New York State Must Intervene In The Behavioral Health Crisis by Reforming Managed Care


New York State is in the middle of a behavioral health crisis. Suicide rates are up over 40% in the last 20 years. Overdose rates are almost four times higher than they were in 2010. During this crisis, Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) paid by the State are taking hundreds of millions of dollars out of the system while delaying payments to providers, delaying care for people, exacerbating waiting lists, and undermining the stability of this healthcare delivery system. This must change now.

NYS Council Logo

The New York State Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare (The Council) has been leading an advocacy campaign with over 20 organizations representing New Yorkers in need of behavioral healthcare, their families, providers, and several legislators to carve outpatient, rehabilitation, and residential behavioral healthcare out of Medicaid managed care.

Ten years ago, New York State’s Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT) moved behavioral healthcare into managed care under the state’s “care management for all” initiative with the promise that MCOs would coordinate care, control costs, and ensure members’ care is integrated across the providers serving them. A decade later, New York has shown that MCOs don’t coordinate care, don’t control costs, don’t ensure their members get integrated care, and don’t pay claims accurately or on time. This has led to a major access-to-care crisis that New York must address now.

Promised improvements haven’t materialized, but significant payment delays, ballooning administrative demands, and exacerbations of an already exploding workforce crisis have. The money lost to managed care has led to a contraction in services while the pandemic and its sequelae have led to skyrocketing demand for both mental health and addiction services. Waiting lists are growing and accessing care is harder for families.

Numerous plans have failed to meet expenditure targets set by the State requiring them to spend 96% of premiums on actual care in Medicaid. The State’s failure to collect these overpayments was the subject of assertive advocacy by The NYS Council that resulted in over $500 million (federal and state share) returned to behavioral health services. Yet MCO evasion continues.

By any objective measure, MCOs have failed to deliver on the promises that led the MRT to move behavioral healthcare into managed care. A carve-out would enable the state to reinvest $400 million annually, currently paid to plans for profit and administration, to help fill gaps in care and help recruit and retain the workforce needed to meet demand for services. This is also critical to address anticipated increases in the number of New Yorkers who will be uninsured due to H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Last week, former Deputy Health Secretary Paul Francis and the Step Two Policy Project brought their intellect and experience to bear on the question of whether behavioral health services should be carved back out of managed care. This issue brief follows past analyses by Step Two about whether managed long-term care should remain in managed care and whether school-based health services should be carved in.

Step Two pointed out the failures of MCOs with behavioral health (don’t take my word for it, take theirs).

  • MCOs didn’t meet spending requirements: plans have been hoarding taxpayer dollars and had to return hundreds of millions of dollars to the state (after they held the money and kept the investment returns).
  • MCOs deny claims at an astronomical rate: Step Two found “persistent non-compliance” with denials in excess of the 20% threshold set by the Office of Mental Health (OMH) and external appeals overturned 52% of the time for mental health and 64% of the time for substance use disorder services.
  • MCOs fail to pay state-mandated rates: Plans fail to pass through mandated increases for cost-of-living adjustments to providers despite receiving the dollars in their monthly premiums.
  • MCOs do not comply with mental health parity laws: Plans have been out of compliance with both federal (Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act) and state (Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Parity Reporting Act) laws, further restricting access to care.
  • Network adequacy is an illusion: MCOs have been caught red-handed with “ghost networks.” The Attorney General’s secret shopper investigation found that only 18% of plans’ network providers were offering an appointment. An October 2023 report commissioned by the State, conducted by Boston Consulting Group (BCG), found that more than two out of five behavioral health providers listed in plan directories do not bill for Medicaid services.
  • The state does not hold MCOs accountable: Despite hundreds of citations (over 320 since 2019) and hundreds of millions of dollars returned to the state, the Department of Health has repeatedly and chronically failed to hold MCOs accountable in any meaningful way. They lack the means and appetite to hold plans accountable for performance that is clearly unacceptable.

