the QuietComfort Earbuds and it’s not on the Method 360 either.

The Bose Music app, which is used to control the Ultra Earbuds (and many other Bose products) gives you a very handy overview of previously paired devices as well as currently paired ones. Switching between these devices is a snap. For the QCE/Method 360, you’re on your own. You can turn Multipoint on or off, but there’s no device management.

Still, Multipoint works like a charm, and I had no problem rapidly switching between two connected devices.

Sound quality

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC.
Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

I can’t believe I’m writing this, but the $99 Method 360 ANC sound exactly like the $299 QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds when you use both with an iPhone. I specify the phone because the Ultra Earbuds let you use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Sound aptX Lossless codec when you have a compatible (non-iPhone) Android handset, and that will make a small but noticeable difference.

So when Skullcandy brags that “Skullcandy brings the style, Bose brings the sound,” that’s not just marketing B.S. — it’s legit.

Compared to the Skullcandy Rail ANC, the Method 360 is on another level. Bass is delightfully full and authoritative, there’s plenty of detail in the midranges, and in classic Bose style, the highs are delivered with a sparkly energy.

As I skipped through my usual test tracks, I kept saying to myself, yup, yup, yup, as I swapped back and forth between the Method and the Ultra Earbuds.

You may not like the Bose sound — not everyone does — but if you’re like the many who do, the Method 360 ANC are nothing short of a gift to Bose fans on a budget.

You even get three helpful EQ presets (Music, Bass Boost, and Podcast) plus a custom setting with the same five-band equalizer that Bose gives QuietComfort Earbuds owners.

Noise cancellation and transparency

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC.
Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

Bose may power the Method 360’s sound, but it’s keeping the brand’s crown jewel (active noise cancellation) for itself. The Method 360’s ANC is arguably the best that Skullcandy has ever offered on a set of wireless earbuds, but it’s not as capable as the Bose QuietComfort Earbuds and nowhere close to the Ultra Earbuds.

That’s totally fine considering the price. ANC mode is still powerful enough to reduce many distracting sounds. At my gym, it didn’t give me absolute silence, but it dropped the drone of the nearby treadmills and the house sound system to the point where I could easily focus on my podcasts.

Traffic and other street sounds were similarly reduced. I’m not sure when you’d ever want to block less sound, but there’s an adjustment for ANC intensity in the SkullIQ app.

The ANC mode’s one real weakness is wind. Even small gusts are audible. If you plan to use the Method 360 ANC for running or cycling, you may need to turn ANC off.

Transparency, or “StayAware” as Skullcandy calls it, is also perfectly serviceable, letting in a good amount of external sound, and it keeps your voice sounding fairly natural in your ears. Again, it’s not as clear as on Bose’s earbuds, but it’s hardly a deal-breaker.

There are just two things I want Skullcandy to fix: The inability to toggle just between ANC and transparency, as I mentioned earlier, and a way to turn down the volume on the spoken mode change announcements. They’re freakishly loud. Better yet, let me turn them off.

Call quality

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC.
Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

As surprising as it is that the Method 360 sound as good as the Bose QC Ultra Earbuds, it’s even more surprising that their call quality is actually better than both the Ultra and the regular QC Earbuds.

Not that Bose buds are known for their call quality. Bose does many things well, but call quality has only ever been middling at best. Still, the Skullcandy buds are better and kept my voice free from heavy compression more consistently while blocking out more external sounds.

When calling in StayAware mode, the ability to hear your own voice helps a lot with fatigue.

Battery life

Skullcandy pegs the Method 360 ANC’s endurance at up to 9 hours per charge with ANC on (and a total of 32 hours with the charging case’s capacity added), and those numbers jump up to 11 and 40, respectively, when ANC is off.

For those of you keeping score, that’s about the same as the regular Bose QC Earbuds.

If you should run out of juice, there’s a fast-charge system that promises two extra hours of listening time after 10 minutes of charging.

The SkullIQ app will show you the battery level of the earbuds, but the only way to check the case’s remaining charge is to remove or replace one of the earbuds and then note the color of the case’s LED.

What’s missing?

I’ve spent most of this review demonstrating how favorably the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC compare with Bose’s QC and QC Ultra Earbuds. But it’s worth noting some of the differences, too.

Here are a few features that you’ll find on Bose’s buds that aren’t available from Skullcandy.

  • Bose Immersive (spatial) Audio (QC Ultra)
  • Fit test (QC Ultra)
  • Qualcomm aptX Adaptive/Lossless codecs (QC Ultra)
  • CustomTune personalization (QC Ultra)
  • On-device voice commands (QC Earbuds)
  • Wireless charging (QC Earbuds)

Conclusion

Though they come with a charging case that is both awkward and bulky, the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC are a stunning value. The partnership with Bose has given them top-notch sound quality, comfort, and stability.

With call quality that bests both of Bose’s ANC wireless earbuds, great controls and customization options, and battery life that is more than sufficient for most folks, it’s kinda hard to object to less-than-perfect ANC and transparency when you’re only spending $100.








Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Summary

  • Sony & Hisense are pioneering RGB LED tech to rival OLED displays.
  • RGB LEDs improve color accuracy at wider angles and brightness without burn-in risk.
  • RGB LEDs reduce bloom and offer large panels at cheaper prices than OLEDs.

If you ask most AV enthusiasts what the best display technology is right now, they’d probably respond with some variant of OLED panel. However, one of the best TV makers in the world has decided that OLED is not the way forward, and instead brings us RGB LED technology.

