Man arrrested for $31,000 iPhone theft


London iPhone theft victims have reported threats, AirTag catches a burglar in Pittsburgh, and California prisoners did not receive iPads, all in this week’s Apple Crime Blotter.

The latest in an occasional AppleInsider series, looking at the world of Apple-related crime.

Chicago man arrested in $31,000 iPhone theft

A 34-year-old temporary employee at a logistics facility in Illinois has been charged with stealing $31,000 worth of iPhones from the building.

According to Fox 32 Chicago, the man was caught on security footage entering a trailer, and later concealing the approximately 40 stolen iPhones in a sweater.

The man, who lives in Chicago, was charged with a felony count of theft.

London iPhone theft victims report threats

The city of London has, in recent years, suffered a massive wave of iPhone thefts, with 81,000 reported stolen in 2024 and 71,000 in 2025.

The New York Times reported on May 23 that many of those victimized by such thefts have subsequently received threatening phone calls and text messages from the thieves.

“I know who you are and where you live,” was the message received by a Chicago resident whose iPhone was stolen in London. “I’ve killed or far less than a phone before.”

The threats, the newspaper said, have often been tied to the thieves’ desire to have the victims unlink their IDs from the stolen devices.

AirTag helps catch man accused of multiple crimes in Pittsburgh

A man accused of both sexual assault and burglary has been caught after he stole an AirTag from the victim’s home.

According to CBS News Pittsburgh, the AirTag and $2 in cash were both taken from the victim’s home. Police followed the ping to a nearby location where the man was arrested, while fingerprints left at the scene also pointed to that particular suspect.

He confessed to the assault, but not to the theft of the AirTag. He has been charged with burglary, aggravated indecent assault, and indecent assault.

No, California prisoners were not given free iPads

A report by City Journal in mid-May alleged that state prisoners in California, including some on death row, were given tablet computers. The report states that these tablets have been used by prisoners to watch pornography and for other controversial purposes.

However, multiple aggregations of that report by other media outlets, including one by Fox LA, have erroneously referred to the tablets in question as “iPads.”

They are not, as the original contract for the tablets was with Viapath/Global Tel Link. A recent bidding process led to a change in vendor to Securus Technologies.

Securus provides Android tablets under the EVOTAB brand. The tablets are not iPads, and there are no reports that Apple has ever been involved in the program.

In addition, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. James Comer (R-SC) called the tablets “iPads” in announcing plans for Congress to investigate the program.

Gov. Gavin Newsom may not have authorized iPads, but he did, earlier in May, preside over the release of California’s American Innovation Coin honoring Steve Jobs.

Information about “city-managed Apple accounts” was part of a report on Minneapolis Police Chief’s ouster

Brian O’Hara, the Minneapolis Police Chief and a prominent figure during the recent ICE siege in that city, resigned on May 26.

According to The New York Times, O’Hara stepped down following “a personnel investigation into his conduct,” and that “O’Hara had likely deleted a contact from his phone last year while facing a previous internal investigation into allegations that he had sexual relationships with city workers.” However, the report found no evidence that such relationships occurred.

KSTP published the report itself, which found that among the evidence in the “Original Investigation” was “Information from the City’s IT department about a transfer to City-managed Apple accounts on March 20, 2025.”

Man arrested in Florida iPhone theft, fraudulent charges

A man in Florida was arrested on May 17 and charged with stealing an iPhone and perpetrating a subsequent “wave of fraudulent credit card charges.”

CBS 12 reports a victim had approached the Stuart Police Department in December 2025 and reported that his iCloud account was compromised. Over the course of a month, the report said, the fraudulent purchases continued, which included gift cards and other items.

The man was arrested on five counts of fraudulent use of identification, petit theft, and theft of a credit card.

Customer service scam costs Californians $15,000

A resident of Folsom, Calif., told police that they were contacted by phone by a bogus Apple customer service representative.

According to The Folsom Times, the fake rep told the victim about false transactions, and later met the victim and “collected $15,000 in cash.”

Police are looking for a “porch pirate” who took an Apple Watch

Police in Rye, N.Y., put out a call in April to see if anyone recognized a “porch pirate” who was caught on camera stealing a “freshly delivered Apple Watch off the front porch of a residence in a neighborhood in close proximity to the Playland Parkway.”

The suspect, the police department said, “arrived on a motorized scooter 45 minutes after the package was delivered by UPS.”

Bangladeshi actress’ iPhone is stolen

An iPhone belonging to Bangladeshi actress Tanha Tasnia Islam was stolen in mid-May, reportedly by a man falsely posing as the driver for a different actor, Joy Chowdhury.

According to Daily New Nation, “discussions have begun,” in relation to the theft at Bangladesh Film Development Corporation (BFDC), as it took place while the actress was dubbing dialogue.

iPhone “snatched” from candidate for Miss International Queen Philippines

A woman competing in the Miss International Queen Philippines pageant had her silver iPhone 17 Pro Max stolen in mid-May.

The Daily Tribune wrote that the iPhone belonging to Mikay Bautista was “stolen by riding-in-tandem suspects” when she was in Quezon City.

Bautista was first runner-up in the competition, which took place two days after the theft.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link