Like a physician who has made a correct diagnosis but prescribed the wrong treatment, Step Two saw the problem clearly but does not propose the obvious solution: acknowledge that the managed care experiment has failed and continues to fail New Yorkers. They urge New York to commission another report on the viability of this model while wishfully thinking that DOH will increase enforcement of MCOs. We have been there and we know it won’t work. As cited in the Step Two paper, BCG already conducted this study for the State three years ago. Another report will tell us what we already know: the experiment with carving behavioral healthcare services into managed care didn’t work and New Yorkers are suffering and dying as a result.

We don’t need another report. We need change and we need it urgently. Studying the problem and imagining that DOH will hold plans accountable is akin to asking New Yorkers to believe that this time Charlie Brown will kick that football. We know better.

The only way to help New Yorkers who are desperate for behavioral healthcare and the providers trying to care for them is to carve behavioral health services out of managed care. We can’t afford to wait.

Lauri Cole, MSW, is Executive Director of the NYS Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare.

This article was republished with permission. View the original source here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modularity was one of the most exciting phone trends of the 2010s. It promised phones that would work like desktop PCs, allowing owners to upgrade individual components, add new functionalities, and replace broken parts with ease, improving longevity and ushering in a new, sustainable smartphone era.

While its early days looked promising thanks to pioneers like Modu, which launched the first modular phone in 2008, Google’s Project Ara, and Motorola’s Moto Z lineup, the modularity dream ultimately fizzled out. But not before begetting a few exciting modular phones that captured our attention, if nothing else.

1

Google Project Ara

Google Project Ara prototype modular phone with various modules placed around it. Credit: Google

After Google acquired modular phone-related patents from Modu, which closed its doors in 2011, Google and Motorola, which Google bought in 2011, began exploring the modular phone concept in 2012. Google Project Ara officially kicked off in 2013, with the design philosophy based on Dave Hakkens’ Phonebloks concept.

The original idea was for Google/Motorola to produce the phone’s base, the so-called “Endo” (exoskeleton) frame, with third-party vendors providing everything else, from displays to cameras to batteries. Modules would attach to the phone via an innovative magnetic mechanism with hot swap support.

A Google Project Ara prototype along with a bunch of modules around it. Credit: Google

The dream was to provide a modular phone where almost everything would be easily replaceable and upgradable. Google had to walk back some of the original design choices, such as the ability to replace the screen and the SoC, due to hardware limitations, but the project didn’t abandon its promise of modularity.

Sadly, after three years of development, Google pulled the plug on Project Ara in September 2016, citing high costs and manufacturing issues. Project Ara (kind of) lived on in Motorola’s Moto Mods, but we’ve never gotten a proper Project Ara modular smartphone.

A crying shame because the college me had his mind blown by the whole modular phone movement of the 2010s. Even today, I’d love nothing more than to play around with Project Ara prototypes, if only for a few minutes.

2

LG G5

A hand holding the LG G5 phone. Credit: LG Mobile

LG had a few Android hits back in the early 2010s. The LG G2 is still one of the prettiest Android phones ever, and it sold quite well. The G3 ironed out its predecessor’s kinks while keeping up its sales momentum. But the upward trajectory stalled with the LG G4, so the Korean giant decided to shake up its flagship series.

Enter the LG G5, one of LG’s most ambitious phones ever. The phone’s bottom segment was removable, allowing owners to quickly install modules LG touted as “Friends,” which included various extra functionalities. You had a high-end DAC and Amp, a module that packed extra battery capacity and additional camera controls, and a module with a replaceable battery, allowing you to swap in a new one in a jiff.

LG G5 with a camera module attached to it and another module lying next to it Credit: LG

While the phone piqued the attention of smartphone enthusiasts, myself included, sales showed that the mainstream audience wasn’t exactly engrossed by the concept. Ultimately, the LG G5 had disappointing sales numbers, and LG abandoned its “friends” modular add-ons ecosystem shortly after, with the G5 staying the only modular phone in LG’s lineup.

LG Wing.


The 10 Weirdest Android Phones Ever

Phones weren’t always boring slabs.