In mid-March of 2025, Sony unveiled its RGB LED technology. It’s not the only company pushing this OLED alternative, with Hisense aiming to launch RGB mini- and micro-LED TVs in 2025. So why are these companies bucking the OLED trend?

Sony’s RGB Backlight Tech Explained

Just in case you need a refresher, the main difference between OLED and LCD panels is that OLEDs are emissive. In other words, each OLED pixel emits its own light. This means that it can switch itself off and offer perfect black levels, among a few other advantages. LCDs need a “backlight” and one of the primary ways LCDs have improved over the years has been about backlight innovations as much as improvements to the liquid crystals.

Early LCDs used a simple CCFL (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp) backlight with an internal reflector to spread the light around. As you might imagine, this was awful, and I still remember the cold and hot spots on my first LCD monitor being so bad that I thought there was something wrong with it.

Related


TN vs. IPS vs. VA: What’s the Best Display Panel Technology?

The most influential decision you can make when you buy a new monitor is the panel type. So, what’s the difference between TN, VA, and IPS, and which one is right for you?

Since then, LCDs have been upgraded with LED backlights, which were placed all around the edges of the screen, so that it was far more evenly lit. Then the backlights were also added directly behind the screen, which allowed for neat tricks like local dimming. Now miniLED screens put hundreds or thousands of LED lights behind the screen, allowing for very precise local dimming, which improved contrast and black levels immensely.

A diagram of a conventional LCD with a quantum dot layer.
SONY

However, so far all of these LED backlight solutions have used a white (or blue) LED source. RGB LEDs replace this white LED with an RGB LED that can be any color. This means that the LED behind a given set of pixels is being driven with the same color light as the pixel is meant to produce and removes the need for color filters.

A diagram of an RGB LED LCD.
SONY

If you take the LCD layer off completely, then an RGB miniLED backlight would look like a low-res version of the original image. With enough LEDs, the image is still recognizable!

Related


What Is an OD Zero Mini LED TV?

Get ready for thinner and brighter Mini LED TVs.

Better Color Accuracy at Wider Angles

The Sony display demoed by the company promises 99% of the DCI-P3 color spectrum, and 90% of the next-gen BT.2020 spectrum. Making these displays some of the most color-accurate screens money can buy. With fewer layers of stuff in the display stack, and much more pure color to boot, the image looks vibrant, accurate, and maintains its color purity from a wider set of angles.

Related


What Is Color Gamut?

Take this into account the next time you buy a monitor, TV, or printer.

More Brightness, No Burn In

The less stuff you have between the light source and the surface of the screen, the brighter the image can be. Hisense’s RGB LED TVs are slated for 2025 promise a peak brightness of 10,000 nits! That is way beyond the brightest OLED panels, even LG’s tandem OLED that was demonstrated in January 2025, which maxes out at 4,000 nits.

While LCDs can have image retention, they are far, far less prone to it than OLEDs, and the brighter you run an OLED, the greater the chances of permanent image retention or “burn-in”. So RGB LEDs will absolutely smoke OLEDs when it comes to brightness, with virtually none of the risk.

Related


The New iPad Pro Has a Tandem OLED Screen, But What Is It and How Does It Work?

Two OLEDs are better than one.

A Lack of Bloom To Rival OLEDs

One of the big issues with LED LCDs, even the latest miniLEDs, is “bloom”. This is when light from the backlight in the bright part of an image spills over into the dark parts. Even on LCDs with thousands of dimming zones, you can see this when there’s something very bright next to something very dark.

Blooming on LED TV
LG

For example, my iPad Pro has a mini-LED screen, and if the brightness is turned up you can see bloom around white text on a black background, such as with subtitles or the end-credits of a movie. In content, you’d see this with laser blasts in space, or a big spotlight in the night sky.

RGB LEDs significantly reduce bloom thanks to the precise control of the brightness and color of each RGB backlight element. So you get contrast levels closer to that of an OLED, but you still get the brightness and color purity advantages.

Related


OLED Gaming Monitors Are Awesome, but I’m Still Not Getting One

OLED is great for gaming, but the technology just isn’t suited to serious desktop use.

Cheaper Large Panels

Perhaps the biggest deal of all is price. While I expect Sony’s Bravia 10s to have a price that will make your eyes water even more than the nits rating, the fact is that RGB LED tech will be cheaper than OLEDs, especially as you scale up to larger panel sizes. While the price of smaller OLEDs (e.g. 55-inches or smaller) has come down significantly, making bigger OLEDs is hard, and when you get to around 100-inches prices go practically vertical.

So don’t be surprised if TVs larger than 100 inches are dominated by RBG LED technology in the future, because getting 90% of what OLED offers at a much lower price will likely be too hard to resist.

OLED Still Has Tricks up Its Sleeve

Dell 32 PLus 4K QD-OLED monitor sitting on a table playing a video.
Justin Duino / How-To Geek

With all that said, it’s not like OLED technology will stand still or is in major trouble. OLED’s perfect black levels, lack of bloom, and contrast levels are still better and will likely always be better. So those who are absolute sticklers for those elements of image quality will still buy them. Manufacturers are working on the issue of burn in and making it less of a problem with each new generation of screen.

lg b4

LG B4 OLED

$1000 $1700 Save
$700

OLED still has faster pixel response rates too, and lower latency (under the right circumstances), so gamers are also another audience who’ll likely want OLED technology to stick around. QD-OLEDs are upping the game when it comes to color vibrancy and gamut as well.


Ultimately, having different display technologies duke it out for supremacy is good for you and me, because it means better TVs and monitors at lower prices.



Source link