Image Playground to see upgrades in OS 27


Image Playground will generate images based on provided photos and other inputs, but the results leave a lot to be desired

Generative AI is not Apple’s strong suit, but Image Playground, the tool responsible for horrific AI avatar generation and Genmoji, should see significant improvements with the OS 27 cycle.

Apple announced Apple Intelligence features that had to be delayed in 2024, and one of them should have been Image Playground. While the other AI tools were of passable usefulness and quality, the image generation tool still leaves a lot to be desired.

According to the “Power On” newsletter from Bloomberg, the Image Playground app should see a “big boost” from Apple’s upgraded Apple Foundation Models. It’s an obvious statement given that Gemini is being distilled into Apple’s models, and one of Gemini’s specialties is image generation.

However, even as Apple’s image generation feature improves, its models will still likely lag behind competing options by some margin. Users that want more oomph behind their image generation in Image Playground will be able to use third-party models of their choosing.

Image generation is bad AI

While the results are often unfortunate, Image Playground is more of a proof-of-concept than a useful tool in its current form. Apple presented it as a way to turn your mom into an AI-slop superhero for what would be a simply terrible birthday message.

While no one on Earth should use Image Playground for that function, it can be somewhat entertaining the same way other gen AI models have been. Using it to see how it might interpret a specific person or prompt can be amusing, but the output isn’t something anyone could or should rely on for anything beyond a giggle in an iMessage group chat.

The only good thing about Image Playground output (when using Apple’s models) is that it’s either on device or in Private Cloud Compute servers that run on renewable energy. While generative slop is loaded with moral quandaries, that’s one area Image Playground doesn’t suffer from.

Genmoji is the true winner in Image Playground. While it isn’t a function I’ve used much, it has enough guardrails that it can make some decent results.

Even if Image Playground is able to one day achieve Pixar or Ghibli-level results with on-device AI, there’s the argument that all gen AI is bad for humanity. One area of image generation Apple will no doubt stay away from is the ability to produce photorealistic output, which can lead to problems like deepfakes.

OS 27 getting new Apple Foundation Models

iOS 27 is expected to make Genmoji more proactive in the system by suggesting premade options in the text suggestion box. Shared Genmoji become available to the people you send them to, so everyone can get some use out of that weed emoji.

Smartphone screen showing a writing tools interface with options like proofread, rewrite, tone choices, and formatting styles such as summary, key points, list, and table on a blue background

Writing Tools are one of Apple’s better AI features

Apple’s weakest offerings in AI are its generative functions, however, they’re fully optional and easily ignored. There is no doubt Apple will continue to pursue better image generation, but if that’s something you want to do, you might want to stick to other apps.

That said, Image Playground could prove much better in OS 27 and earn its place as a useful toolset. The app itself is fine, but Image Playground also exists outside of the app as an extension interface in places like Notes and Freeform.

If Apple can make Image Playground a useful tool that can run on devices with Apple’s arguably somewhat ethical AI models, then I welcome it. Though improvements could mean turning the tool into a plagiarism machine, which will create a whole different set of issues.

People that want to perform these functions are going to seek out tools that offer them. If gen AI must exist to meet consumer expectations, then Apple should have a good offering.

These fake images that lack artistic ingenuity or integrity are getting created no matter what. So, if some of them can be made with ethically sourced AI, local models running on a device’s battery, or on private servers powered by renewable energy, I’d say it is a net positive.

The ability to choose third-party models for Image Playground through a system API will prove interesting. However, once you’ve sent your data to that third-party, all bets are off from an ethical and privacy-oriented standpoint.

At least you can make a plagiarized Ghibli avatar for social media instead of paying a human to make one for you, I guess.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link