3

Essential Phone (Essential PH-1)

Essential Phone PH-1 with Essential written in the foreground. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | Essential Products

The Essential Phone had a lot going for it even before it hit the shelves. The brainchild of Andy Rubin, the father of Android, the phone created quite a buzz in the tech world back when it was announced in the spring of 2017. Its bold design, which debuted the notch, ditched the 3.5mm headphone jack, and made the two camera lenses flush with the phone’s slick ceramic back, was a head turner.

Early promotional photos showed the phone with a camera module attached. It was later revealed that the Essential PH-1 features a magnetic Click Connector on the upper right of its back. The connector allowed the PH-1 to be used with custom-made modules, and while Essential only provided one module at launch, the 360° camera, it promised more modules further down the road.

Essential Phone with its 360 camera module attached to it. Credit: Essential

Alas, the Essential PH-1 didn’t sell that well, even after receiving a $200 price reduction shortly after launch. This affected Essential’s promise of modularity. Ultimately, we only got one extra module that incorporated a headphone jack and a high-end DAC. While the PH-1 had a lot of promise (I loved its vanilla Android experience, modularity, and flush design), it didn’t pan out. Its successor, the Essential PH-2, was canceled, we never got new modules, and Karl Pei’s Nothing bought the Essential brand in 2021.

4

Motorola Moto Z

A Motorola Moto Z phone against a green background Credit: Motorola

Motorola’s Moto Mods modular ecosystem is, hands down, the most well-received, popular, and longest-lived modular phone undertaking in history. It all started in 2016 with the release of the Motorola Moto Z, one of the thinnest phones of all time and a real looker even by modern standards.

Drawing on experience from working on Google’s Project Ara, Motorola’s engineers developed a magnetic attachment system powered by pogo pins that used barely any space on the Moto Z’s slender body. The phone arrived with a wide selection of Moto Mods, including a power bank, a great-sounding JBL speaker, as well as more exotic add-ons such as a projector and a full-fledged point-and-shoot camera with a 10x zoom.

Various moto mods modules lying on a table Credit: Motorola

Unlike other modular phone projects, Motorola provided a wide selection of Moto Mods at launch and greatly expanded the offering over the years. The company supported Moto Mods across four generations of Moto Z devices, with a total of 7 phones compatible with modular add-ons. Even some community-developed Moto Mods projects saw the light of day, like the slide-out keyboard mod.

Unfortunately, the Moto Mods project was abandoned in 2019, with the Moto Z4 being the last modular handset from Motorola. Despite its demise, Moto Mods left the deepest mark on the promise of modularity in Android, which still (kind of) lives on.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Moto Z


Samsung’s “Thin” Galaxy S25 Edge Is Thicker Than a 9 Year Old Motorola Phone

Phones have gotten thicker.

5

Fairphone

Fairphone 5 front and back Credit: Corbin Davenport / Fairphone

While not as exciting as other phones on this list, the Fairphone series of Android smartphones is the closest thing we’ve gotten to Google’s Project Ara. Aside from the original Fairphone, every member of the Fairphone family is an easy-to-repair, modular Android phone.

Instead of extra features, modular parts in Fairphone devices are there to allow for a high degree of repairability. They include the display, camera module with interchangeable lenses, an easy-to-replace battery, the SoC module, and modular daughterboards and flex cables.

A Fairphone 6 with its back removed Credit: Fairphone

They’re straightforward to remove and reattach, allowing owners to repair their phones by themselves from the comfort of their home. All you need are some screwdrivers and tweezers, spare parts you can order directly from the Fairphone spare parts shop, and you’re off to the races.

Despite being one of the easiest phones to repair, the latest Fairphone offering—the Fairphone 6—is anything but popular. It’s a niche device that the mainstream audience, as well as many enthusiasts, aren’t interested in, because being fully modular entails certain compromises (a plastic body, a mid-range chipset, cameras that trail high-end options, and more) that most phone users don’t want to deal with.


While the promise of modularity was exciting in the 2010s, the cold, harsh truth is that most of us will always choose high-end features and hard-to-repair unibody designs over sustainable, repairable modular phones.

iPhone MagSafe and accessories


Apple Proved Modular Accessories Work, But Can Anyone Else Do It?

Apple succeeds where many have failed.



Source link