Quantum computing looms, and your security is nowhere near ready


datacenterquatumshutterstock-2245101581

Alexandr Iakimov via Shutterstock

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Quantum is almost here, but organizations are not ready.
  • Experts urge moving from 128-bit to 256-bit encryption ASAP.
  • Another looming issue: quantum skills.

Quantum computing is making our future brighter. Quantum computing is making our future more perilous. In the spirit of quantum, both states can be true at once.

Also: These 4 big technology bets will reshape the global economy in 2026

IT professionals now face tough choices as they consider, explore, or even begin preparing for the looming quantum revolution — along with hard deadlines. Powerful systems will execute in hours or minutes what once took years to process, and these advances are coming soon to an enterprise near you. But with that shift comes some powerful security issues. 

Not yet enterprise-ready

At least two dozen manufacturers “are now commercially offering more than 40 quantum processing units (QPUs), which are the processing hardware for a quantum computer,” according to MIT’s most recent Quantum Index Report. In addition, the “quantum-as-a-service model” is enabling wider access to quantum computing resources. 

Still, quantum is not quite enterprise-ready, the MIT researchers stated: “While there have been impressive advancements in performance, QPUs do not yet meet the requirements for running large-scale commercial applications such as chemical simulations or cryptanalysis.”

Also: Why the future of AI is on-premises – business advice from Dell Tech World 2026

We are not yet at the point “when quantum computers can solve problems faster than classical computers alone,” suggested a study out of the IBM Institute for Business Value. “Adapting operations, infrastructure, and partnerships as conditions change is a prerequisite for preparing for a quantum future.” 

So far, early use cases include modeling complex molecular interactions and pharmaceuticals: “Impact will follow in areas such as supply chain and logistics, where quantum’s optimization capabilities could redefine how goods move globally.”  

Building the best defense

While the impact of quantum may be a few years away, security needs to be addressed today. Quantum, by being able to process thousands of attempts at once, will be able to break through most of today’s encrypted algorithms and data stores. Tim Steward, principal data enterprise architect for Fujitsu, and author of The PostgreSQL Field Guide, warned at a recent data conference: “You assume that when something is encrypted, you’re pretty much going to be safe. That’s no longer the case.”

Quantum power is calculated in qubits. Every 10 qubits supports 1,024 computations, giving hackers 1,024 times the power to break encryption in one swoop, Steward illustrated. There are now machines with up to 6,100 qubits in processing power, and this number keeps growing.  

Also: If you’re not working on quantum-safe encryption now, it’s already too late

The best defense is to move from 126-bit to 256-bit encryption as soon as possible, as advised by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This shift may help protect encryption algorithms from quantum hacking for at least the next two decades, said Steward. He said companies need to re-examine their encryption and security strategies with this approach in mind: “Be proactive. Clearly define goals for encryptions. Help your organizations recognize limitations for your encryption environment.”

Estimates suggest that “by the end of this decade, a cryptographically relevant quantum computer will be capable of breaking the encryption that underpins our global economy,” warned Anand Oswal, executive vice president of network security at Palo Alto Networks, in a CXOTalk hosted by Michael Krigsman.

Deprecating cryptographic algorithms 

 “Governments around the world have already started taking decisive action,” said Oswal. “The EU Commission has announced plans to launch a quantum-safe communication network by 2030.” Some plans, such as CNSA 2.0 mandates issued by the US National Security Agency, took effect last year. 

In addition, algorithms such as RSA and ECC “will be officially deprecated,” Oswal predicted. “Their use will be discouraged and potentially flagged by many compliance tools. By 2035, these vulnerable cryptographic algorithms will be officially disallowed for most applications. That’s a hard stop. After this date, any system relying on them will be considered non-compliant and fundamentally insecure by the world’s largest security standards.”

Also: 51% of professionals say AI workslop lowers their productivity – stop it in 2 steps

This problem must not be pushed off into the future, Oswal emphasized. “Companies might already be behind schedule when we consider the reality of migration timelines,” he said. “Large-scale cryptographic migrations are notoriously difficult and very time-consuming. Historical data from past transitions show that these can take between five and ten years for a large, complex enterprise to complete. And for legacy applications, and think about IoT and OT devices which have embedded firmware, an upgrade might not be feasible at all.” 

Skills issues and business benefits

Another key issue is that skills may also be in short supply as quantum develops. Data cited in the MIT report indicated the demand for quantum skills has nearly tripled since 2018. The opportunities range from highly specialized jobs — error-correction scientists or quantum algorithm developers — to occupations requiring a range of skills, most of which are not quantum-related, such as business development for quantum computing firms.

The brighter side of quantum computing is its adoption as a corporate compute resource, which also cannot be understated. At least 82% of AI-first CEOs are already actively engaging partners in one or more quantum ecosystems to access complementary strengths, reduce risk, and accelerate learning, according to the IBM study. Almost half (46%) of CEOs already have a team in place for identifying specific quantum use cases. 

Also: Worried AI agents will replace you? 5 ways you can turn anxiety into action at work

CEOs in the IBM survey said they expect the main advantages of quantum to come from optimizing operations and accelerating complex simulations. AI is also expected to benefit, and quantum is anticipated to pave the way for new business ideas. Here’s where the research suggested CEOs expect quantum computing to deliver the most business value:

  • Optimizing operations, logistics, or resource allocation (48%)
  • Accelerating complex simulations (45%)
  • Advancing AI and machine learning capabilities (39%)
  • Exploring entirely new business models or services (37%)
  • Enhancing cybersecurity or encryption capabilities (32%)
  • Improving research and product development timelines (30%) 

Business leaders should start exploring quantum’s possibilities and issues through “a small, cross-functional exploration team with a six-month mandate to identify plausible quantum use cases, simulate value, and engage ecosystem partners,” the IBM researchers advised. In addition, they should start focusing near-term technology decisions on accommodating quantum inputs: “Prioritize hybrid infrastructure, portable data architectures, and AI systems that can experiment with emerging compute models without major rework.”  





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link